Systematic Observation of Physical Distancing Behaviors of Trail Users During the COVID-19 Pandemic

T. Bias, S. Daily, C. Abildso, Heather Venrick, Elizabeth Shay, Samantha I Moyers, A. Hege, V. Haas, Angela M. Dyer, Robert S. Broce, Richard W. Christiana
{"title":"Systematic Observation of Physical Distancing Behaviors of Trail Users During the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"T. Bias, S. Daily, C. Abildso, Heather Venrick, Elizabeth Shay, Samantha I Moyers, A. Hege, V. Haas, Angela M. Dyer, Robert S. Broce, Richard W. Christiana","doi":"10.51250/jheal.v1i3.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, opportunities for indoor and sometimes outdoor recreation were restricted across the world. Despite restrictions, many greenways and rail-trails saw increased use. Messaging from the federal and state public health authorities stressed the importance of social distancing and other preventive measures in reducing spread of the coronavirus. Little is known about actual behaviors of individuals and groups using these outdoor recreational opportunities. This study used passive infrared cameras to systematically observe physical distancing behaviors on multi-user trails in Boone, North Carolina, and Morgantown, West Virginia, to assess safety implications of trail use during June 2020. Most interactions (72.2%) occurred with the recommended six feet of distance between users. Maintaining six feet of distance is more likely to occur when a single individual passes another single individual (88.2%), users pass while traveling in opposite directions (75.9%), and trails are wider (76.8% on 12 ft width trail vs. 62.6% on a 10 ft width trail). Messaging on multi-user trails should target how groups pass other groups, such as “keep six feet” and “pass single file.”","PeriodicalId":73774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of healthy eating and active living","volume":"1 1","pages":"121 - 127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of healthy eating and active living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51250/jheal.v1i3.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

During the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, opportunities for indoor and sometimes outdoor recreation were restricted across the world. Despite restrictions, many greenways and rail-trails saw increased use. Messaging from the federal and state public health authorities stressed the importance of social distancing and other preventive measures in reducing spread of the coronavirus. Little is known about actual behaviors of individuals and groups using these outdoor recreational opportunities. This study used passive infrared cameras to systematically observe physical distancing behaviors on multi-user trails in Boone, North Carolina, and Morgantown, West Virginia, to assess safety implications of trail use during June 2020. Most interactions (72.2%) occurred with the recommended six feet of distance between users. Maintaining six feet of distance is more likely to occur when a single individual passes another single individual (88.2%), users pass while traveling in opposite directions (75.9%), and trails are wider (76.8% on 12 ft width trail vs. 62.6% on a 10 ft width trail). Messaging on multi-user trails should target how groups pass other groups, such as “keep six feet” and “pass single file.”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎疫情期间步道使用者身体距离行为的系统观察
在COVID-19大流行的最初几个月,世界各地的室内和有时是室外娱乐机会受到限制。尽管有限制,许多绿道和铁路小径的使用量还是增加了。联邦和州公共卫生当局的消息强调了保持社交距离和其他预防措施对减少冠状病毒传播的重要性。人们对个人和团体利用这些户外娱乐机会的实际行为知之甚少。本研究使用被动红外摄像机系统地观察了北卡罗来纳州布恩和西弗吉尼亚州摩根敦多用户步道上的物理距离行为,以评估2020年6月期间步道使用的安全影响。大多数交互(72.2%)发生在用户之间推荐的6英尺距离。当一个人超过另一个人时(88.2%),用户在相反方向行驶时超过(75.9%),以及路径更宽(76.8%在12英尺宽的路径上vs. 62.6%在10英尺宽的路径上),更有可能保持6英尺的距离。多用户路径上的消息传递应该针对小组如何通过其他小组,例如“保持六英尺”和“通过单个队列”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adult Sports Participation and Physical Activity: How About Curling? Black Girls as Transformative Leaders in Physical Activity Programs. Brownfields to Healthfields: A Retrospective Ripple Effect Mapping Evaluation in Three Rural Communities. Complete Highway Removal vs. Highway Removal to Boulevards vs. Caps: Redressing Past Wrongs while Addressing the Decay of America's Most Ambitious Public Works Project. Developing translational products for adapting evidence-based physical activity interventions in rural communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1