The Online Interface and Social Inclusion: A MOOC Study in Turkey

IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Interactive Media in Education Pub Date : 2020-05-11 DOI:10.5334/jime.558
Serpil Meri Yilan
{"title":"The Online Interface and Social Inclusion: A MOOC Study in Turkey","authors":"Serpil Meri Yilan","doi":"10.5334/jime.558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the virtues of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) is that, because of their scalability, temporal flexibility and digital mediation, they have the potential to increase learner numbers in higher education, boosting their general level of social inclusion. Whether a MOOC actually succeeds in enhancing students’ social inclusion, however, is shaped by two elements of the course: 1) the features of the online interface – the embedded linguistic, pedagogical and interactive features that direct students’ engagement with the course materials, the educator and their peers; and 2) the knowledge content of the course, especially its relevancy for equipping learners to be able to engage meaningfully with the world after completion of the MOOC. With this in mind, this paper focuses on the first element, exploring Turkish students’ experiences of taking a MOOC and their perceptions of how the MOOC interface shaped their sense of social inclusion. Fifteen university-level students registered for a five-week MOOC on how to improve their English language writing skills. They then completed a questionnaire about their views on the learning experience. Nine of the students also kept diaries reflecting on their learning through the MOOC. Findings reveal that these students had a positive view of the MOOC, with different elements of the online interface playing important roles in improving digital, educational and social inclusion. The paper ends by recommending that researchers should further investigate the relationship between social inclusion and MOOCs; that course designers should rethink the role of online interfaces within MOOCS; and that Turkish higher education institutions should develop more MOOCs with locally relevant features embedded within them.","PeriodicalId":45406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interactive Media in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interactive Media in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

One of the virtues of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) is that, because of their scalability, temporal flexibility and digital mediation, they have the potential to increase learner numbers in higher education, boosting their general level of social inclusion. Whether a MOOC actually succeeds in enhancing students’ social inclusion, however, is shaped by two elements of the course: 1) the features of the online interface – the embedded linguistic, pedagogical and interactive features that direct students’ engagement with the course materials, the educator and their peers; and 2) the knowledge content of the course, especially its relevancy for equipping learners to be able to engage meaningfully with the world after completion of the MOOC. With this in mind, this paper focuses on the first element, exploring Turkish students’ experiences of taking a MOOC and their perceptions of how the MOOC interface shaped their sense of social inclusion. Fifteen university-level students registered for a five-week MOOC on how to improve their English language writing skills. They then completed a questionnaire about their views on the learning experience. Nine of the students also kept diaries reflecting on their learning through the MOOC. Findings reveal that these students had a positive view of the MOOC, with different elements of the online interface playing important roles in improving digital, educational and social inclusion. The paper ends by recommending that researchers should further investigate the relationship between social inclusion and MOOCs; that course designers should rethink the role of online interfaces within MOOCS; and that Turkish higher education institutions should develop more MOOCs with locally relevant features embedded within them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线界面与社会包容:一项在土耳其的MOOC研究
大规模在线开放课程(MOOCs)的优点之一是,由于其可扩展性、时间灵活性和数字中介,它们有可能增加高等教育中的学习者数量,提高他们的总体社会包容水平。然而,MOOC是否真正成功地增强了学生的社会包容性,取决于课程的两个要素:1)在线界面的特征——嵌入式语言、教学和互动特征,这些特征指导学生与课程材料、教育者和他们的同龄人进行互动;2)课程的知识内容,特别是其相关性,使学习者在完成MOOC课程后能够与世界进行有意义的接触。考虑到这一点,本文将重点放在第一个要素上,探讨土耳其学生参加MOOC的经历,以及他们对MOOC界面如何塑造他们的社会包容感的看法。15名大学生报名参加了为期五周的MOOC课程,学习如何提高他们的英语写作技能。然后,他们完成了一份关于他们对学习经历的看法的调查问卷。其中9名学生还写日记,回顾他们在MOOC上的学习。调查结果显示,这些学生对MOOC持积极态度,在线界面的不同元素在提高数字、教育和社会包容性方面发挥了重要作用。文章最后建议研究者应进一步研究社会包容与mooc之间的关系;课程设计者应该重新思考在线界面在mooc中的作用;土耳其高等教育机构应该开发更多具有当地特色的mooc课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Interactive Media in Education
Journal of Interactive Media in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Digital Scholarship from the Periphery: Insights from Researchers in Chile on Academia.edu and ResearchGate Interacting through Blogs in Theatre/Drama Education: A Greek Case Study Factual vs. Fake News: Teachers’ Lens on Critical Media Literacy Education in EFL Classes An Overview of Student Perceptions of Hybrid Flexible Learning at a London HEI Investigating the Views and Use of Stackable Microcredentials within a Postgraduate Certificate in Academic Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1