Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Arabic Project for the Epidemiological Analysis of Critical Care Patients (PAEEC) scale in individuals with traumatic brain injury in Lebanon.
{"title":"Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Arabic Project for the Epidemiological Analysis of Critical Care Patients (PAEEC) scale in individuals with traumatic brain injury in Lebanon.","authors":"Marwa Summaka, Hiba Zein, Rama Daoud, Ibrahim Naim, Youssef Fares, Zeina Nasser","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2022.2062671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study is to cross-culturally adapt the Project for the Epidemiological Analysis of Critical Care Patients (PAEEC) Quality of Life (QoL) scale into the Arabic language and to examine its clinimetric properties, including validity and reliability among Lebanese native speaker with traumatic brain injury (TBI). This is a cross-sectional study including 49 men with TBI aged between 20 and 59 years. The Arabic version of the PAEEC (PAEEC-A) was administered to the subjects or their primary caregiver as well as the Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36). The internal consistency, test-retest reliability, content, construct and convergent validity were evaluated. The PAEEC-A displayed high internal consistency (Chronbach's alpha = 0.916) and test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation coefficient = 0.966). Exploratory factor analysis extracted a 3-factor model that explained 68.48% of the total variance. As for the convergent validity, Spearman correlations between the PAEEC-A total score and the physical and mental components of the SF-36 were -0.788 and -0.794, respectively (<i>p</i>-value < 0.0001 for both). The findings indicate that the PAEEC-A has robust clinimetric properties and is a valid and reliable quality of life measure among Lebanese men with traumatic brain injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2022.2062671","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim of this study is to cross-culturally adapt the Project for the Epidemiological Analysis of Critical Care Patients (PAEEC) Quality of Life (QoL) scale into the Arabic language and to examine its clinimetric properties, including validity and reliability among Lebanese native speaker with traumatic brain injury (TBI). This is a cross-sectional study including 49 men with TBI aged between 20 and 59 years. The Arabic version of the PAEEC (PAEEC-A) was administered to the subjects or their primary caregiver as well as the Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36). The internal consistency, test-retest reliability, content, construct and convergent validity were evaluated. The PAEEC-A displayed high internal consistency (Chronbach's alpha = 0.916) and test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation coefficient = 0.966). Exploratory factor analysis extracted a 3-factor model that explained 68.48% of the total variance. As for the convergent validity, Spearman correlations between the PAEEC-A total score and the physical and mental components of the SF-36 were -0.788 and -0.794, respectively (p-value < 0.0001 for both). The findings indicate that the PAEEC-A has robust clinimetric properties and is a valid and reliable quality of life measure among Lebanese men with traumatic brain injury.
期刊介绍:
pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.