Response to Comments on "The Resurrection of Proto-Philippines"

IF 0.4 3区文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS OCEANIC LINGUISTICS Pub Date : 2021-02-16 DOI:10.1353/OL.2020.0020

Robert Blust

引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract:I am grateful to the four colleagues who have expressed their views on my argument for the reality of PPH, and I wish we could have had a larger number of contributors, with somewhat shorter and more relevant commentary in some cases to provide space for others.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

对“原菲律宾复活”评论的回应

摘要：我感谢四位同事对我关于PPH现实的论点表达了他们的看法，我希望我们能有更多的贡献者，在某些情况下提供更短、更相关的评论，为其他人提供空间。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

OCEANIC LINGUISTICS LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

44.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： Oceanic Linguistics is the only journal devoted exclusively to the study of the indigenous languages of the Oceanic area and parts of Southeast Asia. The thousand-odd languages within the scope of the journal are the aboriginal languages of Australia, the Papuan languages of New Guinea, and the languages of the Austronesian (or Malayo-Polynesian) family. Articles in Oceanic Linguistics cover issues of linguistic theory that pertain to languages of the area, report research on historical relations, or furnish new information about inadequately described languages.