Evaluating the quality of the organisational learning capability measurement model

IF 2.1 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Workplace Learning Pub Date : 2023-05-18 DOI:10.1108/jwl-08-2022-0102
Hamfrey Sanhokwe, Willie T. Chinyamurindi, J. Muzurura
{"title":"Evaluating the quality of the organisational learning capability measurement model","authors":"Hamfrey Sanhokwe, Willie T. Chinyamurindi, J. Muzurura","doi":"10.1108/jwl-08-2022-0102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to answer pertinent questions related to the quality of the organisational learning capability measurement model.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA time-separated design informed data collection. The organisational learning capability was exposed to classical higher-order and bifactor confirmatory factor analyses. Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis facilitated measurement invariance testing. This study assessed the predictive validity of the organisational learning capability subscales using hierarchical regression analysis.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study replicated the second-order organisational learning capability model with four subscales. Bifactor modelling confirmed the multidimensionality of the organisational learning capability. The organisational learning capability was invariant between gender groups. The organisational learning capability subscales accounted for a significant variance in innovative work behaviour.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe organisational learning capability exhibits robust properties, making it a plausible option for monitoring the quality of organisational learning. Organisations must appreciate the quality of this dynamic capability and leverage it to generate new sources of value.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study fills a critical gap in organisational learning-related capabilities in sub-Saharan African contexts, providing a base to influence innovation-related trajectories positively.\n","PeriodicalId":47077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Workplace Learning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Workplace Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jwl-08-2022-0102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to answer pertinent questions related to the quality of the organisational learning capability measurement model. Design/methodology/approach A time-separated design informed data collection. The organisational learning capability was exposed to classical higher-order and bifactor confirmatory factor analyses. Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis facilitated measurement invariance testing. This study assessed the predictive validity of the organisational learning capability subscales using hierarchical regression analysis. Findings This study replicated the second-order organisational learning capability model with four subscales. Bifactor modelling confirmed the multidimensionality of the organisational learning capability. The organisational learning capability was invariant between gender groups. The organisational learning capability subscales accounted for a significant variance in innovative work behaviour. Practical implications The organisational learning capability exhibits robust properties, making it a plausible option for monitoring the quality of organisational learning. Organisations must appreciate the quality of this dynamic capability and leverage it to generate new sources of value. Originality/value This study fills a critical gap in organisational learning-related capabilities in sub-Saharan African contexts, providing a base to influence innovation-related trajectories positively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估组织学习能力测量模型的质量
目的本研究旨在回答组织学习能力测量模型质量的相关问题。设计/方法/方法一个时间分离的设计通知数据收集。组织学习能力采用经典的高阶和双因素验证性因素分析。多组验证性因子分析便于测量不变性检验。本研究使用层次回归分析评估组织学习能力子量表的预测效度。本研究复制了二阶组织学习能力模型的四个子量表。双因素模型证实了组织学习能力的多维性。组织学习能力在性别群体之间没有变化。组织学习能力子量表解释了创新工作行为的显著差异。实践意义组织学习能力表现出强大的特性,使其成为监控组织学习质量的合理选择。组织必须欣赏这种动态能力的质量,并利用它来产生新的价值来源。原创性/价值本研究填补了撒哈拉以南非洲地区组织学习相关能力的关键空白,为积极影响创新相关轨迹提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Workplace Learning
Journal of Workplace Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The Journal of Workplace Learning aims to provide an avenue for the presentation and discussion of research related to the workplace as a site for learning. Its scope encompasses formal, informal and incidental learning in the workplace for individuals, groups and teams, as well as work-based learning, and off-the-job learning for the workplace. This focus on learning in, from and for the workplace also brings with it questions about the nature of interventions that might assist the learning process and of the roles of those responsible directly or indirectly for such interventions. Since workplace learning cannot be considered without reference to its context, another aim of the journal is to explore the organisational, policy, political, resource issues and other factors which influence how, when and why that learning takes place.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing learning organizations through employee resilience: Investigating the mediating influence of psychological empowerment Learning organization culture and knowledge sharing: the mediating role of social capital How do care workers learn to care for people with dementia living in care homes? A model of informal learning A catalyst for activation against racism: case study on effectiveness of workplace equity, inclusion and diversity conversations Using SIM-TLX to investigate the potential impacts on cognitive load while undertaking tasks in a virtual workplace
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1