Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Arabic Project for the Epidemiological Analysis of Critical Care Patients (PAEEC) scale in individuals with traumatic brain injury in Lebanon.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Applied Neuropsychology-Adult Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-04-27 DOI:10.1080/23279095.2022.2062671
Marwa Summaka, Hiba Zein, Rama Daoud, Ibrahim Naim, Youssef Fares, Zeina Nasser
{"title":"Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Arabic Project for the Epidemiological Analysis of Critical Care Patients (PAEEC) scale in individuals with traumatic brain injury in Lebanon.","authors":"Marwa Summaka, Hiba Zein, Rama Daoud, Ibrahim Naim, Youssef Fares, Zeina Nasser","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2022.2062671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study is to cross-culturally adapt the Project for the Epidemiological Analysis of Critical Care Patients (PAEEC) Quality of Life (QoL) scale into the Arabic language and to examine its clinimetric properties, including validity and reliability among Lebanese native speaker with traumatic brain injury (TBI). This is a cross-sectional study including 49 men with TBI aged between 20 and 59 years. The Arabic version of the PAEEC (PAEEC-A) was administered to the subjects or their primary caregiver as well as the Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36). The internal consistency, test-retest reliability, content, construct and convergent validity were evaluated. The PAEEC-A displayed high internal consistency (Chronbach's alpha = 0.916) and test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation coefficient = 0.966). Exploratory factor analysis extracted a 3-factor model that explained 68.48% of the total variance. As for the convergent validity, Spearman correlations between the PAEEC-A total score and the physical and mental components of the SF-36 were -0.788 and -0.794, respectively (<i>p</i>-value < 0.0001 for both). The findings indicate that the PAEEC-A has robust clinimetric properties and is a valid and reliable quality of life measure among Lebanese men with traumatic brain injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2022.2062671","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to cross-culturally adapt the Project for the Epidemiological Analysis of Critical Care Patients (PAEEC) Quality of Life (QoL) scale into the Arabic language and to examine its clinimetric properties, including validity and reliability among Lebanese native speaker with traumatic brain injury (TBI). This is a cross-sectional study including 49 men with TBI aged between 20 and 59 years. The Arabic version of the PAEEC (PAEEC-A) was administered to the subjects or their primary caregiver as well as the Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36). The internal consistency, test-retest reliability, content, construct and convergent validity were evaluated. The PAEEC-A displayed high internal consistency (Chronbach's alpha = 0.916) and test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation coefficient = 0.966). Exploratory factor analysis extracted a 3-factor model that explained 68.48% of the total variance. As for the convergent validity, Spearman correlations between the PAEEC-A total score and the physical and mental components of the SF-36 were -0.788 and -0.794, respectively (p-value < 0.0001 for both). The findings indicate that the PAEEC-A has robust clinimetric properties and is a valid and reliable quality of life measure among Lebanese men with traumatic brain injury.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黎巴嫩创伤性脑损伤患者重症监护患者流行病学分析阿拉伯语项目(PAEEC)量表的跨文化适应和验证。
本研究的目的是跨文化调整危重病患者流行病学分析项目(PAEEC)生活质量(QoL)量表到阿拉伯语,并检查其临床计量特性,包括黎巴嫩母语人士创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的有效性和可靠性。这是一项横断面研究,包括49名年龄在20到59岁之间的TBI患者。对受试者或其主要照顾者进行了阿拉伯语版PAEEC (PAEEC- a)以及简短健康调查36 (SF-36)。评估了内部一致性、重测信度、内容、结构和收敛效度。PAEEC-A具有较高的内部一致性(Chronbach’s alpha = 0.916)和重测信度(类内相关系数= 0.966)。探索性因子分析提取了一个3因素模型,解释了总方差的68.48%。在收敛效度方面,PAEEC-A总分与SF-36的生理和心理成分的Spearman相关系数分别为-0.788和-0.794 (p值均< 0.0001)。研究结果表明,PAEEC-A具有强大的临床特性,是黎巴嫩创伤性脑损伤男性的有效和可靠的生活质量测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
期刊最新文献
Introduction and preliminary psychometric evaluation of the assessment of functional capacity interview for older adults. Test of memory Malingering 2nd Edition: Normative data from cognitively intact adults living in Spain. Depressive symptoms in Brazilian Parkinson's disease patients treated with subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation: A Cross-Sectional study. Goal attainment in individual and group-based neuropsychological interventions for young adults with dyslexia in a randomized controlled trial. Cognitive processing differences between stereotype activation and semantic activation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1