Evaluation Of The Push-out Bond Strength Of The Bio-C Repair And Compare It With The Mineral Trioxide Aggregate And Amalgam When Used As Root-end Filling Material: An In Vitro Study

IF 0.6 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Dental Hypotheses Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.4103/denthyp.denthyp_160_22
F. Hammadi, Zainab M. Abdul-Ameer
{"title":"Evaluation Of The Push-out Bond Strength Of The Bio-C Repair And Compare It With The Mineral Trioxide Aggregate And Amalgam When Used As Root-end Filling Material: An In Vitro Study","authors":"F. Hammadi, Zainab M. Abdul-Ameer","doi":"10.4103/denthyp.denthyp_160_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: We aimed to assess the push‐out bond strength of BIO-C REPAIR (a ready-to-use bioceramic material), and compare it with the mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and аmаlgаm. Methods: A total of 30 single-rooted, straight human maxillary central incisors were chosen. To keep the root canal length at 15 mm, the crown was resected. The teeth underwent endodontic treatment, along with the resection of their root ends and preparation of root-end cavities. The teeth were randomly allocated into three groups as follows: BIO-C REPAIR, MTА, and Zinc-free аmаlgаm. Utilizing a universal testing machine, the push-out test was done and the digital microscope was used to assess failure made. Data were analyzed by the one-way ANOVA and chi-square test using the Python software. Results: Statistically significant difference was found among study groups regarding push-out bond strength (p < 0.001) and mode of failure (p <  0.001). Post-hoc test showed MTA has significantly lower push-out bond strength than BIO-C REPAIR and amalgam (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Within the limitation of this study, the push‐out bond strength for BIO-C REPAIR was higher than the MTA and nearly similar to the amalgam.","PeriodicalId":43354,"journal":{"name":"Dental Hypotheses","volume":"14 1","pages":"62 - 65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Hypotheses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/denthyp.denthyp_160_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We aimed to assess the push‐out bond strength of BIO-C REPAIR (a ready-to-use bioceramic material), and compare it with the mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and аmаlgаm. Methods: A total of 30 single-rooted, straight human maxillary central incisors were chosen. To keep the root canal length at 15 mm, the crown was resected. The teeth underwent endodontic treatment, along with the resection of their root ends and preparation of root-end cavities. The teeth were randomly allocated into three groups as follows: BIO-C REPAIR, MTА, and Zinc-free аmаlgаm. Utilizing a universal testing machine, the push-out test was done and the digital microscope was used to assess failure made. Data were analyzed by the one-way ANOVA and chi-square test using the Python software. Results: Statistically significant difference was found among study groups regarding push-out bond strength (p < 0.001) and mode of failure (p <  0.001). Post-hoc test showed MTA has significantly lower push-out bond strength than BIO-C REPAIR and amalgam (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Within the limitation of this study, the push‐out bond strength for BIO-C REPAIR was higher than the MTA and nearly similar to the amalgam.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物c修复体的推出粘结强度评价及与三氧化二矿骨料和银汞合金作为根端充填材料的比较
简介:我们旨在评估BIO-C REPAIR(一种即用型生物陶瓷材料)的推出-推出结合强度,并将其与矿物三氧化物骨料(MTA)和mt5进行比较。方法:选择30颗单根直立人上颌中切牙。为了使根管长度保持在15mm,我们切除了冠。这些牙齿接受了根管治疗,同时切除了它们的根端,并准备了根端空腔。将牙齿随机分为3组:BIO-C REPAIR组、MTА组和无锌组。利用万能试验机进行推出试验,并用数码显微镜对失效进行评估。使用Python软件对数据进行单因素方差分析和卡方检验。结果:各研究组间在推出键强度(p < 0.001)和失效模式(p < 0.001)方面存在统计学差异。事后测试显示MTA的推出键强度明显低于BIO-C REPAIR和汞合金(p < 0.001)。结论:在本研究的限制范围内,BIO-C REPAIR的推出键合强度高于MTA,与汞齐合金几乎相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dental Hypotheses
Dental Hypotheses DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Salivary Levels of IL-8 and IL-34 in Periodontitis Patients: An Analytical Cross-Sectional Study Endodontic Microsurgery for a Mandibular First Molar With a Large Lateral Canal in Mesial Root: A Case Report Assessment of the Impact of Adhesive and Wires Types on the Tensile Bond Strength of Fixed Lingual Retainers Used in Orthodontics: An In Vitro Study Three-Dimensional Culture of Human Dental Pulp Tissue: A Preliminary Experimental In Vitro Model for Regenerative Endodontic Procedures Revolutionizing Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Evidence Synthesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1