The Strange Case of Susan Brotes: Rhetoric, Gender, and Authorship in John Fletcher’s The Tamer Tamed, or How (Not) to Identify an Early Modern Playwright
{"title":"The Strange Case of Susan Brotes: Rhetoric, Gender, and Authorship in John Fletcher’s The Tamer Tamed, or How (Not) to Identify an Early Modern Playwright","authors":"Gordon McMullan","doi":"10.1086/705890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ho is “John Fletcher”? Does he have a clearly distinguishable writerly identity? I believed so when, a quarter of a century ago, I published w a monograph about this resolutely collaborative playwright, setting out to distinguish him critically from Beaumont, Field, Massinger, Shakespeare, and his other purported coadjutors and addressing the “unease” I believed to be characteristic both of Fletcherian writing and of subsequent responses to his work. I say “critically” because I was writing a work of historicist literary criti-","PeriodicalId":53676,"journal":{"name":"Renaissance Drama","volume":"47 1","pages":"177 - 200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/705890","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renaissance Drama","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/705890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ho is “John Fletcher”? Does he have a clearly distinguishable writerly identity? I believed so when, a quarter of a century ago, I published w a monograph about this resolutely collaborative playwright, setting out to distinguish him critically from Beaumont, Field, Massinger, Shakespeare, and his other purported coadjutors and addressing the “unease” I believed to be characteristic both of Fletcherian writing and of subsequent responses to his work. I say “critically” because I was writing a work of historicist literary criti-