Business model idea screening: Advancing toward the Bullseye

IF 3.1 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Organizational Dynamics Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2023.100995
George A. Shinkle, Angel Sharma, Patrick Sharry, Jeffrey Tobias, Mélodie Cartel, Dwiardi Vergiawan
{"title":"Business model idea screening: Advancing toward the Bullseye","authors":"George A. Shinkle,&nbsp;Angel Sharma,&nbsp;Patrick Sharry,&nbsp;Jeffrey Tobias,&nbsp;Mélodie Cartel,&nbsp;Dwiardi Vergiawan","doi":"10.1016/j.orgdyn.2023.100995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Business model innovation—designing new business models—is a complex and multifaceted activity. Business model design teams frequently brainstorm long lists of potential ideas and are then left with the challenge of culling the list to a manageable set to pursue further. Drawing from the strategy, business model, entrepreneurship, and innovation literatures, we develop a screening framework that facilitates the practical evaluation of business models. Our approach consolidates and extends the previously mentioned approaches through a careful analysis that results in eleven strategic lenses—which can help managers more robustly assess the strengths and weaknesses of potential business model ideas. We provide specific questions that will aid teams in rating the degree to which each strategic lens is fulfilled by their business model ideas. Further, we present three different process methodologies to match the time investment and analysis robustness desired by specific organizations. Overall, our strategic business model assessment framework, which we call the Bullseye Framework, provides a structure and process for practical and comprehensive business model idea screening.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48061,"journal":{"name":"Organizational Dynamics","volume":"52 3","pages":"Article 100995"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizational Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090261623000396","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Business model innovation—designing new business models—is a complex and multifaceted activity. Business model design teams frequently brainstorm long lists of potential ideas and are then left with the challenge of culling the list to a manageable set to pursue further. Drawing from the strategy, business model, entrepreneurship, and innovation literatures, we develop a screening framework that facilitates the practical evaluation of business models. Our approach consolidates and extends the previously mentioned approaches through a careful analysis that results in eleven strategic lenses—which can help managers more robustly assess the strengths and weaknesses of potential business model ideas. We provide specific questions that will aid teams in rating the degree to which each strategic lens is fulfilled by their business model ideas. Further, we present three different process methodologies to match the time investment and analysis robustness desired by specific organizations. Overall, our strategic business model assessment framework, which we call the Bullseye Framework, provides a structure and process for practical and comprehensive business model idea screening.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
商业模式创意筛选:迈向靶心
商业模式创新——设计新的商业模式——是一项复杂的、多方面的活动。商业模型设计团队经常会集思广益,想出一长串潜在的想法,然后面临着将这些想法筛选成可管理的一组以供进一步研究的挑战。从战略、商业模式、企业家精神和创新文献中,我们开发了一个筛选框架,便于对商业模式进行实际评估。我们的方法通过仔细的分析巩固并扩展了前面提到的方法,得出了11个战略视角,这可以帮助管理者更有力地评估潜在商业模式理念的优缺点。我们会提供一些具体的问题,帮助团队评估每个战略视角在多大程度上被他们的商业模式理念所实现。此外,我们提出了三种不同的过程方法,以匹配特定组织所需的时间投资和分析健壮性。总的来说,我们的战略商业模式评估框架,我们称之为Bullseye框架,为实际和全面的商业模式想法筛选提供了一个结构和过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Organizational Dynamics domain is primarily organizational behavior and development and secondarily, HRM and strategic management. The objective is to link leading-edge thought and research with management practice. Organizational Dynamics publishes articles that embody both theoretical and practical content, showing how research findings can help deal more effectively with the dynamics of organizational life.
期刊最新文献
Trio of human, old and new copilots: Collaborative accountability of human, manuals/standards, and artificial intelligence (AI) Positive mindset: PsyCap’s roles in PERMA+4 and positive organizational psychology, behavior, and scholarship 2.0 Design thinking: Executing your organization's commitment to customer centricity Editorial Board Often wrong, never in doubt: Mitigating leadership overconfidence in decision-making
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1