Incarceration and exposure to internally displaced persons camps associated with reproductive rights abuses among sex workers in northern Uganda

M. Erickson, S. Goldenberg, M. Akello, G. Muzaaya, P. Nguyen, J. Birungi, K. Shannon
{"title":"Incarceration and exposure to internally displaced persons camps associated with reproductive rights abuses among sex workers in northern Uganda","authors":"M. Erickson, S. Goldenberg, M. Akello, G. Muzaaya, P. Nguyen, J. Birungi, K. Shannon","doi":"10.1136/jfprhc-2016-101492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background While female sex workers (FSWs) face a high burden of violence and criminalisation, coupled with low access to safe, non-coercive care, little is known about such experiences among FSWs in conflict-affected settings, particularly as they relate to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) and rights. We explored factors associated with lifetime abortions among FSWs in northern Uganda; and separately modelled the independent effect of lifetime exposures to incarceration and living in internally displaced persons (IDP) camps on coerced and unsafe abortions. Methods Analyses are based on a community-based cross-sectional research project in Gulu District, northern Uganda (2011–2012) with The AIDS Support Organization (TASO) Gulu, FSWs, and other community organisations. We conducted questionnaires, sex worker/community-led outreach to sex work venues, and voluntary HIV testing by TASO. Results Of 400 FSWs, 62 had ever accessed an abortion. In a multivariable model, gendered violence, both childhood mistreatment/or abuse at home [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.96; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.99–3.90] and workplace violence by clients (AOR 3.57; 95% CI 1.31–9.72) were linked to increased experiences of abortion. Lifetime exposure to incarceration retained an independent effect on increased odds of coerced abortion (AOR 5.16; 95% CI 1.39–19.11), and living in IDP camps was positively associated with unsafe abortion (AOR 4.71; 95% CI 1.42–15.61). Discussion and conclusions These results suggest a critical need for removal of legal and social barriers to realising the SRH rights of all women, and ensuring safe, voluntary access to reproductive choice for marginalised and criminalised populations of FSWs.","PeriodicalId":15734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care","volume":"43 1","pages":"201 - 209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/jfprhc-2016-101492","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2016-101492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background While female sex workers (FSWs) face a high burden of violence and criminalisation, coupled with low access to safe, non-coercive care, little is known about such experiences among FSWs in conflict-affected settings, particularly as they relate to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) and rights. We explored factors associated with lifetime abortions among FSWs in northern Uganda; and separately modelled the independent effect of lifetime exposures to incarceration and living in internally displaced persons (IDP) camps on coerced and unsafe abortions. Methods Analyses are based on a community-based cross-sectional research project in Gulu District, northern Uganda (2011–2012) with The AIDS Support Organization (TASO) Gulu, FSWs, and other community organisations. We conducted questionnaires, sex worker/community-led outreach to sex work venues, and voluntary HIV testing by TASO. Results Of 400 FSWs, 62 had ever accessed an abortion. In a multivariable model, gendered violence, both childhood mistreatment/or abuse at home [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.96; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.99–3.90] and workplace violence by clients (AOR 3.57; 95% CI 1.31–9.72) were linked to increased experiences of abortion. Lifetime exposure to incarceration retained an independent effect on increased odds of coerced abortion (AOR 5.16; 95% CI 1.39–19.11), and living in IDP camps was positively associated with unsafe abortion (AOR 4.71; 95% CI 1.42–15.61). Discussion and conclusions These results suggest a critical need for removal of legal and social barriers to realising the SRH rights of all women, and ensuring safe, voluntary access to reproductive choice for marginalised and criminalised populations of FSWs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
因乌干达北部性工作者侵犯生殖权利而被监禁和暴露在境内流离失所者营地
背景尽管女性性工作者面临着较高的暴力和刑事负担,同时获得安全、非强制性护理的机会也很低,但人们对受冲突影响的环境中女性性工作者的此类经历知之甚少,尤其是在涉及性健康和生殖健康以及权利的情况下。我们探讨了乌干达北部FSW终生堕胎的相关因素;并分别模拟了终身监禁和生活在国内流离失所者营地对强迫和不安全堕胎的独立影响。方法分析基于乌干达北部古卢区的一个基于社区的横断面研究项目(2011-2012年),该项目由古卢艾滋病支持组织、FSW和其他社区组织共同开展。我们进行了问卷调查,性工作者/社区领导的性工作场所外展活动,以及TASO的自愿艾滋病毒检测。结果在400名FSW中,有62人曾经堕胎。在一个多变量模型中,性别暴力、儿童时期在家中的虐待/或虐待[调整比值比(AOR)1.96;95%置信区间(95%CI)0.99–3.90]和客户的工作场所暴力(AOR 3.57;95%CI 1.31–9.72)都与堕胎经历的增加有关。终身监禁对强迫堕胎几率的增加保持独立影响(AOR 5.16;95%CI 1.39–19.11),生活在国内流离失所者营地与不安全堕胎呈正相关(AOR 4.71;95%CI 1.42–15.61)。讨论和结论这些结果表明,迫切需要消除实现所有妇女性健康和生殖健康权利的法律和社会障碍,以及确保被边缘化和被定罪的FSW人群安全、自愿地获得生殖选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.84
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The trading of Professional, Managerial & Healthcare Publications Ltd has been transferred to its parent company, Keyways Publishing Ltd.
期刊最新文献
The Case of Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (Abt-Letterer-Siwe Disease) in Twin Girls Multifetal Gestations Planning Methods in Ecuador’s Indigenous People Reproductive Health and Family Planning Services in Africa: Looking beyond Individual and Household Factors The Role of Information Technologies in Natural Family Planning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1