Middle Age Settlement Structures of the South of Eastern Europe

IF 0.3 4区 历史学 N/A ARCHAEOLOGY ARCHAEOLOGY Pub Date : 2020-03-12 DOI:10.15407/archaeologyua2020.01.057
O. Motsia
{"title":"Middle Age Settlement Structures of the South of Eastern Europe","authors":"O. Motsia","doi":"10.15407/archaeologyua2020.01.057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past decades, in many countries of Europe and America, the concept of “archaeology of settlements” has been actively developed, which is based on the recognition of the enormous role of ancient settlements in the process of studying and reconstructing the socio-economic institutions of various diverse human groups and entire nations. This fully applies to the settlements of the south of Eastern Europe — first of all, to the territory of modern Ukraine — in medieval times. \nIn this area, numerous cities, castles, open settlements have been recorded, the history of which in many cases has a centuries-old extent. First of all, it concerns urban centers, which is established on the basis of written and archaeological data. Many of them carry out archaeological research, but the volumes of modern field work, are clearly insufficient to obtain new information for further reconstruction of their development in space and time. Moreover, they are concentrated mainly only in areas of modern construction work, and not where it is necessary for a common understanding of life here over the centuries. \nAt the same time, the issue of the interaction of composite structures in different territories and at different times remains relevant, which is especially important for explaining the effect of different mechanisms of functioning of all different-time state organisms: Kievan Rus, the Ukrainian Cossack State, or as a part of various foreign entities — the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, Rus and Samogitian, Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, etc. However, in general, all available information convincingly confirms the feudal nature of social structures of the middle ages time among indigenous population under consideration, in this case, territory. \nIn connection with the mentioned above, the clarification of the terminology currently used should undoubtedly be adjusted for its conformity with the new refined model of perception of a specific social structure, which has been constantly developing in a civilizational sense over the past many centuries under the conditions of an agricultural society, which undoubtedly left its mark on all social structures (including settlement) throughout the medieval period in the life of every nation. It is necessary to constantly remember and clarify for oneself the fundamental differences between agricultural and subsequent industrial societies, each of which had distinctive main features, although in some details both could overlap in some ways.","PeriodicalId":46362,"journal":{"name":"ARCHAEOLOGY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1090","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/archaeologyua2020.01.057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past decades, in many countries of Europe and America, the concept of “archaeology of settlements” has been actively developed, which is based on the recognition of the enormous role of ancient settlements in the process of studying and reconstructing the socio-economic institutions of various diverse human groups and entire nations. This fully applies to the settlements of the south of Eastern Europe — first of all, to the territory of modern Ukraine — in medieval times. In this area, numerous cities, castles, open settlements have been recorded, the history of which in many cases has a centuries-old extent. First of all, it concerns urban centers, which is established on the basis of written and archaeological data. Many of them carry out archaeological research, but the volumes of modern field work, are clearly insufficient to obtain new information for further reconstruction of their development in space and time. Moreover, they are concentrated mainly only in areas of modern construction work, and not where it is necessary for a common understanding of life here over the centuries. At the same time, the issue of the interaction of composite structures in different territories and at different times remains relevant, which is especially important for explaining the effect of different mechanisms of functioning of all different-time state organisms: Kievan Rus, the Ukrainian Cossack State, or as a part of various foreign entities — the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, Rus and Samogitian, Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, etc. However, in general, all available information convincingly confirms the feudal nature of social structures of the middle ages time among indigenous population under consideration, in this case, territory. In connection with the mentioned above, the clarification of the terminology currently used should undoubtedly be adjusted for its conformity with the new refined model of perception of a specific social structure, which has been constantly developing in a civilizational sense over the past many centuries under the conditions of an agricultural society, which undoubtedly left its mark on all social structures (including settlement) throughout the medieval period in the life of every nation. It is necessary to constantly remember and clarify for oneself the fundamental differences between agricultural and subsequent industrial societies, each of which had distinctive main features, although in some details both could overlap in some ways.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
东欧南部中世纪定居结构
在过去的几十年里,在欧洲和美洲的许多国家,“定居点考古”的概念得到了积极发展,这是基于对古代定居点在研究和重建各种不同人类群体和整个国家的社会经济制度过程中的巨大作用的认识。这完全适用于中世纪东欧南部的定居点——首先是现代乌克兰的领土。在这一地区,记录了许多城市、城堡和开放式定居点,在许多情况下,它们的历史已经有数百年的历史了。首先,它涉及城市中心,它是建立在书面和考古数据的基础上的。他们中的许多人进行考古研究,但大量的现代实地工作显然不足以获得新的信息,以进一步重建他们在空间和时间上的发展。此外,它们主要集中在现代建筑工程领域,而不是几个世纪以来对这里的生活有共同理解所必需的地方。与此同时,不同领土和不同时间的复合结构相互作用问题仍然具有相关性,这对于解释所有不同时间国家组织的不同运作机制的影响尤其重要:基辅罗斯、乌克兰哥萨克国家,或作为各种外国实体的一部分——立陶宛大公国,Rus和Samogitian、波兰立陶宛联邦等。然而,总的来说,所有可用的信息都令人信服地证实了中世纪土著人口社会结构的封建性质,在这种情况下,是领土。关于上述情况,对目前使用的术语的澄清无疑应该进行调整,以使其符合对特定社会结构的新的精细认知模式。过去几个世纪,在农业社会的条件下,特定社会结构在文明意义上不断发展,毫无疑问,它在整个中世纪时期每个国家的生活中都在所有社会结构(包括定居点)上留下了印记。有必要不断记住并澄清农业社会和随后的工业社会之间的根本区别,每一个社会都有独特的主要特征,尽管在某些细节上两者可能在某些方面重叠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ARCHAEOLOGY
ARCHAEOLOGY ARCHAEOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Final Palaeolithic of Zhytomyr Polissia New Hypothesized Musical Instruments of the European Neolithic The Marble Bust of Mithras Tauroctone from Olbia Coins from the “Orient” Excavation Site of the Olbian Necropolis Finds of Lithospermum Nuts at Archaeological Sites in Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1