Looking up and fitting in: Team leaders' and members' behaviors and attitudes toward the environment in an MNC

IF 6 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Human Resource Management Pub Date : 2023-01-18 DOI:10.1002/hrm.22163
Paul Baldassari, Sophie Eberhard, Yuan Jiang, Michael Muller-Camen, Lisa Obereder, Michael Schiffinger, Raik Thiele
{"title":"Looking up and fitting in: Team leaders' and members' behaviors and attitudes toward the environment in an MNC","authors":"Paul Baldassari,&nbsp;Sophie Eberhard,&nbsp;Yuan Jiang,&nbsp;Michael Muller-Camen,&nbsp;Lisa Obereder,&nbsp;Michael Schiffinger,&nbsp;Raik Thiele","doi":"10.1002/hrm.22163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As an emerging topic in human resource management (HRM) research, organizational citizenship behavior for the environment (OCBE) and workgroup green advocacy (WGGA) have been studied as a proxy of the environmental performance of organizations as well as a potential way for companies to assess the impact of their environmental strategies and initiatives. Viewing OCBE and WGGA as green-focused knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics and building on leader-member exchange theory, we examined the effects of leaders' OCBE and WGGA, person-supervisor fit (PSF), and person-group fit (PGF) as well as their potential interactions on members' OCBE and WGGA. To minimize the potential impact of different company strategies, the study was conducted in one MNC using a sample of 269 members from 64 teams. The results revealed that PSF and especially PGF were associated with members' OCBE and WGGA, but leaders' OCBE was a stronger predictor of members' OCBE and WGGA than leaders' WGGA. Contrary to our prediction, no moderating effect of PSF or PGF was found for the associations between leaders' and members' WGGA and OCBE. Together, these findings shed light on the differential trickle-down effects of leaders' perceptions and behaviors in the context of environmental management. As for the implications for HRM practitioners, our findings suggest companies may focus on leaders' OCBE and WGGA as well as on PSF and PGF independently as the means to shaping team members' OCBE and WGGA to support environmental strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48310,"journal":{"name":"Human Resource Management","volume":"62 3","pages":"267-282"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hrm.22163","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resource Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hrm.22163","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As an emerging topic in human resource management (HRM) research, organizational citizenship behavior for the environment (OCBE) and workgroup green advocacy (WGGA) have been studied as a proxy of the environmental performance of organizations as well as a potential way for companies to assess the impact of their environmental strategies and initiatives. Viewing OCBE and WGGA as green-focused knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics and building on leader-member exchange theory, we examined the effects of leaders' OCBE and WGGA, person-supervisor fit (PSF), and person-group fit (PGF) as well as their potential interactions on members' OCBE and WGGA. To minimize the potential impact of different company strategies, the study was conducted in one MNC using a sample of 269 members from 64 teams. The results revealed that PSF and especially PGF were associated with members' OCBE and WGGA, but leaders' OCBE was a stronger predictor of members' OCBE and WGGA than leaders' WGGA. Contrary to our prediction, no moderating effect of PSF or PGF was found for the associations between leaders' and members' WGGA and OCBE. Together, these findings shed light on the differential trickle-down effects of leaders' perceptions and behaviors in the context of environmental management. As for the implications for HRM practitioners, our findings suggest companies may focus on leaders' OCBE and WGGA as well as on PSF and PGF independently as the means to shaping team members' OCBE and WGGA to support environmental strategies.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正视和融入:跨国公司团队领导者和成员对环境的行为和态度
作为人力资源管理(HRM)研究中的一个新兴课题,组织环境公民行为(OCBE)和工作组绿色倡导(WGGA)作为组织环境绩效的代表以及公司评估其环境战略和举措影响的潜在方式进行了研究。基于领导-成员交换理论,我们将组织的外部性和WGGA视为以绿色为中心的知识、技能、能力等特征,考察了领导者的外部性和WGGA、个人-主管契合度(PSF)和个人-团队契合度(PGF)及其相互作用对组织成员外部性和WGGA的影响。为了尽量减少不同公司战略的潜在影响,这项研究是在一家跨国公司进行的,样本来自64个团队的269名成员。结果表明,PSF,尤其是PGF与成员的OCBE和WGGA相关,但领导者的OCBE比领导者的WGGA更能预测成员的OCBE和WGGA。与我们的预测相反,我们没有发现PSF或PGF对领导和成员的WGGA和OCBE之间的关联有调节作用。总之,这些发现揭示了领导者在环境管理背景下的感知和行为的不同涓滴效应。至于对人力资源管理从业者的影响,我们的研究结果表明,公司可能会单独关注领导者的OCBE和WGGA,以及PSF和PGF,作为塑造团队成员的OCBE和WGGA以支持环境战略的手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Covering the broad spectrum of contemporary human resource management, this journal provides academics and practicing managers with the latest concepts, tools, and information for effective problem solving and decision making in this field. Broad in scope, it explores issues of societal, organizational, and individual relevance. Journal articles discuss new theories, new techniques, case studies, models, and research trends of particular significance to practicing HR managers
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information The Consequences of Age Discrimination via Perceived Work Ability: Downstream Effects on Well-Being, Performance, and Motivation A Strengths-Based Human Resource Management Approach to Neurodiversity: A Multi-Actor Qualitative Study Career Guidance and Employment Issues for Neurodivergent Individuals: A Scoping Review and Stakeholder Consultation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1