Similarities between Preexplorative Diagnosis and Perexplorative Findings of Intestinal Obstruction Patients in Two Tertiary Care Hospitals in Bangladesh

S. Akter, D. Paul, D. Das
{"title":"Similarities between Preexplorative Diagnosis and Perexplorative Findings of Intestinal Obstruction Patients in Two Tertiary Care Hospitals in Bangladesh","authors":"S. Akter, D. Paul, D. Das","doi":"10.3329/jemc.v9i3.43243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Intestinal obstruction is a common surgical problem that surgeons face in clinical practice. Still intestinal obstruction is a major problem in medical college hospitals in Bangladesh. Causes of intestinal obstruction remain same as earlier. There is lack of statistical data in our country. So, this study will be helpful in various aspect of management of intestinal obstruction patients by providing data. \nObjective: To find out similarities between preoperative diagnosis with actual peroperative findings of intestinal obstruction. \nMaterials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from April 2013 to April 2014 at Enam Medical College Hospital and Dhaka Medical College Hospital. Two hundred patients were selected by purposive sampling of diagnosed cases of intestinal obstruction. \nResults: Among the subjects male were 124 (62%) and female were 76 (38%). Mean age was 34.56 ± 9.13 years. The maximum respondents were from 21–30 years age group (54%) followed by 31–40 years (18%) age group. Chronic intestinal obstruction was present in 53% cases and acute intestinal obstruction in 47% cases. The clinical profile showed that all patients had abdominal pain followed by vomiting (78%). The preoperative diagnosis of intestinal obstruction was neoplastic obstruction (24%) followed by obstructed hernia (22.5%). The highest similarities (100%) were observed in case of volvulus and ileosigmoid knotting. Obstructed hernia had the highest accuracy (97.7%) followed by neoplastic obstruction (91.66%). Maximum patients (13.5%) suffered from wound infection followed by burst abdomen (3%). \nConclusion: The preoperative diagnoses are very much similar to peroperative findings. The clinical parameters and other mandatory diagnostic tools commonly used in tertiary level hospitals in our country showed diagnostic accuracy in diagnosis of intestinal obstruction. \nJ Enam Med Col 2019; 9(3): 155-159","PeriodicalId":30472,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Enam Medical College","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Enam Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jemc.v9i3.43243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intestinal obstruction is a common surgical problem that surgeons face in clinical practice. Still intestinal obstruction is a major problem in medical college hospitals in Bangladesh. Causes of intestinal obstruction remain same as earlier. There is lack of statistical data in our country. So, this study will be helpful in various aspect of management of intestinal obstruction patients by providing data. Objective: To find out similarities between preoperative diagnosis with actual peroperative findings of intestinal obstruction. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from April 2013 to April 2014 at Enam Medical College Hospital and Dhaka Medical College Hospital. Two hundred patients were selected by purposive sampling of diagnosed cases of intestinal obstruction. Results: Among the subjects male were 124 (62%) and female were 76 (38%). Mean age was 34.56 ± 9.13 years. The maximum respondents were from 21–30 years age group (54%) followed by 31–40 years (18%) age group. Chronic intestinal obstruction was present in 53% cases and acute intestinal obstruction in 47% cases. The clinical profile showed that all patients had abdominal pain followed by vomiting (78%). The preoperative diagnosis of intestinal obstruction was neoplastic obstruction (24%) followed by obstructed hernia (22.5%). The highest similarities (100%) were observed in case of volvulus and ileosigmoid knotting. Obstructed hernia had the highest accuracy (97.7%) followed by neoplastic obstruction (91.66%). Maximum patients (13.5%) suffered from wound infection followed by burst abdomen (3%). Conclusion: The preoperative diagnoses are very much similar to peroperative findings. The clinical parameters and other mandatory diagnostic tools commonly used in tertiary level hospitals in our country showed diagnostic accuracy in diagnosis of intestinal obstruction. J Enam Med Col 2019; 9(3): 155-159
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孟加拉国两家三级护理医院对肠梗阻患者的探索性诊断和反复研究结果的相似性
背景:肠梗阻是外科医生在临床实践中面临的常见外科问题。肠梗阻仍然是孟加拉国医学院医院的一个主要问题。肠梗阻的原因与早期相同。我国缺乏统计数据。因此,本研究将为肠梗阻患者管理的各个方面提供数据。目的:了解肠梗阻的术前诊断与术中实际表现的相似性。材料和方法:这项横断面研究于2013年4月至2014年4月在搪瓷医学院医院和达卡医学院医院进行。通过对诊断为肠梗阻的病例进行有目的的抽样,选择了200名患者。结果:受试者中男性124人(62%),女性76人(38%)。平均年龄34.56±9.13岁。最多的受访者来自21至30岁年龄组(54%),其次是31至40岁(18%)年龄组。53%的病例出现慢性肠梗阻,47%的病例出现急性肠梗阻。临床资料显示,所有患者都有腹痛,然后呕吐(78%)。术前对肠梗阻的诊断是肿瘤性梗阻(24%),其次是梗阻性疝(22.5%)。在肠扭转和回鞘样打结的病例中观察到最高的相似性(100%)。梗阻性疝的准确率最高(97.7%),其次是肿瘤性疝(91.66%)。最多的患者(13.5%)是伤口感染,然后是腹部爆裂(3%)。结论:术前诊断与术后发现非常相似。我国三级医院常用的临床参数和其他强制性诊断工具对肠梗阻的诊断具有准确性。搪瓷医学杂志2019;9(3):155-159
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
Unusual Site of Metastasis of Renal Cell Carcinoma Comparative Study of Topical Terbinafine 1% Cream versus Butenafine 1% Cream in the Treatment of Tinea Cruris From the desk of Editor-in-Chief Vol.11(1) College News Vol. 11(1) Outcome of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) Patients in the Intensive Care Unit of Enam Medical College & Hospital During the Period of July 2018 to May 2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1