Digital topics on cultural heritage investigated: how can data-driven and data-guided methods support to identify current topics and trends in digital heritage?

Q1 Arts and Humanities Built Heritage Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-29 DOI:10.1186/s43238-021-00045-7
Sander Münster, Ronja Utescher, Selda Ulutas Aydogan
{"title":"Digital topics on cultural heritage investigated: how can data-driven and data-guided methods support to identify current topics and trends in digital heritage?","authors":"Sander Münster, Ronja Utescher, Selda Ulutas Aydogan","doi":"10.1186/s43238-021-00045-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In research and policies, the identification of trends as well as emerging topics and topics in decline is an important source of information for both academic and innovation management. Since at present policy analysis mostly employs qualitative research methods, the following article presents and assesses different approaches - trend analysis based on questionnaires, quantitative bibliometric surveys, the use of computer-linguistic approaches and machine learning and qualitative investigations. Against this backdrop, this article examines digital applications in cultural heritage and, in particular, built heritage via various investigative frameworks to identify topics of relevance and trendlines, mainly for European Union (EU)-based research and policies. Furthermore, this article exemplifies and assesses the specific opportunities and limitations of the different methodical approaches against the backdrop of data-driven vs. data-guided analytical frameworks. As its major findings, our study shows that both research and policies related to digital applications for cultural heritage are mainly driven by the availability of new technologies. Since policies focus on meta-topics such as digitisation, openness or automation, the research descriptors are more granular. In general, data-driven approaches are promising for identifying topics and trendlines and even predicting the development of near future trends. Conversely, qualitative approaches are able to answer \"why\" questions with regard to whether topics are emerging due to disruptive innovations or due to new terminologies or whether topics are becoming obsolete because they are common knowledge, as is the case for the term \"internet\".</p>","PeriodicalId":33925,"journal":{"name":"Built Heritage","volume":" ","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8714456/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Built Heritage","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-021-00045-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In research and policies, the identification of trends as well as emerging topics and topics in decline is an important source of information for both academic and innovation management. Since at present policy analysis mostly employs qualitative research methods, the following article presents and assesses different approaches - trend analysis based on questionnaires, quantitative bibliometric surveys, the use of computer-linguistic approaches and machine learning and qualitative investigations. Against this backdrop, this article examines digital applications in cultural heritage and, in particular, built heritage via various investigative frameworks to identify topics of relevance and trendlines, mainly for European Union (EU)-based research and policies. Furthermore, this article exemplifies and assesses the specific opportunities and limitations of the different methodical approaches against the backdrop of data-driven vs. data-guided analytical frameworks. As its major findings, our study shows that both research and policies related to digital applications for cultural heritage are mainly driven by the availability of new technologies. Since policies focus on meta-topics such as digitisation, openness or automation, the research descriptors are more granular. In general, data-driven approaches are promising for identifying topics and trendlines and even predicting the development of near future trends. Conversely, qualitative approaches are able to answer "why" questions with regard to whether topics are emerging due to disruptive innovations or due to new terminologies or whether topics are becoming obsolete because they are common knowledge, as is the case for the term "internet".

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文化遗产的数字主题调查:数据驱动和数据指导的方法如何支持确定数字遗产的当前主题和趋势?
在研究和政策中,确定趋势以及新兴主题和衰退主题是学术和创新管理的重要信息来源。由于目前政策分析主要采用定性研究方法,以下文章提出并评估了不同的方法-基于问卷调查的趋势分析,定量文献计量调查,使用计算机语言方法和机器学习以及定性调查。在此背景下,本文通过各种调查框架研究数字在文化遗产中的应用,特别是建筑遗产,以确定相关主题和趋势,主要针对欧盟(EU)的研究和政策。此外,本文举例说明并评估了在数据驱动与数据指导分析框架的背景下,不同方法方法的具体机会和局限性。本研究的主要发现是,与文化遗产数字化应用相关的研究和政策主要受到新技术可用性的推动。由于政策侧重于诸如数字化、开放或自动化等元主题,因此研究描述符更加细化。一般来说,数据驱动的方法很有希望确定主题和趋势线,甚至预测近期趋势的发展。相反,定性方法能够回答“为什么”的问题,比如话题是由于颠覆性创新出现的,还是由于新的术语出现的,还是因为它们是常识而过时的,就像“互联网”这个词一样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Built Heritage
Built Heritage Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Heritage, urban form and spatial resignification in the production of sustainable Olympic legacies: an urban design analysis of the Rio de Janeiro Olympic Games Industrial heritage in the hosting of mega-events: assessing the potential for urban redevelopment and social change? Evolving heritage in modern China: transforming religious sites for preservation and development The sound heritage of Kotagede: the evolving soundscape of a living museum The politics of heritage in a river-city: imperial, hyper-colonial, and globalising Tianjin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1