Canvas Framework for Performing Systematic Reviews Analysis

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Multidisciplinary Journal for Education Social and Technological Sciences Pub Date : 2018-03-29 DOI:10.4995/MUSE.2018.9832
F. Almeida
{"title":"Canvas Framework for Performing Systematic Reviews Analysis","authors":"F. Almeida","doi":"10.4995/MUSE.2018.9832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The systematic review of the literature is a fundamental methodology for analyzing critically the existing literature on a given research theme. They are designed to be methodical, replicable and guide the author in identifying the main lines of investigation and conclusions in each scientific domain and, in addition, help them in the identification of new directions of research. However, the systematic review process is typically viewed as too heterogeneous, complex and time-consuming. In this sense, it is pertinent to propose a new approach for conducting systematic reviews that may be more agile, not only in terms of development, but also in the analysis of the results of a systematic review process. This article presents a canvas framework for conducting a systematic review composed of nine blocks and based on a set of identified good practices found in the literature, in which it is possible to easily identify all the steps of the process, options taken, and main results.","PeriodicalId":52061,"journal":{"name":"Multidisciplinary Journal for Education Social and Technological Sciences","volume":"5 1","pages":"65-85"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multidisciplinary Journal for Education Social and Technological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4995/MUSE.2018.9832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The systematic review of the literature is a fundamental methodology for analyzing critically the existing literature on a given research theme. They are designed to be methodical, replicable and guide the author in identifying the main lines of investigation and conclusions in each scientific domain and, in addition, help them in the identification of new directions of research. However, the systematic review process is typically viewed as too heterogeneous, complex and time-consuming. In this sense, it is pertinent to propose a new approach for conducting systematic reviews that may be more agile, not only in terms of development, but also in the analysis of the results of a systematic review process. This article presents a canvas framework for conducting a systematic review composed of nine blocks and based on a set of identified good practices found in the literature, in which it is possible to easily identify all the steps of the process, options taken, and main results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
执行系统评审分析的画布框架
对文献的系统回顾是对特定研究主题的现有文献进行批判性分析的基本方法。它们旨在有条不紊、可复制,并指导作者确定每个科学领域的调查主线和结论,此外,还帮助他们确定新的研究方向。然而,系统审查过程通常被认为过于异质、复杂和耗时。从这个意义上说,有必要提出一种新的方法来进行系统审查,这种方法不仅在开发方面,而且在分析系统审查过程的结果方面都可能更加灵活。本文提出了一个画布框架,用于进行系统审查,该框架由九个部分组成,并基于文献中发现的一组已确定的良好做法,在该框架中,可以轻松确定过程的所有步骤、所采取的选项和主要结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
27.30%
发文量
12
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Overview of Second Chance Schools in the Province of Malaga (Spain): A case Study Development and Validation of a Booklet in Educational Research: A Supplementary Material for Filipino Teacher Education Students Role of Higher Education to Adjust the Impulse Eating-Buying Behavior. A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis Analysis of the optimization of resources with Learning Analytics techniques Hackathon in Differentiated English for Specific Purposes Instruction of Information Technology Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1