The Strange Case of Susan Brotes: Rhetoric, Gender, and Authorship in John Fletcher’s The Tamer Tamed, or How (Not) to Identify an Early Modern Playwright

Q3 Arts and Humanities Renaissance Drama Pub Date : 2019-08-13 DOI:10.1086/705890
Gordon McMullan
{"title":"The Strange Case of Susan Brotes: Rhetoric, Gender, and Authorship in John Fletcher’s The Tamer Tamed, or How (Not) to Identify an Early Modern Playwright","authors":"Gordon McMullan","doi":"10.1086/705890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ho is “John Fletcher”? Does he have a clearly distinguishable writerly identity? I believed so when, a quarter of a century ago, I published w a monograph about this resolutely collaborative playwright, setting out to distinguish him critically from Beaumont, Field, Massinger, Shakespeare, and his other purported coadjutors and addressing the “unease” I believed to be characteristic both of Fletcherian writing and of subsequent responses to his work. I say “critically” because I was writing a work of historicist literary criti-","PeriodicalId":53676,"journal":{"name":"Renaissance Drama","volume":"47 1","pages":"177 - 200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/705890","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renaissance Drama","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/705890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ho is “John Fletcher”? Does he have a clearly distinguishable writerly identity? I believed so when, a quarter of a century ago, I published w a monograph about this resolutely collaborative playwright, setting out to distinguish him critically from Beaumont, Field, Massinger, Shakespeare, and his other purported coadjutors and addressing the “unease” I believed to be characteristic both of Fletcherian writing and of subsequent responses to his work. I say “critically” because I was writing a work of historicist literary criti-
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
苏珊·布罗德斯的怪案:约翰·弗莱彻的《驯服者》中的修辞、性别和作者身份,或如何(不)识别一位早期现代剧作家
“约翰·弗莱彻”是谁?他在写作上有明显的身份吗?四分之一个世纪前,我出版了一本关于这位坚定合作的剧作家的专著,试图将他与博蒙特、菲尔德、马辛格、莎士比亚和其他所谓的合作者进行批判性区分,并解决我认为弗莱彻的写作和随后对其作品的回应所特有的“不安”。我之所以说“批判性”,是因为我在写一部历史主义文学批评的作品-
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Renaissance Drama
Renaissance Drama Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Cosmic Conversion and Timon’s Block Affective Ecologies: Afterword Female Masquers and Ambiguity in Timon of Athens Imaginary Puissance: Historicizing “Setting” and Discourses of Control Tamburlaine, Able-Bodiedness, and the Skills of the Early Modern Player
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1