The impact of the pandemic on the school-family relationship

Bram de Muynck
{"title":"The impact of the pandemic on the school-family relationship","authors":"Bram de Muynck","doi":"10.1177/20569971211069295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the remarkable issues on which the COVID-19 pandemic has shed new light is the relationship between school and family. For countries that have not had wars on their own soil for a long time that would prevent children from going to school, the pandemic has turned the firmly established relationship upside down. What kind of relationship are we talking about? To say the least, the relationship seemed untouchable. Ever since schools became institutionally embedded in society and ordered according to the standards of modernity (in most Western countries since the 19th century), the dominant partner in that relationship was the school. Parents had a duty to send their children to school, and the school then asked parents to support the learning process as best they could. The pedagogical context of the parents complemented the pedagogical context of the school (DeMuynck, 2021). However, this relationship is exactly the opposite of the ideal usually promoted in the Christian tradition, which views schools as providing a service to the primary educators—the parents. The inverted relationship—the dominance of the school in which parents serve the school—has proven effective. Indeed, many projects on parent involvement have found that positive messages parents give to their children about schools enhance school success. And support by parents given at home for the learning at school is one of the most effective aspects of parental involvement (Van Voorhis, 2011). The pandemic brought attention back to the original teaching role of parents. Children’s learning often became entirely dependent on their parents’ efforts to teach their children. Even where homeschooling was illegal (e.g. in Germany), teaching at home suddenly became normal. Many parents turned out to be capable of much more than they thought possible. Schools suddenly played a subservient role to that of parents again. However, parents were only able to help their children properly if the school communicated adequately. Thus, the circumstances of the times directed attention away from what was most effective to what was most fundamental. Parents are not an extension of","PeriodicalId":13840,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Christianity & Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Christianity & Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20569971211069295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the remarkable issues on which the COVID-19 pandemic has shed new light is the relationship between school and family. For countries that have not had wars on their own soil for a long time that would prevent children from going to school, the pandemic has turned the firmly established relationship upside down. What kind of relationship are we talking about? To say the least, the relationship seemed untouchable. Ever since schools became institutionally embedded in society and ordered according to the standards of modernity (in most Western countries since the 19th century), the dominant partner in that relationship was the school. Parents had a duty to send their children to school, and the school then asked parents to support the learning process as best they could. The pedagogical context of the parents complemented the pedagogical context of the school (DeMuynck, 2021). However, this relationship is exactly the opposite of the ideal usually promoted in the Christian tradition, which views schools as providing a service to the primary educators—the parents. The inverted relationship—the dominance of the school in which parents serve the school—has proven effective. Indeed, many projects on parent involvement have found that positive messages parents give to their children about schools enhance school success. And support by parents given at home for the learning at school is one of the most effective aspects of parental involvement (Van Voorhis, 2011). The pandemic brought attention back to the original teaching role of parents. Children’s learning often became entirely dependent on their parents’ efforts to teach their children. Even where homeschooling was illegal (e.g. in Germany), teaching at home suddenly became normal. Many parents turned out to be capable of much more than they thought possible. Schools suddenly played a subservient role to that of parents again. However, parents were only able to help their children properly if the school communicated adequately. Thus, the circumstances of the times directed attention away from what was most effective to what was most fundamental. Parents are not an extension of
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疫情对学校与家庭关系的影响
新冠肺炎大流行揭示了新的问题之一,即学校和家庭之间的关系。对于那些长期没有在自己的土地上发动战争阻止儿童上学的国家来说,疫情已经把牢固建立的关系搞得天翻地覆。我们在谈论什么样的关系?至少可以说,这段关系似乎是不可触碰的。自从学校在制度上嵌入社会并按照现代性标准进行秩序化以来(自19世纪以来,在大多数西方国家),这种关系中的主要伙伴就是学校。家长有义务送孩子上学,然后学校要求家长尽最大努力支持学习过程。家长的教学环境补充了学校的教学环境(DeMuynck,2021)。然而,这种关系与基督教传统中通常提倡的理想恰恰相反,基督教传统认为学校是为小学教育者——家长——提供服务的。这种倒置的关系——家长为学校服务的学校的主导地位——已经被证明是有效的。事实上,许多关于家长参与的项目发现,家长向孩子传达的关于学校的积极信息会提高学校的成功率。父母在家对学校学习的支持是父母参与最有效的方面之一(Van Voorhis,2011)。新冠疫情使人们重新关注家长最初的教学角色。孩子们的学习往往完全取决于父母对孩子的教育。即使在家上学是非法的(例如在德国),在家教学也突然变得正常。许多父母的能力远远超出了他们的想象。学校突然又扮演了一个屈从于家长的角色。然而,只有在学校充分沟通的情况下,家长才能正确地帮助孩子。因此,时代的环境将注意力从最有效的东西转移到了最根本的东西上。父母不是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
40.00%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
Emerging Voices: Helping College Students Reclaim Christian Proclamation Christian higher education in fractured societies: Societal challenges and agapeic wisdom Cultivating Mentors: Sharing Wisdom in Christian Higher Education Fractal imagination and Christian formation The child and God: Some reflections from disability theology on divine-child encounters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1