The Limitations of Hashtag Feminist Activism on South African Twitter: A Case Study of #MenAreTrash and #WomenAreTrash

IF 3 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Men and Masculinities Pub Date : 2023-07-10 DOI:10.1177/1097184X231188681
P. A. Reneses, T. Bosch
{"title":"The Limitations of Hashtag Feminist Activism on South African Twitter: A Case Study of #MenAreTrash and #WomenAreTrash","authors":"P. A. Reneses, T. Bosch","doi":"10.1177/1097184X231188681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social media has become a central arena for debates around feminism and gender in South Africa. One recent example can be found in the hashtag #MenAreTrash, which has been a trending topic multiple times on South African Twitter. However, despite the prevalence of gender-based violence in the country, these conversations have also come under strong criticism, especially from men. Existing literature on social media expressions of misogyny and anti-feminism has primarily focused on North American and European case studies. This article expands existing literature by analyzing men’s reactions to the #MenAreTrash hashtag and highlighting the role and backlash against feminism in South Africa. Based on a thematic analysis of 600 tweets, this article explores the discursive strategies employed by South African cisgender men on Twitter in response to the #MenAreTrash hashtag. Beyond some marginal yet relevant examples of reflexibility and allyship, the overwhelmingly negative response from men online, as found by the study, reflected a lack of self-reflection about their masculinity. The article provides additional insights into the role of digital feminist activism in shaping networked masculinities in the South African context.","PeriodicalId":47750,"journal":{"name":"Men and Masculinities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Men and Masculinities","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X231188681","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social media has become a central arena for debates around feminism and gender in South Africa. One recent example can be found in the hashtag #MenAreTrash, which has been a trending topic multiple times on South African Twitter. However, despite the prevalence of gender-based violence in the country, these conversations have also come under strong criticism, especially from men. Existing literature on social media expressions of misogyny and anti-feminism has primarily focused on North American and European case studies. This article expands existing literature by analyzing men’s reactions to the #MenAreTrash hashtag and highlighting the role and backlash against feminism in South Africa. Based on a thematic analysis of 600 tweets, this article explores the discursive strategies employed by South African cisgender men on Twitter in response to the #MenAreTrash hashtag. Beyond some marginal yet relevant examples of reflexibility and allyship, the overwhelmingly negative response from men online, as found by the study, reflected a lack of self-reflection about their masculinity. The article provides additional insights into the role of digital feminist activism in shaping networked masculinities in the South African context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非推特上标签女权主义行动的局限性:以“男人是垃圾”和“女人是垃圾”为例
社交媒体已经成为南非围绕女权主义和性别问题展开辩论的中心舞台。最近的一个例子可以在#MenAreTrash标签中找到,该标签多次成为南非推特上的热门话题。然而,尽管该国普遍存在基于性别的暴力,但这些对话也受到了强烈的批评,尤其是来自男性的批评。现有关于社交媒体表达厌女症和反女权主义的文献主要集中在北美和欧洲的案例研究上。本文通过分析男性对#MenAreTrash标签的反应,并强调南非对女权主义的作用和反对,扩展了现有文献。基于对600条推文的主题分析,本文探讨了南非顺性别男性在推特上针对#MenAreTrash标签所采用的话语策略。除了一些边缘但相关的反身性和盟友关系的例子外,研究发现,男性在网上的绝大多数负面反应反映了他们对自己的男子气概缺乏自我反思。这篇文章对数字女权主义激进主义在南非背景下塑造网络男性气质的作用提供了更多的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Men and Masculinities presents peer-reviewed empirical and theoretical scholarship grounded in the most current theoretical perspectives within gender studies, including feminism, queer theory and multiculturalism. Using diverse methodologies, Men and Masculinities"s articles explore the evolving roles and perceptions of men across society. Complementing existing publications on women"s studies and gay and lesbian studies, Men and Masculinities helps complete the spectrum of research on gender. The journal gives scholars interested in gender vital, balanced information on the burgeoning - and often misunderstood - field of masculinities studies.
期刊最新文献
Take the Red Pill, Blame Feminism: Victimization Narratives Across the Manosphere Cut From the Same Cloth? The Problem of Male Supremacy and Deradicalization Unpacking Single Men’s Constructions of Innocent Men and Culpable Women in a #MeToo Context Reintroducing the “Tough Black Man” and Its Socio-Demographic, Race-Related, and Psychological Correlates From Hegemonic to Hybrid and Back? The Context-Adaptive Masculinity of Polish Male Migrants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1