Effective Representation: Whereto for Workers on Fruit and Wine Farms in South Africa?

IF 0.8 Q3 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI:10.54648/ijcl2021001
E. Fergus, Shane Godfrey
{"title":"Effective Representation: Whereto for Workers on Fruit and Wine Farms in South Africa?","authors":"E. Fergus, Shane Godfrey","doi":"10.54648/ijcl2021001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article draws on empirical research that reveals the role played by farmworkers’ committees in the fruit and wine farming sectors in the Western Cape of South Africa, where trade union density is extremely low. It examines the legitimacy of these committees as a form of worker representation, with reference to relevant domestic labour legislation, common law, International Labour Organization (ILO) instruments and key private social codes, including the international Fairtrade Standard for Hired Labour. In the process, the relationship between the public and private governance instruments in the sector is considered. Farmworkers’ committees are found to fall through a regulatory gap between the different governance systems, highlighting their lack of integration and legal recognition. This is notwithstanding their potential to fill the representation gap which exists for many workers on farms. The article concludes by proposing a new approach to regulating these committees, primarily with a view to promoting more effective but still legitimate organizing and collective bargaining for all farmworkers, in the absence of representative trade unions.\nFreedom of Association, Collective Bargaining, Representation Gap, Low Union Density, Good Practice Farms, Western Cape Farmworkers, Fairtrade Standard for Hired Labour, South Africa","PeriodicalId":44213,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/ijcl2021001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article draws on empirical research that reveals the role played by farmworkers’ committees in the fruit and wine farming sectors in the Western Cape of South Africa, where trade union density is extremely low. It examines the legitimacy of these committees as a form of worker representation, with reference to relevant domestic labour legislation, common law, International Labour Organization (ILO) instruments and key private social codes, including the international Fairtrade Standard for Hired Labour. In the process, the relationship between the public and private governance instruments in the sector is considered. Farmworkers’ committees are found to fall through a regulatory gap between the different governance systems, highlighting their lack of integration and legal recognition. This is notwithstanding their potential to fill the representation gap which exists for many workers on farms. The article concludes by proposing a new approach to regulating these committees, primarily with a view to promoting more effective but still legitimate organizing and collective bargaining for all farmworkers, in the absence of representative trade unions. Freedom of Association, Collective Bargaining, Representation Gap, Low Union Density, Good Practice Farms, Western Cape Farmworkers, Fairtrade Standard for Hired Labour, South Africa
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有效代表:南非果酒农场工人去向何方?
本文借鉴了实证研究,揭示了工会密度极低的南非西开普省的水果和葡萄酒农业部门中农场工人委员会所发挥的作用。它参照有关的国内劳工立法、普通法、国际劳工组织(劳工组织)文书和包括国际雇佣劳工公平贸易标准在内的主要私人社会守则,审查这些委员会作为工人代表形式的合法性。在此过程中,考虑了该部门公共和私人治理工具之间的关系。研究发现,农场工人委员会在不同的治理体系之间存在监管缺口,突显出它们缺乏整合和法律认可。尽管他们有潜力填补许多农场工人的代表性差距。文章最后提出了一种管理这些委员会的新方法,主要是为了在缺乏具有代表性的工会的情况下,促进所有农场工人更有效但仍然合法的组织和集体谈判。结社自由,集体谈判,代表性差距,低工会密度,良好实践农场,西开普省农场工人,雇佣劳工公平贸易标准,南非
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Published four times a year, the International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations is an essential source of information and analysis for labour lawyers, academics, judges, policymakers and others. The Journal publishes original articles in the domains of labour law (broadly understood) and industrial relations. Articles cover comparative and international (or regional) analysis of topical issues, major developments and innovative practices, as well as discussions of theoretical and methodological approaches. The Journal adopts a double-blind peer review process. A distinguished editorial team, with the support of an International Advisory Board of eminent scholars from around the world, ensures a continuing high standard of scientific research dealing with a range of important issues.
期刊最新文献
Litigating the Algorithmic Boss in the EU: A (Legally) Feasible and (Strategically) Attractive Option for Trade Unions? Modern Slavery in Liner Shipping: An Empirical Analysis of Corporate Statements The Requirement of Fair Negotiation (Gebot des fairen Verhandelns) and the Principle of Undue Influence in German and US Employment Law Regulating Platform Work in the UK and Italy: Politics, Law and Political Economy Regulating Algorithmic Management at Work in the European Union: Data Protection, Non-discrimination and Collective Rights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1