Governance of Ecosystem Services: A Plea for a New Perspective on Ecosystem Services for Land-use Planners

IF 0.4 Q4 GEOGRAPHY European Spatial Research and Policy Pub Date : 2022-06-30 DOI:10.18778/1231-1952.29.1.03
Konrad Gray, Günden Savaşçı, Sonja Deppisch
{"title":"Governance of Ecosystem Services: A Plea for a New Perspective on Ecosystem Services for Land-use Planners","authors":"Konrad Gray, Günden Savaşçı, Sonja Deppisch","doi":"10.18778/1231-1952.29.1.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Integrating the ecosystem services (ES) concept into land-use planning has been the focus of researchers in recent years. Forwarding this objective in order to foster human well-being, urban and regional planning became the focus of research efforts. Furthermore, governance research has been beneficial in studying the coupling of ecosystem services and planning processes. Thus, in this explorative case study we have analysed the governance of urban and regional planning in two case studies – Rostock and Munich – in order to gain insights about the role and value of ecosystem services among planning actors. We conducted semi-structured interviews to identify relevant parameters to facilitate integrational approaches of ecosystem services into decision-making in the context of cross-sectoral urban and regional planning. Based on our results, we argue for a change of the perspective of ES within planning practice. Instead of ecological or economic endeavours, the contribution of ES to human well-being should be in the centre of attention. Human well-being as an overarching aspiration may have the potential to shift ecosystem services from sectoral to cross-sectoral planning.","PeriodicalId":43719,"journal":{"name":"European Spatial Research and Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spatial Research and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.29.1.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Integrating the ecosystem services (ES) concept into land-use planning has been the focus of researchers in recent years. Forwarding this objective in order to foster human well-being, urban and regional planning became the focus of research efforts. Furthermore, governance research has been beneficial in studying the coupling of ecosystem services and planning processes. Thus, in this explorative case study we have analysed the governance of urban and regional planning in two case studies – Rostock and Munich – in order to gain insights about the role and value of ecosystem services among planning actors. We conducted semi-structured interviews to identify relevant parameters to facilitate integrational approaches of ecosystem services into decision-making in the context of cross-sectoral urban and regional planning. Based on our results, we argue for a change of the perspective of ES within planning practice. Instead of ecological or economic endeavours, the contribution of ES to human well-being should be in the centre of attention. Human well-being as an overarching aspiration may have the potential to shift ecosystem services from sectoral to cross-sectoral planning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生态系统服务治理:为土地利用规划者提供生态系统服务的新视角
将生态系统服务(ES)概念纳入土地利用规划是近年来研究人员关注的焦点。为了促进人类福祉,城市和区域规划成为研究工作的重点。此外,治理研究有利于研究生态系统服务与规划过程的耦合。因此,在本探索性案例研究中,我们在罗斯托克和慕尼黑两个案例研究中分析了城市和区域规划的治理,以深入了解生态系统服务在规划参与者中的作用和价值。我们进行了半结构化访谈,以确定相关参数,促进在跨部门城市和区域规划的背景下,将生态系统服务纳入决策。基于我们的研究结果,我们主张在规划实践中改变ES的观点。ES对人类福祉的贡献应该成为关注的焦点,而不是生态或经济努力。人类福祉作为一项总体愿望,可能有可能将生态系统服务从部门规划转变为跨部门规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
7
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Modelling the regional variability of building activity in Greece: A multi-level multinomial logistic regression approach The mapping of forms of spatial planning: An instrument-oriented tool for the international comparison of spatial planning activities Centres and peripheries reflected in distribution patterns of EU cohesion policy funding on the example of the Baranya county, Hungary The future of wellness tourism after COVID-19 AHP and TOPSIS as methods assessing the attractiveness of urban parks: The case of Lodz, Poland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1