Effect of Logotherapy Based on Rumi’s Thoughts on Anxiety, Depression, and Distress in Frontline Nurses During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized Controlled Trial

IF 0.5 Q4 NURSING Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences Pub Date : 2023-08-21 DOI:10.5812/jnms-137898
F. Alipour, Asghar Norouzi, S. Hosseini, Hamid Sharif Nia, M. Rezapour
{"title":"Effect of Logotherapy Based on Rumi’s Thoughts on Anxiety, Depression, and Distress in Frontline Nurses During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"F. Alipour, Asghar Norouzi, S. Hosseini, Hamid Sharif Nia, M. Rezapour","doi":"10.5812/jnms-137898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: With the spread of infectious diseases, especially coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), healthcare workers are vulnerable to mental health problems. Culture-based interventions in such critical situations are highly effective for the individuals in that cultural context. Objectives: The current study aimed to investigate the effect of Logotherapy Based on Rumi’s Thoughts (LBRT) on depression, anxiety, and distress in frontline nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: The present study employed a quasi-experimental controlled pre-test-post-test design with a 2-month follow-up. This interventional study was conducted on frontline nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic 2020. Imam Khomeini and Fatemeh Zahra hospitals were selected as the research samples, as they were the main educational and medical centers of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Mazandaran, Iran, and provincial referral centers. A total of 32 eligible individuals were selected for experimental (n = 16) and control (n = 16) groups through the convenience sampling method. The data were collected using the Impact of Event Scale-Revised and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Logotherapy Based on Rumi’s Thoughts included eight sessions of 90 minutes. The control group did not receive any intervention during the study. The data were analyzed using repeated-measures one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: The results revealed a statistically significant difference between the two groups. The intervention group exhibited lower levels of depression and anxiety among the frontline nurses at the post-test and 2-month follow-up than the control group (P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of distress at the post-test and 2-month follow-up (P > 0.001). Conclusions: The findings showed that LBRT improved anxiety and depression among frontline nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, this intervention did not significantly affect frontline nurses’ distress during the COVID-19 crisis. Further studies should examine the effectiveness of culture-based interventions in critical situations.","PeriodicalId":42130,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/jnms-137898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With the spread of infectious diseases, especially coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), healthcare workers are vulnerable to mental health problems. Culture-based interventions in such critical situations are highly effective for the individuals in that cultural context. Objectives: The current study aimed to investigate the effect of Logotherapy Based on Rumi’s Thoughts (LBRT) on depression, anxiety, and distress in frontline nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: The present study employed a quasi-experimental controlled pre-test-post-test design with a 2-month follow-up. This interventional study was conducted on frontline nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic 2020. Imam Khomeini and Fatemeh Zahra hospitals were selected as the research samples, as they were the main educational and medical centers of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Mazandaran, Iran, and provincial referral centers. A total of 32 eligible individuals were selected for experimental (n = 16) and control (n = 16) groups through the convenience sampling method. The data were collected using the Impact of Event Scale-Revised and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Logotherapy Based on Rumi’s Thoughts included eight sessions of 90 minutes. The control group did not receive any intervention during the study. The data were analyzed using repeated-measures one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: The results revealed a statistically significant difference between the two groups. The intervention group exhibited lower levels of depression and anxiety among the frontline nurses at the post-test and 2-month follow-up than the control group (P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of distress at the post-test and 2-month follow-up (P > 0.001). Conclusions: The findings showed that LBRT improved anxiety and depression among frontline nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, this intervention did not significantly affect frontline nurses’ distress during the COVID-19 crisis. Further studies should examine the effectiveness of culture-based interventions in critical situations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于鲁米思想的意义疗法对COVID-19大流行期间一线护士焦虑、抑郁和痛苦的影响:一项随机对照试验
背景:随着传染病,特别是2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的传播,医护人员容易出现心理健康问题。在这种危急情况下,基于文化的干预措施对该文化背景下的个人非常有效。目的:本研究旨在探讨基于鲁米思想的意义疗法(LBRT)对新冠肺炎大流行期间一线护士抑郁、焦虑和痛苦的影响。方法:本研究采用准实验控制的前测后测设计,随访2个月。本介入性研究是在2020年COVID-19大流行期间对一线护士进行的。选取伊玛目霍梅尼医院和法特梅赫扎赫拉医院作为研究样本,因为它们是伊朗马赞达兰医学科学大学的主要教育和医疗中心以及省级转诊中心。采用方便抽样法,选取符合条件的32人作为实验组(n = 16)和对照组(n = 16)。采用事件影响量表和医院焦虑抑郁量表收集数据。基于鲁米思想的意义疗法包括8个90分钟的疗程。对照组在研究期间未接受任何干预。采用重复测量单因素方差分析(ANOVA)对数据进行分析。结果:两组比较差异有统计学意义。干预组一线护士在测试后及2个月随访时抑郁、焦虑水平均低于对照组(P < 0.001)。然而,在测试后和2个月的随访中,两组在痛苦方面没有显著差异(P < 0.001)。结论:研究结果显示,LBRT改善了COVID-19大流行期间一线护士的焦虑和抑郁。然而,这种干预并没有显著影响一线护士在COVID-19危机期间的痛苦。进一步的研究应检查基于文化的干预措施在危急情况下的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparing the Effects of Oral and Vaginal Evening Primrose Capsules with Concurrent Labor Induction and Exclusive Labor Induction on Bishop Score and Some Labor Outcomes: A Triple-Blind Clinical Trial Social Determinants of Reproductive Age Women's Sexual Health: A Scoping Review Effect of Collaborative Care on Fear of Disease Progression in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparison of Quality of Infant Care and Transition Difficulty to Motherhood Between Adolescent and Young Mothers in Karaj, Iran Providing Nursing Care to Patients with Mental Disorders Based on King's Goal Attainment Theory: A Quasi-Experimental Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1