Hands are frequently contaminated with fecal bacteria and enteric pathogens globally: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 6.7 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL ACS Environmental Au Pub Date : 2022-07-12 DOI:10.1101/2022.07.11.22277510
M. Cantrell, É. Sylvestre, R. Scheidegger, L. Curchod, D. Gute, J. Griffiths, Timothy Ryan Julian, A. Pickering
{"title":"Hands are frequently contaminated with fecal bacteria and enteric pathogens globally: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"M. Cantrell, É. Sylvestre, R. Scheidegger, L. Curchod, D. Gute, J. Griffiths, Timothy Ryan Julian, A. Pickering","doi":"10.1101/2022.07.11.22277510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Enteric pathogen infections are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, with the highest disease burden in low-income countries. Hands act as intermediaries in enteric pathogen transmission, transferring enteric pathogens between people and the environment through contact with food, water, and soil. In this study, we conducted a systematic review of prevalence and concentrations of fecal indicator microorganisms (i.e., E. coli, fecal coliform) and enteric pathogens on hands. We identified eighty studies, reporting 31,305 observations of hand contamination of people in community or household settings. The studies investigated 45 unique microorganisms, of which the most commonly reported indicators were E. coli and fecal coliforms. Hand contamination with 14 unique enteric pathogens was reported, with adenovirus and rotavirus as the most frequent. Mean E. coli prevalence on hands was 40% [95% CI 18%-62%] and mean fecal coliform prevalence was 42% [95% CI 16%-69%]. Hands were more likely to be contaminated with E. coli in low/lower-middle-income countries (prevalence: 49% [25% - 72%]) than in upper-middle/high-income countries (6% [1% - 12%]). In low/lower-middle income countries, E. coli prevalence was higher in urban compared to rural settings (52% mean prevalence in urban versus 33% in rural), although substantial heterogeneity between studies limited confidence in this finding. The review also highlighted the importance of standardizing hand sampling methods, as hand rinsing was associated with greater fecal contamination compared to other sampling methods.","PeriodicalId":29801,"journal":{"name":"ACS Environmental Au","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Environmental Au","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.11.22277510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Enteric pathogen infections are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, with the highest disease burden in low-income countries. Hands act as intermediaries in enteric pathogen transmission, transferring enteric pathogens between people and the environment through contact with food, water, and soil. In this study, we conducted a systematic review of prevalence and concentrations of fecal indicator microorganisms (i.e., E. coli, fecal coliform) and enteric pathogens on hands. We identified eighty studies, reporting 31,305 observations of hand contamination of people in community or household settings. The studies investigated 45 unique microorganisms, of which the most commonly reported indicators were E. coli and fecal coliforms. Hand contamination with 14 unique enteric pathogens was reported, with adenovirus and rotavirus as the most frequent. Mean E. coli prevalence on hands was 40% [95% CI 18%-62%] and mean fecal coliform prevalence was 42% [95% CI 16%-69%]. Hands were more likely to be contaminated with E. coli in low/lower-middle-income countries (prevalence: 49% [25% - 72%]) than in upper-middle/high-income countries (6% [1% - 12%]). In low/lower-middle income countries, E. coli prevalence was higher in urban compared to rural settings (52% mean prevalence in urban versus 33% in rural), although substantial heterogeneity between studies limited confidence in this finding. The review also highlighted the importance of standardizing hand sampling methods, as hand rinsing was associated with greater fecal contamination compared to other sampling methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在全球范围内,手经常被粪便细菌和肠道病原体污染:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
肠道病原体感染是全球发病率和死亡率的主要原因,低收入国家的疾病负担最高。手是肠道病原体传播的媒介,通过接触食物、水和土壤在人与环境之间传播肠道病原体。在这项研究中,我们对手上粪便指示微生物(即大肠杆菌、粪大肠菌群)和肠道病原体的流行率和浓度进行了系统审查。我们确定了80项研究,报告了31305例社区或家庭环境中的手部污染观察结果。这项研究调查了45种独特的微生物,其中最常见的指标是大肠杆菌和粪便大肠菌群。据报道,手部感染了14种独特的肠道病原体,其中腺病毒和轮状病毒最为常见。手上的平均大肠杆菌流行率为40%[95%CI 18%-62%],平均粪便大肠菌群流行率为42%[95%CI 16%-69%]。中低收入国家的手更容易被大肠杆菌污染(流行率:49%[25%-72%]),而中上收入/高收入国家为6%[1%-12%]。在中低收入国家,与农村相比,城市的大肠杆菌流行率更高(城市的平均流行率为52%,农村为33%),尽管研究之间的巨大异质性限制了对这一发现的信心。该审查还强调了标准化手部采样方法的重要性,因为与其他采样方法相比,手部冲洗会导致更大的粪便污染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Environmental Au
ACS Environmental Au 环境科学-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: ACS Environmental Au is an open access journal which publishes experimental research and theoretical results in all aspects of environmental science and technology both pure and applied. Short letters comprehensive articles reviews and perspectives are welcome in the following areas:Alternative EnergyAnthropogenic Impacts on Atmosphere Soil or WaterBiogeochemical CyclingBiomass or Wastes as ResourcesContaminants in Aquatic and Terrestrial EnvironmentsEnvironmental Data ScienceEcotoxicology and Public HealthEnergy and ClimateEnvironmental Modeling Processes and Measurement Methods and TechnologiesEnvironmental Nanotechnology and BiotechnologyGreen ChemistryGreen Manufacturing and EngineeringRisk assessment Regulatory Frameworks and Life-Cycle AssessmentsTreatment and Resource Recovery and Waste Management
期刊最新文献
Issue Publication Information Issue Editorial Masthead Recent Advances in Technologies for Phosphate Removal and Recovery: A Review Microbial Community Changes across Time and Space in a Constructed Wetland Issue Editorial Masthead
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1