Not your typical rate structure change: Heterogeneous water demand responses

IF 2.3 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Water Resources and Economics Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.wre.2021.100183
B. Stitzel , C.L. Rogers
{"title":"Not your typical rate structure change: Heterogeneous water demand responses","authors":"B. Stitzel ,&nbsp;C.L. Rogers","doi":"10.1016/j.wre.2021.100183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper investigates behavioral responses to a complicated and peculiar change in a municipality's water rate structure. In 2006, the City of Norman, Oklahoma Water Utility added a four-dollar fixed fee, reduced the number of block-rate tiers, and changed the rate structure from one that decreased and then increased across higher consumption block groups, to a strictly increasing rate structure. The changes in the volumetric rates were not uniform across the block rates. Customers at ultra-low volumes of consumption faced a one-penny reduction in their volumetric rate but experienced a large increase in total and average cost of water due to the addition of the relatively large fixed fee. In contrast, higher-volume users faced a less severe increase in the total and average charge per gallon consumed. To address the co-determination of average water charge and consumption choice, we estimate separate regressions for households grouped by pre-price change demand and the block group of last gallon consumed. Using detailed, monthly panel data for 23,408 residential water customers from 2002 to 2010 and a variety of model specifications, our results highlight heterogeneous responses across consumption groups. Ultra-low users responded to the price-regime change by increasing consumption whereas higher-volume users reduced consumption. Behavioral responses were found to be greater in the longer-run than shorter-run as expected.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48644,"journal":{"name":"Water Resources and Economics","volume":"36 ","pages":"Article 100183"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.wre.2021.100183","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Resources and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212428421000086","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper investigates behavioral responses to a complicated and peculiar change in a municipality's water rate structure. In 2006, the City of Norman, Oklahoma Water Utility added a four-dollar fixed fee, reduced the number of block-rate tiers, and changed the rate structure from one that decreased and then increased across higher consumption block groups, to a strictly increasing rate structure. The changes in the volumetric rates were not uniform across the block rates. Customers at ultra-low volumes of consumption faced a one-penny reduction in their volumetric rate but experienced a large increase in total and average cost of water due to the addition of the relatively large fixed fee. In contrast, higher-volume users faced a less severe increase in the total and average charge per gallon consumed. To address the co-determination of average water charge and consumption choice, we estimate separate regressions for households grouped by pre-price change demand and the block group of last gallon consumed. Using detailed, monthly panel data for 23,408 residential water customers from 2002 to 2010 and a variety of model specifications, our results highlight heterogeneous responses across consumption groups. Ultra-low users responded to the price-regime change by increasing consumption whereas higher-volume users reduced consumption. Behavioral responses were found to be greater in the longer-run than shorter-run as expected.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不是典型的费率结构变化:不同的用水需求反应
本文研究了一个复杂而特殊的城市水费结构变化的行为反应。2006年,俄克拉何马州诺曼市水务公司增加了一项4美元的固定费用,减少了街区费率等级的数量,并改变了费率结构,从在较高的消费街区群体中先降后升的费率结构,改为严格增加的费率结构。体积速率的变化在不同的块速率下是不均匀的。超低用水量的客户在用水量上减少了一便士,但由于增加了相对较大的固定费用,总水费和平均水费都大幅增加。相比之下,电量较大的用户在总耗电量和每加仑平均耗电量方面面临的增长幅度较小。为了解决平均水费和消费选择的共同决定,我们估计了按价格变化前需求分组的家庭和最后一加仑消费的块组的单独回归。利用2002年至2010年23,408个住宅用水客户的详细月度面板数据和各种模型规格,我们的结果突出了不同消费群体的异质反应。超低用户通过增加消费来应对价格机制的变化,而高容量用户则减少消费。正如预期的那样,长期的行为反应比短期的要大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Water Resources and Economics
Water Resources and Economics Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Water Resources and Economics is one of a series of specialist titles launched by the highly-regarded Water Research. For the purpose of sustainable water resources management, understanding the multiple connections and feedback mechanisms between water resources and the economy is crucial. Water Resources and Economics addresses the financial and economic dimensions associated with water resources use and governance, across different economic sectors like agriculture, energy, industry, shipping, recreation and urban and rural water supply, at local, regional and transboundary scale. Topics of interest include (but are not restricted to) the economics of: Aquatic ecosystem services- Blue economy- Climate change and flood risk management- Climate smart agriculture- Coastal management- Droughts and water scarcity- Environmental flows- Eutrophication- Food, water, energy nexus- Groundwater management- Hydropower generation- Hydrological risks and uncertainties- Marine resources- Nature-based solutions- Resource recovery- River restoration- Storm water harvesting- Transboundary water allocation- Urban water management- Wastewater treatment- Watershed management- Water health risks- Water pollution- Water quality management- Water security- Water stress- Water technology innovation.
期刊最新文献
Valuing the benefits of climate adaptation measures to reduce urban flooding: Community preferences for nature-based solutions Water scarcity and food security in the mediterranean region: The role of alternative water sources and controlled-environment agriculture Water resource tax policy and micro environmental performance improvement in China's water-intensive industries Identifying optimal funding allocations for public water infrastructure improvements under uncertainty Interregional watershed services: Valuation of the benefits of controlled embankment breaches to manage urban flood risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1