Key Drivers in Using Low Damage Seismic Designs in Christchurch Buildings

Juliet Skidmore, G. Granello, A. Palermo
{"title":"Key Drivers in Using Low Damage Seismic Designs in Christchurch Buildings","authors":"Juliet Skidmore, G. Granello, A. Palermo","doi":"10.5459/bnzsee.55.4.214-228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following the extensive damage to Christchurch’s infrastructure in the 2010 and 2011 Canterbury earthquakes, a complete rebuild of the city centre has been undertaken, with a particular focus on seismic-resilient buildings. This paper explores the application of different seismic-resilient technologies to buildings in Christchurch, by interviewing the structural engineers responsible for the design of six case study structures. Focus is given to the structural performance and benefits of each technology, and the key factors driving the clients’ and engineers’ decision to use the system. Comparisons are then made between resilient technologies, looking at the relative construction times and cost, areas of difficulty in design and construction, and the expected performance. Assessments are made of the knowledgeability of stakeholders, including clients and engineers, in resilient design, and the aspects that need to be addressed in the ongoing research and development of new and existing resilient technologies.\nResults show that the main factors identified driving clients’ and engineers’ decisions to use a seismic-resilient design were the structural performance, ease of construction and publicity. Key issues that need to be addressed during the development of new resilient systems are the durability, constructability and cost of a design, in addition to the production of design and construction aids, to both support engineers and contractors in the process, and encourage them to undertake a seismic-resilient design. Ideas are presented for increasing client and public awareness of different resilient systems available so that the demand and commission for seismic-resilient buildings in the city may increase.","PeriodicalId":46396,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.55.4.214-228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Following the extensive damage to Christchurch’s infrastructure in the 2010 and 2011 Canterbury earthquakes, a complete rebuild of the city centre has been undertaken, with a particular focus on seismic-resilient buildings. This paper explores the application of different seismic-resilient technologies to buildings in Christchurch, by interviewing the structural engineers responsible for the design of six case study structures. Focus is given to the structural performance and benefits of each technology, and the key factors driving the clients’ and engineers’ decision to use the system. Comparisons are then made between resilient technologies, looking at the relative construction times and cost, areas of difficulty in design and construction, and the expected performance. Assessments are made of the knowledgeability of stakeholders, including clients and engineers, in resilient design, and the aspects that need to be addressed in the ongoing research and development of new and existing resilient technologies. Results show that the main factors identified driving clients’ and engineers’ decisions to use a seismic-resilient design were the structural performance, ease of construction and publicity. Key issues that need to be addressed during the development of new resilient systems are the durability, constructability and cost of a design, in addition to the production of design and construction aids, to both support engineers and contractors in the process, and encourage them to undertake a seismic-resilient design. Ideas are presented for increasing client and public awareness of different resilient systems available so that the demand and commission for seismic-resilient buildings in the city may increase.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克赖斯特彻奇建筑使用低损伤抗震设计的关键驱动因素
克赖斯特彻奇的基础设施在2010年和2011年坎特伯雷地震中遭到严重破坏后,已经对市中心进行了全面重建,重点是抗震建筑。本文通过采访负责六个案例研究结构设计的结构工程师,探讨了不同抗震技术在克赖斯特彻奇建筑中的应用。重点介绍了每种技术的结构性能和优点,以及驱动客户和工程师决定使用该系统的关键因素。然后对弹性技术进行比较,考察相对施工时间和成本、设计和施工中的困难区域以及预期性能。评估包括客户和工程师在内的利益相关者在弹性设计方面的知识能力,以及在新技术和现有弹性技术的持续研发中需要解决的方面。结果表明,驱动客户和工程师决定使用抗震设计的主要因素是结构性能、施工方便性和宣传。在开发新的弹性系统过程中需要解决的关键问题是设计的耐久性、可施工性和成本,以及设计和施工辅助工具的生产,以在这一过程中支持工程师和承包商,并鼓励他们进行抗震弹性设计。提出了提高客户和公众对不同弹性系统的认识的想法,以便增加城市对抗震建筑的需求和佣金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
17.60%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Earthquake design loads for retaining walls Infrastructure planning emergency levels of service for the Wellington region, Aotearoa New Zealand – An operationalised framework Seismic fragility of reinforced concrete buildings with hollow-core flooring systems Evaluation of the Inter-frequency Correlation of New Zealand CyberShake Crustal Earthquake Simulations Seismic protection of artefacts with adhesives and base-isolation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1