Book Reviews: Designing Parental Leave Policy: The Norway Model and the Changing Face of Fatherhood

IF 3 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Men and Masculinities Pub Date : 2022-12-29 DOI:10.1177/1097184X221148450
Manisha Mathews
{"title":"Book Reviews: Designing Parental Leave Policy: The Norway Model and the Changing Face of Fatherhood","authors":"Manisha Mathews","doi":"10.1177/1097184X221148450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"departure from the traditional breadwinner role of fatherhood to a modern evolution of involved fatherhood. Although we are yet to see such cultural change globally, parental leave has a distinctly high uptake by fathers in Norway (2). The increased participation of fathers in childcare has been attributed to a father’s quota of parental leave that was introduced in Norway, which provided a fifteen-week father-only leave entitlement (7). In Designing Parental Leave Policy, Brandth and Kvande explore the reasons underpinning its success and investigate the extent to which the father’s quota has provided a work-family balance for fathers, supported the development of father-child relationships and contributed towards a marked shift from hegemonic masculinity to caring masculinity. Brandth and Kvande primarily argue that the provision of an individual right to leave for fathers has altered the external and internal perception of fatherhood to include a caring role. The policy design of a father-only leave entitlement has generated the external societal expectation that fathers undertake care work. Additionally, many fathers who were home alone on leave had internally developed greater competency as carers and particularly acquired a need-oriented care practice where they could read their child in order to identify and meet their needs. Relying upon the data obtained from a series of interviews conducted with fathers in the 1980s before the introduction of the father’s quota, in the 1990s after its initial introduction as a 4-week entitlement and in the 2000s after being extended to a 10-week entitlement, Part 1 reveals the importance of the design of the father’s quota in increasing paternal involvement in childcare. Unlike shared parental leave which provided parents with the option to decide between themselves who could take leave in 16 or 26-week periods, fathers encountered a greater sense of entitlement to the father’s quota as the leave scheme was s","PeriodicalId":47750,"journal":{"name":"Men and Masculinities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Men and Masculinities","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X221148450","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

departure from the traditional breadwinner role of fatherhood to a modern evolution of involved fatherhood. Although we are yet to see such cultural change globally, parental leave has a distinctly high uptake by fathers in Norway (2). The increased participation of fathers in childcare has been attributed to a father’s quota of parental leave that was introduced in Norway, which provided a fifteen-week father-only leave entitlement (7). In Designing Parental Leave Policy, Brandth and Kvande explore the reasons underpinning its success and investigate the extent to which the father’s quota has provided a work-family balance for fathers, supported the development of father-child relationships and contributed towards a marked shift from hegemonic masculinity to caring masculinity. Brandth and Kvande primarily argue that the provision of an individual right to leave for fathers has altered the external and internal perception of fatherhood to include a caring role. The policy design of a father-only leave entitlement has generated the external societal expectation that fathers undertake care work. Additionally, many fathers who were home alone on leave had internally developed greater competency as carers and particularly acquired a need-oriented care practice where they could read their child in order to identify and meet their needs. Relying upon the data obtained from a series of interviews conducted with fathers in the 1980s before the introduction of the father’s quota, in the 1990s after its initial introduction as a 4-week entitlement and in the 2000s after being extended to a 10-week entitlement, Part 1 reveals the importance of the design of the father’s quota in increasing paternal involvement in childcare. Unlike shared parental leave which provided parents with the option to decide between themselves who could take leave in 16 or 26-week periods, fathers encountered a greater sense of entitlement to the father’s quota as the leave scheme was s
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书评:设计育儿假政策:挪威模式和父亲身份的变化
从传统的养家糊口的父亲角色到参与父亲的现代演变。尽管我们尚未在全球范围内看到这种文化变化,但挪威父亲对育儿假的接受程度明显很高(2)。父亲参与育儿的增加归因于挪威引入的父亲育儿假配额,该配额提供了15周的父亲专属休假权利(7)。Brandth和Kvande探讨了其成功背后的原因,并调查了父亲的配额在多大程度上为父亲提供了工作与家庭的平衡,支持了父子关系的发展,并促成了从霸道的男性气质到关怀的男性气质的显著转变。Brandth和Kvande主要认为,为父亲提供个人离开的权利已经改变了对父亲的外部和内部看法,包括照顾角色。仅限父亲休假权利的政策设计产生了父亲承担照顾工作的外部社会期望。此外,许多独自在家休假的父亲在内部发展了更强的照顾能力,特别是获得了以需求为导向的照顾实践,他们可以读懂自己的孩子,以识别和满足他们的需求。第一部分通过对父亲进行的一系列访谈获得的数据,这些访谈分别发生在父亲配额引入前的20世纪80年代、最初作为4周权利引入后的20世纪90年代以及延长至10周权利后的21世纪,揭示了父亲配额设计在增加父亲参与育儿方面的重要性。与共同育儿假不同的是,父母可以选择在16周或26周的时间内决定谁可以休假,而父亲则更有权利享受父亲的配额,因为休假计划是5周
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Men and Masculinities presents peer-reviewed empirical and theoretical scholarship grounded in the most current theoretical perspectives within gender studies, including feminism, queer theory and multiculturalism. Using diverse methodologies, Men and Masculinities"s articles explore the evolving roles and perceptions of men across society. Complementing existing publications on women"s studies and gay and lesbian studies, Men and Masculinities helps complete the spectrum of research on gender. The journal gives scholars interested in gender vital, balanced information on the burgeoning - and often misunderstood - field of masculinities studies.
期刊最新文献
Take the Red Pill, Blame Feminism: Victimization Narratives Across the Manosphere Cut From the Same Cloth? The Problem of Male Supremacy and Deradicalization Unpacking Single Men’s Constructions of Innocent Men and Culpable Women in a #MeToo Context Reintroducing the “Tough Black Man” and Its Socio-Demographic, Race-Related, and Psychological Correlates From Hegemonic to Hybrid and Back? The Context-Adaptive Masculinity of Polish Male Migrants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1