Innovation in regulated electricity networks: Incentivising tasks with highly uncertain outcomes

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting Competition and Regulation in Network Industries Pub Date : 2020-03-04 DOI:10.1177/1783591720906582
R. Poudineh, D. Peng, Seyed Reza Mirnezami
{"title":"Innovation in regulated electricity networks: Incentivising tasks with highly uncertain outcomes","authors":"R. Poudineh, D. Peng, Seyed Reza Mirnezami","doi":"10.1177/1783591720906582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditional regulatory models of natural monopoly network utilities are designed to incentivise cost-efficiency, subject to the firm achieving a certain level of reliability. With the rise of decarbonisation as a key policy goal, facilitating innovation in electricity networks has become of vital importance. Innovation and cost-efficiency may overlap and exhibit the same risk profile. However, we show that when there is a difference in their risk profile, incentivising these two tasks using the same incentive scheme is ineffective. This means incentive regulations need to be enhanced with additional modules that take into account the level of risk to which companies are exposed to for their stage of innovation activity. We also demonstrate that the issue of risk can distort the outcome of a competitive scheme for allocating innovation funds when bidders are heterogeneous in their risk attitude and there is uncertainty about recovering initial investments needed to prepare the project proposal. Thus, competitive schemes need to be designed such that they factor in risk attitude heterogeneity among bidders.","PeriodicalId":38329,"journal":{"name":"Competition and Regulation in Network Industries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1783591720906582","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Competition and Regulation in Network Industries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1783591720906582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Traditional regulatory models of natural monopoly network utilities are designed to incentivise cost-efficiency, subject to the firm achieving a certain level of reliability. With the rise of decarbonisation as a key policy goal, facilitating innovation in electricity networks has become of vital importance. Innovation and cost-efficiency may overlap and exhibit the same risk profile. However, we show that when there is a difference in their risk profile, incentivising these two tasks using the same incentive scheme is ineffective. This means incentive regulations need to be enhanced with additional modules that take into account the level of risk to which companies are exposed to for their stage of innovation activity. We also demonstrate that the issue of risk can distort the outcome of a competitive scheme for allocating innovation funds when bidders are heterogeneous in their risk attitude and there is uncertainty about recovering initial investments needed to prepare the project proposal. Thus, competitive schemes need to be designed such that they factor in risk attitude heterogeneity among bidders.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
监管电网的创新:结果高度不确定的激励任务
自然垄断网络公用事业的传统监管模式旨在激励成本效率,前提是企业达到一定的可靠性水平。随着脱碳作为一项关键政策目标的兴起,促进电网创新变得至关重要。创新和成本效率可能重叠,并表现出相同的风险状况。然而,我们发现,当他们的风险状况存在差异时,使用相同的激励方案来激励这两项任务是无效的。这意味着需要通过额外的模块来加强激励法规,这些模块考虑到公司在创新活动阶段面临的风险水平。我们还证明,当投标人的风险态度不同,并且在回收准备项目建议书所需的初始投资方面存在不确定性时,风险问题可能会扭曲创新资金分配竞争方案的结果。因此,竞争性方案的设计需要考虑投标人之间的风险态度异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Competition and Regulation in Network Industries
Competition and Regulation in Network Industries Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (all)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Regulatory lag, efficiency, and performance. Lessons from a case study Legal and ownership unbundling in the Turkish natural gas market: A comparative analysis Network utility price regulation in Australia in the pre-first world war years Experimenting with co-ownership of energy storage facilities - A case study of the Netherlands Strategic interaction between wholesale and ancillary service markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1