Recording and Reporting School Attendance and Absence: International Comparative Views on Attendance Statistics in Sweden, Germany, England, and Japan

Q4 Social Sciences Orbis Scholae Pub Date : 2023-06-07 DOI:10.14712/23363177.2023.9
Susanne Kreitz-Sandberg, Åsa Backlund, U. Fredriksson, J. Isaksson, Maria Rasmusson, Malin Gren Landell
{"title":"Recording and Reporting School Attendance and Absence: International Comparative Views on Attendance Statistics in Sweden, Germany, England, and Japan","authors":"Susanne Kreitz-Sandberg, Åsa Backlund, U. Fredriksson, J. Isaksson, Maria Rasmusson, Malin Gren Landell","doi":"10.14712/23363177.2023.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is general consensus on the negative consequences of school non-attendance, but from an international comparative perspective, it is surprising how few studies have compared school attendance problems (SAPs) in different societies and education systems. In this article, SAPs are analysed through the lens of official statistics in four countries with different education systems: England, Japan, Germany (represented by two federal states), and Sweden. The purpose of this article is to investigate which data on school attendance and absence are available in four different countries and to facilitate a comparison between school attendance statistics and possibly different conceptualisations of SAPs. The article analyses statistics and official data collected by national school authorities and education agencies. Backgrounds within systems are provided and differences between the countries are analysed. England and Japan provide official data to the public on a regular basis, while Sweden and most federal states in Germany do not. A lower threshold for how much absence is considered problematic is found for Japan, England, and Thuringia (one of the investigated German federal states) compared to Sweden and Berlin (the other German federal state under study). Due to differences in recording and reporting school attendance, it is not possible to compare the quantitative extent of the problem or trends regarding SAPs across the four countries based on the available official school statistics.","PeriodicalId":38228,"journal":{"name":"Orbis Scholae","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orbis Scholae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2023.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There is general consensus on the negative consequences of school non-attendance, but from an international comparative perspective, it is surprising how few studies have compared school attendance problems (SAPs) in different societies and education systems. In this article, SAPs are analysed through the lens of official statistics in four countries with different education systems: England, Japan, Germany (represented by two federal states), and Sweden. The purpose of this article is to investigate which data on school attendance and absence are available in four different countries and to facilitate a comparison between school attendance statistics and possibly different conceptualisations of SAPs. The article analyses statistics and official data collected by national school authorities and education agencies. Backgrounds within systems are provided and differences between the countries are analysed. England and Japan provide official data to the public on a regular basis, while Sweden and most federal states in Germany do not. A lower threshold for how much absence is considered problematic is found for Japan, England, and Thuringia (one of the investigated German federal states) compared to Sweden and Berlin (the other German federal state under study). Due to differences in recording and reporting school attendance, it is not possible to compare the quantitative extent of the problem or trends regarding SAPs across the four countries based on the available official school statistics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
记录和报告学校出勤和缺勤:瑞典、德国、英国和日本出勤统计的国际比较观点
人们对不上学的负面影响达成了普遍共识,但从国际比较的角度来看,很少有研究比较不同社会和教育系统中的上学问题(SAPs)。在本文中,通过四个国家的官方统计数据来分析sap,这些国家具有不同的教育系统:英国、日本、德国(由两个联邦州代表)和瑞典。本文的目的是调查四个不同国家的出勤和缺勤数据,并促进出勤统计和sap可能不同概念之间的比较。本文分析了国家学校当局和教育机构收集的统计数据和官方数据。提供了系统内的背景,并分析了各国之间的差异。英国和日本定期向公众提供官方数据,而瑞典和德国的大多数联邦州则不这样做。与瑞典和柏林(正在研究的另一个德国联邦州)相比,日本、英国和图林根州(被调查的德国联邦州之一)的缺勤程度被认为是有问题的门槛较低。由于记录和报告学校出勤率方面的差异,根据现有的官方学校统计数据,不可能比较这四个国家中有关sap问题的数量程度或趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orbis Scholae
Orbis Scholae Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
S Eliškou Walterovou o minulosti a budoucnosti časopisu Orbis scholae Sociální klima učitelských sborů: Kvalitativní kvaziexperiment Sexualita jako riziko? Sexuální výchova v českých kurikulárních dokumentech Zpráva z desáté Mezinárodní vědecké konference Mezinárodní asociace pro hodnocení výsledků vzdělávání. Dublin, 27.−30. června 2023 Evropská unie v učebnicích občanského vzdělávání: limity, inovace a výzvy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1