Nick LaRocca Vs. “Jelly Roll” Morton: Notions of Authorship in the “Tiger Rag” Controversy

Q3 Arts and Humanities Jazz Perspectives Pub Date : 2021-09-02 DOI:10.1080/17494060.2022.2029753
Josiah Boornazian
{"title":"Nick LaRocca Vs. “Jelly Roll” Morton: Notions of Authorship in the “Tiger Rag” Controversy","authors":"Josiah Boornazian","doi":"10.1080/17494060.2022.2029753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Pianist and composer Ferdinand “Jelly Roll” Morton and Original Dixieland Jazz Band cornetist Dominic “Nick” LaRocca epitomize the intersection of some of the most hotly debated topics in jazz historiography and mainstream jazz culture: musical authorship and historical accuracy. The dispute between Morton and LaRocca over the provenance of the classic early jazz composition “Tiger Rag” and the related controversies surrounding claims made by Morton during his Library of Congress interviews with folklorist Alan Lomax are revealing case studies in this regard. While examining the “Tiger Rag” authorship debates, this article discusses evolving and competing notions of authorship in jazz culture and scholarship and seeks to illuminate both the difficulties involved in determining authorial attribution for disputed early jazz compositions and the ways in which traditional single-author paradigms are perhaps less suited to aspects of early jazz practice than distributed and communal authorship.","PeriodicalId":39826,"journal":{"name":"Jazz Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jazz Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17494060.2022.2029753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Pianist and composer Ferdinand “Jelly Roll” Morton and Original Dixieland Jazz Band cornetist Dominic “Nick” LaRocca epitomize the intersection of some of the most hotly debated topics in jazz historiography and mainstream jazz culture: musical authorship and historical accuracy. The dispute between Morton and LaRocca over the provenance of the classic early jazz composition “Tiger Rag” and the related controversies surrounding claims made by Morton during his Library of Congress interviews with folklorist Alan Lomax are revealing case studies in this regard. While examining the “Tiger Rag” authorship debates, this article discusses evolving and competing notions of authorship in jazz culture and scholarship and seeks to illuminate both the difficulties involved in determining authorial attribution for disputed early jazz compositions and the ways in which traditional single-author paradigms are perhaps less suited to aspects of early jazz practice than distributed and communal authorship.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼克·拉罗卡与“果冻卷”莫顿:“虎拉格”争议中的作者概念
钢琴家和作曲家费迪南德·莫顿(Ferdinand“Jelly Roll”Morton)和原迪克西兰爵士乐队(Original Dixieland Jazz Band)的小鼓手多米尼克·拉罗卡(Dominic“Nick”LaRocca)代表了爵士史学和主流爵士文化中一些最激烈争论的话题的交叉点:音乐作者和历史准确性。莫顿和拉罗卡之间关于早期爵士经典作品“Tiger Rag”出处的争论,以及围绕莫顿在国会图书馆与民俗学家艾伦·洛马克斯(Alan Lomax)的访谈中提出的主张的相关争议,都是这方面的案例研究。在研究“虎拉格”作者身份的争论时,本文讨论了爵士文化和学术中作者身份的演变和竞争概念,并试图阐明确定有争议的早期爵士作品的作者归属所涉及的困难,以及传统的单一作者范式可能不太适合早期爵士实践方面的方式,而不是分布式和公共作者身份。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jazz Perspectives
Jazz Perspectives Arts and Humanities-Music
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Shitposting of Jazz to Come: Virtual Communities, Internetworks, and the Dank Jazz Meme Free Improvisation, Egalitarianism, and Knowledge Fusion – Locating Artistic Hybridity in Miles Davis’ “Spanish Key” The Gathering Ground: Composing Collaboration in Nyilipidgi, a Dynamic Meeting of manikay and jazz Uncovering the Origin Story of Juan Tizol’s Caravan: A Predecessor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1