Strategic Nonprofit Communication: Effects of Cross-Sector Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Alliances on Nonprofits and the Mediating Role of Social-Objectives Achievement and Consumer Brand Identification
Michail Vafeiadis, V. Harrison, Pratiti Diddi, Frank E. Dardis, C. Buckley
{"title":"Strategic Nonprofit Communication: Effects of Cross-Sector Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Alliances on Nonprofits and the Mediating Role of Social-Objectives Achievement and Consumer Brand Identification","authors":"Michail Vafeiadis, V. Harrison, Pratiti Diddi, Frank E. Dardis, C. Buckley","doi":"10.1080/1553118X.2021.1945610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Strategic communication scholarship has examined the effects of cross-sector corporate social responsibility (CSR) alliances on companies; however, less is known about their impact on nonprofit organizations (NPOs). Drawing on multidisciplinary research, this study investigated how NPO-corporate CSR partnerships influence nonprofits. A 2 (nonprofit reputation: low vs. high) x 2 (CSR fit: low vs. high) x 2 (partnership duration: short vs. long) between-subjects experiment (N = 330) showed that CSR alliances are more effective for high-reputation NPOs. Mediation analyses revealed significant indirect effects on supportive intentions and NPO reputation through the mediator of social-objectives achievement. No significant direct effects were found for partnership fit and duration. Follow-up mediation tests showed that social-objectives achievement led to increased word-of-mouth (WOM) intentions and reputational benefits when a high-reputation NPO allied with a high-fit company. Social-objectives achievement and consumer-brand identification produced positive supportive intentions and reputational benefits when the NPO collaborated with a high-fit business. Regarding duration, when the NPO launched short-term initiatives with high-fit companies, consumers demonstrated less favorable reactions toward the nonprofit if they did not identify with the partnering company. This study advances the strategic communication field by demonstrating that NPO-corporate CSR collaborations are complex and their success depends on underlying mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":39017,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Strategic Communication","volume":"15 1","pages":"275 - 292"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Strategic Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2021.1945610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
ABSTRACT Strategic communication scholarship has examined the effects of cross-sector corporate social responsibility (CSR) alliances on companies; however, less is known about their impact on nonprofit organizations (NPOs). Drawing on multidisciplinary research, this study investigated how NPO-corporate CSR partnerships influence nonprofits. A 2 (nonprofit reputation: low vs. high) x 2 (CSR fit: low vs. high) x 2 (partnership duration: short vs. long) between-subjects experiment (N = 330) showed that CSR alliances are more effective for high-reputation NPOs. Mediation analyses revealed significant indirect effects on supportive intentions and NPO reputation through the mediator of social-objectives achievement. No significant direct effects were found for partnership fit and duration. Follow-up mediation tests showed that social-objectives achievement led to increased word-of-mouth (WOM) intentions and reputational benefits when a high-reputation NPO allied with a high-fit company. Social-objectives achievement and consumer-brand identification produced positive supportive intentions and reputational benefits when the NPO collaborated with a high-fit business. Regarding duration, when the NPO launched short-term initiatives with high-fit companies, consumers demonstrated less favorable reactions toward the nonprofit if they did not identify with the partnering company. This study advances the strategic communication field by demonstrating that NPO-corporate CSR collaborations are complex and their success depends on underlying mechanisms.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Strategic Communication examines the philosophical, theoretical, and applied nature of strategic communication, which is “the purposeful use of communication by an organization to fulfill its mission.” IJSC provides a foundation for the study of strategic communication from diverse disciplines, including corporate and managerial communication, organizational communication, public relations, marketing communication, advertising, political and health communication, social marketing, international relations, public diplomacy, and other specialized communication areas. The IJSC is the singular forum for multidisciplinary inquiry of this nature.