“Much Worse Than the Plague”

IF 0.4 0 LITERATURE Journal of World Literature Pub Date : 2022-05-18 DOI:10.1163/24056480-00702002
Dustin Lovett
{"title":"“Much Worse Than the Plague”","authors":"Dustin Lovett","doi":"10.1163/24056480-00702002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In Goethe’s Faust, Faust expresses his fear that the alchemical “medicine” he and his father once gave their patients to cure them from plague had done more killing than the plague itself. This fear situates Goethe’s work within a critical discourse stretching back to Pliny the Elder’s Naturalis historia, and carried on from the beginnings of the Faust tradition about magic, medicine and scientific error. From the charges of quackery against the historical Faust, through two centuries of popular literature depicting Faust’s “descent” from theology to medicine as precipitating his embrace of magic, the roots of the Faust legend run through the ambivalent relationship of the magical and medicinal. This article examines how the physician-astrologers of Renaissance Europe informed early Faustian literature, just as the alchemists, whose practices survived well into the Enlightenment, informed not only Goethe’s literary work but the author’s own life. The Faust tradition encodes the cultural salience that medicine has long held in the West as emblematic of the bumpy, dangerous path to knowledge.","PeriodicalId":36587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Literature","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24056480-00702002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Goethe’s Faust, Faust expresses his fear that the alchemical “medicine” he and his father once gave their patients to cure them from plague had done more killing than the plague itself. This fear situates Goethe’s work within a critical discourse stretching back to Pliny the Elder’s Naturalis historia, and carried on from the beginnings of the Faust tradition about magic, medicine and scientific error. From the charges of quackery against the historical Faust, through two centuries of popular literature depicting Faust’s “descent” from theology to medicine as precipitating his embrace of magic, the roots of the Faust legend run through the ambivalent relationship of the magical and medicinal. This article examines how the physician-astrologers of Renaissance Europe informed early Faustian literature, just as the alchemists, whose practices survived well into the Enlightenment, informed not only Goethe’s literary work but the author’s own life. The Faust tradition encodes the cultural salience that medicine has long held in the West as emblematic of the bumpy, dangerous path to knowledge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“比瘟疫更糟糕”
在歌德的《浮士德》中,浮士德表达了他对他和父亲曾经给病人服用的治疗瘟疫的炼金术“药物”比瘟疫本身更致命的恐惧。这种恐惧将歌德的作品置于一种批判话语中,这种批判话语可以追溯到老普林尼的《自然主义史》,并从浮士德关于魔法、医学和科学错误的传统开始延续至今。从对历史上的浮士德的庸医指控,到两个世纪以来将浮士德从神学到医学的“出身”描述为促使他拥抱魔法的通俗文学,浮士德传奇的根源贯穿于魔法和医学之间的矛盾关系。这篇文章探讨了文艺复兴时期欧洲的医生占星家是如何影响早期浮士德文学的,就像炼金术士一样,他们的实践一直延续到启蒙运动,不仅影响了歌德的文学作品,也影响了作者自己的生活。浮士德传统将医学在西方长期以来所具有的文化重要性编码为通往知识的崎岖、危险道路的象征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of World Literature
Journal of World Literature Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
50.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Pearl S. Buck, Her Nobel Prize, and the Nazis Diasporic Papers A World Prize for a World Thinker? The Nobel and Back Again The Indie Nobel?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1