The Babadook and the haunted space between high and low genres in the Australian horror tradition

IF 0.4 N/A FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION Studies in Australasian Cinema Pub Date : 2017-01-02 DOI:10.1080/17503175.2017.1308907
J. Balanzategui
{"title":"The Babadook and the haunted space between high and low genres in the Australian horror tradition","authors":"J. Balanzategui","doi":"10.1080/17503175.2017.1308907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The horror genre is a particularly fraught category in academic and mainstream critical discourse about Australian film genres. Australian horror films are often framed as either ‘Australian Gothic’ or ‘Ozploitation,’ terms that prioritise issues of national identity, class and taste rather than genre. The oppositional relationship of these terms presents an obstacle to the widespread acceptance – both scholarly and popular – of local horror films. This is illuminated by a comparison of two recent Australian horror releases and their domestic receptions, Wolf Creek 2 (McLean, Greg. 2014. Wolf Creek 2. Film. Adelaide: Duo Art Productions and Emu Creek Pictures) and The Babadook (Kent, Jennifer. 2014. The Babadook. Blu-Ray DVD. Melbourne: Umbrella Entertainment). Wolf Creek 2 was one of the most lucrative Australian films of 2014, however it was critically panned in large part due to its perceived commercialism and low-genre status. By contrast, The Babadook was the most critically praised Australian film of 2014, however the film received a limited domestic release. This paper explores how both The Babadook’s meagre domestic release and its near-universal critical praise can be related to its association with the high-art Australian Gothic tradition. Yet the film unsettles firmly entrenched art/genre, nationalism/commercialism dichotomies.","PeriodicalId":51952,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Australasian Cinema","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17503175.2017.1308907","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Australasian Cinema","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17503175.2017.1308907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT The horror genre is a particularly fraught category in academic and mainstream critical discourse about Australian film genres. Australian horror films are often framed as either ‘Australian Gothic’ or ‘Ozploitation,’ terms that prioritise issues of national identity, class and taste rather than genre. The oppositional relationship of these terms presents an obstacle to the widespread acceptance – both scholarly and popular – of local horror films. This is illuminated by a comparison of two recent Australian horror releases and their domestic receptions, Wolf Creek 2 (McLean, Greg. 2014. Wolf Creek 2. Film. Adelaide: Duo Art Productions and Emu Creek Pictures) and The Babadook (Kent, Jennifer. 2014. The Babadook. Blu-Ray DVD. Melbourne: Umbrella Entertainment). Wolf Creek 2 was one of the most lucrative Australian films of 2014, however it was critically panned in large part due to its perceived commercialism and low-genre status. By contrast, The Babadook was the most critically praised Australian film of 2014, however the film received a limited domestic release. This paper explores how both The Babadook’s meagre domestic release and its near-universal critical praise can be related to its association with the high-art Australian Gothic tradition. Yet the film unsettles firmly entrenched art/genre, nationalism/commercialism dichotomies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴巴杜克和澳大利亚恐怖传统中高低流派之间的闹鬼空间
在澳大利亚电影的学术和主流评论话语中,恐怖片是一个特别令人担忧的类别。澳大利亚恐怖片通常被定义为“澳大利亚哥特式”或“Ozploitation”,这两个词优先考虑的是国家认同、阶级和品味问题,而不是类型问题。这些术语的对立关系对本土恐怖电影的广泛接受(无论是学术还是大众)构成了障碍。最近澳大利亚上映的两部恐怖片《狼溪2》(Greg McLean, 2014)和它们在国内的反响就说明了这一点。狼溪2。电影。阿德莱德:Duo Art Productions and Emu Creek Pictures)和The Babadook(肯特,詹妮弗,2014)。Babadook。蓝光DVD。墨尔本:Umbrella Entertainment)。《狼溪2》是2014年最赚钱的澳大利亚电影之一,但它在很大程度上受到了批评,因为它被认为是商业化的,而且类型定位低。相比之下,《巴巴杜》是2014年最受好评的澳大利亚电影,但这部电影在国内上映的次数有限。本文探讨了《巴巴杜克》在国内发行的微薄收入及其近乎普遍的评论界赞誉与它与澳大利亚高艺术哥特式传统的联系。然而,这部电影打破了根深蒂固的艺术/类型、民族主义/商业主义的二分法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Australasian Cinema
Studies in Australasian Cinema FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
By way of North: reorienting the feminine other in Australian film The impacts of ethnic and mainstream culture on Māori-themed films Mad Max and the Western ‘Falling leaves return to their roots’? The reception of Chinese blockbusters by Chinese university students in New Zealand The forgotten history of the Australian film musical: tracking the production and development of the genre in Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1