On the Regulation of Checked Baggage in the Airline Industry

IF 0.9 Q3 ECONOMICS INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC JOURNAL Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI:10.1080/10168737.2021.1962949
Fernando Barros Jr, R. Castilho, Daniel Galvêas
{"title":"On the Regulation of Checked Baggage in the Airline Industry","authors":"Fernando Barros Jr, R. Castilho, Daniel Galvêas","doi":"10.1080/10168737.2021.1962949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In 2017, the Brazilian civil aviation agency changed the checkedbaggage policy, and airline companies would no longer be required to offer free baggage for its passengers. This paper builds a model to study the effects on the market equilibrium of this change in regulation. We suppose that firms operate in an oligopoly market and compete by choosing tickets and baggage quantity as in a Cournot model. Firms had to offer a free quota of baggage, which was set to zero with the deregulation. Both products enter in the firm's cost function. First, we show that the firm's profits do not change with the liberalization policy. Then, we calibrate the model's parameters using Brazilian data. Backed up by numerical simulations, we show that allowing firms to charge baggage separately from tickets results in a decrease in ticket prices (but an increase in total prices) and an increase in the amount of tickets sold in the market. Consumers are expected to have a larger surplus, hence increasing the market welfare. Our results are robust to variations in the parameters of the model. Highlights The Brazilian civil aviation agency changed the checked baggage policy; Companies are no longer be required to offer free baggage for its passengers; We set a model where firms operate in an oligopoly and study airline industry deregulation; Firm's profits do not change with the liberalization policy; There is a decrease in ticket prices (but an increase in total prices) and an increase in amount of tickets sold in the market.","PeriodicalId":35933,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC JOURNAL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2021.1962949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT In 2017, the Brazilian civil aviation agency changed the checkedbaggage policy, and airline companies would no longer be required to offer free baggage for its passengers. This paper builds a model to study the effects on the market equilibrium of this change in regulation. We suppose that firms operate in an oligopoly market and compete by choosing tickets and baggage quantity as in a Cournot model. Firms had to offer a free quota of baggage, which was set to zero with the deregulation. Both products enter in the firm's cost function. First, we show that the firm's profits do not change with the liberalization policy. Then, we calibrate the model's parameters using Brazilian data. Backed up by numerical simulations, we show that allowing firms to charge baggage separately from tickets results in a decrease in ticket prices (but an increase in total prices) and an increase in the amount of tickets sold in the market. Consumers are expected to have a larger surplus, hence increasing the market welfare. Our results are robust to variations in the parameters of the model. Highlights The Brazilian civil aviation agency changed the checked baggage policy; Companies are no longer be required to offer free baggage for its passengers; We set a model where firms operate in an oligopoly and study airline industry deregulation; Firm's profits do not change with the liberalization policy; There is a decrease in ticket prices (but an increase in total prices) and an increase in amount of tickets sold in the market.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论航空业托运行李的管理
摘要2017年,巴西民航局改变了托运行李政策,航空公司不再需要为乘客提供免费行李。本文建立了一个模型来研究这种监管变化对市场均衡的影响。我们假设公司在寡头垄断市场中运作,并通过选择机票和行李数量进行竞争,就像库诺模型中一样。公司不得不提供免费的行李配额,随着放松管制,该配额被设定为零。这两种产品都进入了公司的成本函数。首先,我们证明了企业的利润不会随着自由化政策而变化。然后,我们使用巴西数据校准模型的参数。在数值模拟的支持下,我们发现,允许公司将行李与机票分开收费会导致机票价格下降(但总价格上升),并增加市场上的机票销量。预计消费者将有更大的盈余,从而增加市场福利。我们的结果对模型参数的变化是稳健的。亮点巴西民航局改变了托运行李政策;公司不再被要求为乘客提供免费行李;我们建立了一个企业寡头垄断经营的模型,并研究了航空业放松管制的问题;企业的利润不会随着自由化政策而变化;门票价格有所下降(但总价格有所上升),市场上售出的门票数量有所增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC JOURNAL
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC JOURNAL Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: International Economic Journal is a peer-reviewed, scholarly journal devoted to publishing high-quality papers and sharing original economics research worldwide. We invite theoretical and empirical papers in the broadly-defined development and international economics areas. Papers in other sub-disciplines of economics (e.g., labor, public, money, macro, industrial organizations, health, environment and history) are also welcome if they contain international or cross-national dimensions in their scope and/or implications.
期刊最新文献
Efficiency and Welfare Effects of Fiscal Policy in Emerging Economies: The Case of Morocco The Impact of Green Innovation on CO 2 Emissions in China: Evidence from Spatial Regression Model Wealth Elasticity, Agent Heterogeneity and Fiscal Dynamics Effect of Grain Corridor Agreement on Grain Prices External Debts, Re-Election Possibilities and the Infrastructure Development Via Public Private Partnership: Evidence from Low- and Middle-Income Countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1