Delving into psychosocial beliefs about lifelong learning: a comparison across educational levels

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Lifelong Education Pub Date : 2022-11-30 DOI:10.1080/02601370.2022.2150331
Lisse Van Nieuwenhove, Bram De Wever
{"title":"Delving into psychosocial beliefs about lifelong learning: a comparison across educational levels","authors":"Lisse Van Nieuwenhove, Bram De Wever","doi":"10.1080/02601370.2022.2150331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Low-educated adults do not often engage in lifelong learning. The current study examines whether and how psychosocial beliefs about lifelong learning differ between adults with different levels of educational attainment. The Theory of Planned Behaviour, which focuses on three specific psychosocial beliefs (related to Perceived Behavioural Control, Perceived Social Norms, and Attitudes) is used as a theoretical framework. In total, 563 adults completed our survey. ANOVA-analyses were used to study between-groups differences. The results demonstrated that low- and medium-educated adults’ experiences with psychosocial barriers are quite similar, except for power of control, since medium-educated adults experience more control over learning skills needed to participate. High-educated adults experience statistically significant more social pressure to engage in lifelong learning, especially from their work-related referents. In addition, high-educated adults experience statistically significant more control over their participation, specifically when it comes to control over skills necessary to participate in learning. Low-and medium-educated adults do show positive attitudes towards learning, but high-educated adults’ attitudes are statistically significant more positive. Follow-up, qualitative studies could provide in-depth insight into these determinants. Additional understanding of the three psychosocial barriers could help educational institutions and policy makers to appropriately attract and support adult learners.","PeriodicalId":46861,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Lifelong Education","volume":"42 1","pages":"77 - 100"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Lifelong Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2022.2150331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Low-educated adults do not often engage in lifelong learning. The current study examines whether and how psychosocial beliefs about lifelong learning differ between adults with different levels of educational attainment. The Theory of Planned Behaviour, which focuses on three specific psychosocial beliefs (related to Perceived Behavioural Control, Perceived Social Norms, and Attitudes) is used as a theoretical framework. In total, 563 adults completed our survey. ANOVA-analyses were used to study between-groups differences. The results demonstrated that low- and medium-educated adults’ experiences with psychosocial barriers are quite similar, except for power of control, since medium-educated adults experience more control over learning skills needed to participate. High-educated adults experience statistically significant more social pressure to engage in lifelong learning, especially from their work-related referents. In addition, high-educated adults experience statistically significant more control over their participation, specifically when it comes to control over skills necessary to participate in learning. Low-and medium-educated adults do show positive attitudes towards learning, but high-educated adults’ attitudes are statistically significant more positive. Follow-up, qualitative studies could provide in-depth insight into these determinants. Additional understanding of the three psychosocial barriers could help educational institutions and policy makers to appropriately attract and support adult learners.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
深入研究终身学习的心理社会信念:跨教育水平的比较
摘要:受教育程度低的成年人通常不参与终身学习。目前的研究考察了不同教育水平的成年人对终身学习的心理社会信念是否以及如何不同。计划行为理论侧重于三种特定的心理社会信念(与感知的行为控制、感知的社会规范和态度有关),被用作理论框架。总共有563名成年人完成了我们的调查。方差分析用于研究组间差异。研究结果表明,除了控制力之外,低学历和中等学历成年人的心理社会障碍经历非常相似,因为中等学历成年人对参与所需的学习技能有更多的控制力。从统计数据来看,受过高等教育的成年人在终身学习方面承受着更大的社会压力,尤其是来自他们与工作相关的参照。此外,从统计数据来看,受过高等教育的成年人对自己的参与有更大的控制力,特别是在控制参与学习所需的技能方面。低学历和中等学历的成年人确实表现出积极的学习态度,但高学历成年人的态度在统计上更为积极。后续的定性研究可以深入了解这些决定因素。进一步了解这三个心理社会障碍可以帮助教育机构和政策制定者适当吸引和支持成年学习者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Lifelong Education
International Journal of Lifelong Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
27.80%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Lifelong Education provides a forum for debate on the principles and practice of lifelong, adult, continuing, recurrent and initial education and learning, whether in formal, institutional or informal settings. Common themes include social purpose in lifelong education, and sociological, policy and political studies of lifelong education. The journal recognises that research into lifelong learning needs to focus on the relationships between schooling, later learning, active citizenship and personal fulfilment, as well as the relationship between schooling, employability and economic development.
期刊最新文献
Narrative value theory: an educational biography as an iterative theory-of-self Online courses for adults: do they replace or supplement on-site courses? Ideas on how educators facilitate interprofessional learning through controversies The regulatory effect of self-control in the relationship between life satisfaction and lifelong learning motivation in adults Handbook on digital entrepreneurship in adult education for learners, teachers and teacher trainers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1