Beyond Concept: Derrida and Levinas on Metaphor

IF 0.2 3区 哲学 N/A PHILOSOPHY FILOZOFIA Pub Date : 2023-04-13 DOI:10.31577/filozofia.2023.78.4.5
Alžbeta Kuchtová
{"title":"Beyond Concept: Derrida and Levinas on Metaphor","authors":"Alžbeta Kuchtová","doi":"10.31577/filozofia.2023.78.4.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to examine Levinas’s and Derrida’s concept of metaphor. The paper compares their account on metaphor that shows well their position toward religion. Both authors agree that metaphor is connected to the realm of “beyond concept” but Levinas identifies the metaphor, in Carnets de Captiv-ité , with monotheistic divinity. Derrida does not. The conclusion is that Derrida cannot be considered negative theologian nor religious thinker.","PeriodicalId":44340,"journal":{"name":"FILOZOFIA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FILOZOFIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2023.78.4.5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to examine Levinas’s and Derrida’s concept of metaphor. The paper compares their account on metaphor that shows well their position toward religion. Both authors agree that metaphor is connected to the realm of “beyond concept” but Levinas identifies the metaphor, in Carnets de Captiv-ité , with monotheistic divinity. Derrida does not. The conclusion is that Derrida cannot be considered negative theologian nor religious thinker.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越概念:德里达和莱维纳斯的隐喻
本文的目的是考察列维纳斯和德里达的隐喻概念。本文比较了他们对隐喻的描述,很好地说明了他们对宗教的立场。两位作者都认为隐喻与“超越概念”的领域有关,但列维纳斯在《Carnets de captiva - it》中将隐喻与一神论的神性联系在一起。德里达没有。结论是,德里达不能被认为是消极的神学家,也不能被认为是宗教思想家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
FILOZOFIA
FILOZOFIA PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
66.70%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Filozofia publishes original articles in a wide range of areas including metaphysics, epistemology, history of philosophy, social and political philosophy, philosophy of mind, ethics, philosophy of religion and related disciplines. The journal is published monthly, with the exception of July and August, i.e. ten issues yearly. The articles are accepted in Slovak, Czech and English languages.
期刊最新文献
Reconsidering Agency in the Age of AI Jana Benická: Staroveká čínska filozofia a myslenie Cesta k inteligencii: Nadmerné zjednodušenie a samokontrola Bridges Without Foundation? Why the Use of AI Tools in Academia Needs to Build on Ethics First AI Text Generators and the Truth Paradigm: Considerations from a Phenomenological Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1