Current Management Strategy of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

I. Perveen
{"title":"Current Management Strategy of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease","authors":"I. Perveen","doi":"10.3329/jemc.v9i1.39906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease worldwide and is becoming the most common indication for liver transplant in the Western world. The disease spectrum varies from steatosis to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), advanced fibrosis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The global prevalence of NAFLD and NASH varies from 24–25% and 1.5–6.45% respectively among general population. Despite the disease burden and adverse outcome of the condition, no highly effective treatment is currently available for NAFLD. Considering its global prevalence and impact clinicians and researchers from different scientific associations worldwide tried hard to develop high-quality international guidelines to improve the management of NAFLD patients in clinical practice. This paper aims to discuss the management options for NAFLD based on five different well-known international guidelines. These guidelines agree on many points and disagree on some points. Notably these guidelines differ in determining alcohol threshold for defining NAFLD, in screening strategies in high-risk patients, the non-invasive test proposed for the diagnosis of NAFLD and advanced fibrosis in patients with NAFLD, in the follow-up protocols and, finally, in the proposed pharmacological treatment strategy. \nJ Enam Med Col 2019; 9(1): 46-56","PeriodicalId":30472,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Enam Medical College","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3329/jemc.v9i1.39906","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Enam Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jemc.v9i1.39906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease worldwide and is becoming the most common indication for liver transplant in the Western world. The disease spectrum varies from steatosis to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), advanced fibrosis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The global prevalence of NAFLD and NASH varies from 24–25% and 1.5–6.45% respectively among general population. Despite the disease burden and adverse outcome of the condition, no highly effective treatment is currently available for NAFLD. Considering its global prevalence and impact clinicians and researchers from different scientific associations worldwide tried hard to develop high-quality international guidelines to improve the management of NAFLD patients in clinical practice. This paper aims to discuss the management options for NAFLD based on five different well-known international guidelines. These guidelines agree on many points and disagree on some points. Notably these guidelines differ in determining alcohol threshold for defining NAFLD, in screening strategies in high-risk patients, the non-invasive test proposed for the diagnosis of NAFLD and advanced fibrosis in patients with NAFLD, in the follow-up protocols and, finally, in the proposed pharmacological treatment strategy. J Enam Med Col 2019; 9(1): 46-56
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非酒精性脂肪性肝病的当前管理策略
非酒精性脂肪肝(NAFLD)是世界范围内最常见的慢性肝病病因,并正在成为西方世界最常见的肝移植指征。疾病范围从脂肪变性到非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)、晚期纤维化、肝硬化和肝细胞癌不等。全球普通人群中NAFLD和NASH的患病率分别为24-25%和1.5-6.45%。尽管有疾病负担和不良后果,但目前还没有针对NAFLD的高效治疗方法。考虑到其全球流行率和影响,来自世界各地不同科学协会的临床医生和研究人员努力制定高质量的国际指南,以改善临床实践中NAFLD患者的管理。本文旨在基于五种不同的知名国际准则来讨论NAFLD的管理选择。这些指导方针在许多方面达成一致,但在某些方面存在分歧。值得注意的是,这些指南在确定定义NAFLD的酒精阈值、高危患者的筛查策略、为诊断NAFLD和NAFLD患者晚期纤维化而提出的非侵入性测试、随访方案以及最后提出的药物治疗策略方面存在差异。搪瓷医学杂志2019;9(1):46-56
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
Unusual Site of Metastasis of Renal Cell Carcinoma Comparative Study of Topical Terbinafine 1% Cream versus Butenafine 1% Cream in the Treatment of Tinea Cruris From the desk of Editor-in-Chief Vol.11(1) College News Vol. 11(1) Outcome of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) Patients in the Intensive Care Unit of Enam Medical College & Hospital During the Period of July 2018 to May 2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1