{"title":"Examining pre-service teachers’ critical beliefs: Validation of the Critical Literacy Beliefs Survey (CLBS)","authors":"Vera Sotirovska, Margaret Vaughn","doi":"10.1080/10476210.2022.2049742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study details the development of the Critical Literacy Beliefs Survey (CLBS) with a sample of U.S. pre-service teachers (N = 405) and provides evidence of validity for developing measures of pre-service teachers’ critical literacy beliefs. The CLBS was created to gather data on pre-service teachers’ beliefs about critical literacy and answer the question: What is the internal factor structure of the Critical Literacy Beliefs Survey (CLBS), and what evidence of validity do scores from the CLBS provide? The validation of the CLBS and item development resulted in a three-phase process, including cognitive interviews, expert review of items, and survey data collection. Each phase involved a review of the data aligning with each claim. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to test the CLBS modeled on Lewison et al.’s (2002) four critical literacy dimensions (disrupting the commonplace, interrogating multiple perspectives, focusing on sociopolitical issues, and taking action for social justice). While the qualitative model comprised four factors, the CFA analysis of the CLBS resulted in a three-factor structure with a satisfactory model fit (CFI = .93, TLI = .91, RMSEA = .09, SRMR = .05). We deduced critical literacy tenets that teacher educators can actualize within teacher preparation to cultivate critically-oriented beginning teachers.","PeriodicalId":46594,"journal":{"name":"Teaching Education","volume":"34 1","pages":"170 - 193"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2022.2049742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study details the development of the Critical Literacy Beliefs Survey (CLBS) with a sample of U.S. pre-service teachers (N = 405) and provides evidence of validity for developing measures of pre-service teachers’ critical literacy beliefs. The CLBS was created to gather data on pre-service teachers’ beliefs about critical literacy and answer the question: What is the internal factor structure of the Critical Literacy Beliefs Survey (CLBS), and what evidence of validity do scores from the CLBS provide? The validation of the CLBS and item development resulted in a three-phase process, including cognitive interviews, expert review of items, and survey data collection. Each phase involved a review of the data aligning with each claim. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to test the CLBS modeled on Lewison et al.’s (2002) four critical literacy dimensions (disrupting the commonplace, interrogating multiple perspectives, focusing on sociopolitical issues, and taking action for social justice). While the qualitative model comprised four factors, the CFA analysis of the CLBS resulted in a three-factor structure with a satisfactory model fit (CFI = .93, TLI = .91, RMSEA = .09, SRMR = .05). We deduced critical literacy tenets that teacher educators can actualize within teacher preparation to cultivate critically-oriented beginning teachers.
期刊介绍:
Teaching Education is an interdisciplinary forum for innovative practices and research in teacher education. Submission of manuscripts from educational researchers, teacher educators and practicing teachers is encouraged. Contributions are invited which address social and cultural, practical and theoretical aspects of teacher education in university-, college-, and school-based contexts. The journal’s focus is on the challenges and possibilities of rapid social and cultural change for teacher education and, more broadly, for the transformation of education. These challenges include: the impact of new cultures and globalisation on curriculum and pedagogy; new collaborations and partnerships between universities, schools and other social service agencies; the consequences of new community and family configurations for teachers’ work; generational and cultural change in schools and teacher education institutions; new technologies and education; and the impact of higher education policy and funding on teacher education. Manuscripts addressing critical and theory-based research or scholarly reflections and debate on contemporary issues related to teacher education, will be considered. Papers should attempt to present research, innovative theoretical and/or practical insights in relevant current literature and debate.