Teacher Education for Language Assessment and Testing: Postgraduate Program Evaluation from its Students’ Perspective

IF 0.4 Q4 LINGUISTICS Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal Pub Date : 2022-04-22 DOI:10.14483/22487085.17373
Salomi Papadima-Sophocleous
{"title":"Teacher Education for Language Assessment and Testing: Postgraduate Program Evaluation from its Students’ Perspective","authors":"Salomi Papadima-Sophocleous","doi":"10.14483/22487085.17373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A review of research conducted on language assessment teacher education (TE) revealed a lack of studies focused on the participants’ perspective. This work concentrates on the evaluation of an online computer-assisted language assessment and testing (CALAT) TE program offered for four consecutive years. The research was based on a conceptual, multidimensional e-learning evaluation model. The data were obtained from 19 practicing language teachers who attended the MA in Computer-Assisted Language Learning via an online anonymous survey focused on 1) the participants’ engagement; 2) course organization, teaching mode, and materials; 3) course strengths; 4) course aspects most helpful for learning; and 5) course aspects that constituted obstacles for learning. The results indicate the participants’ positive attitude towards the course; they highlighted that their knowledge, skills, and principles had improved, as well as the constructivist instructional design and the organization, teaching modes, and materials of the course, which motivated them and involved them in active interaction and collaboration. The participants also perceived the assessment practices performed during the course in a positive way, which favored their learning and teaching practice within the classroom. The results also include some recommendations for course improvement. ","PeriodicalId":10484,"journal":{"name":"Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14483/22487085.17373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A review of research conducted on language assessment teacher education (TE) revealed a lack of studies focused on the participants’ perspective. This work concentrates on the evaluation of an online computer-assisted language assessment and testing (CALAT) TE program offered for four consecutive years. The research was based on a conceptual, multidimensional e-learning evaluation model. The data were obtained from 19 practicing language teachers who attended the MA in Computer-Assisted Language Learning via an online anonymous survey focused on 1) the participants’ engagement; 2) course organization, teaching mode, and materials; 3) course strengths; 4) course aspects most helpful for learning; and 5) course aspects that constituted obstacles for learning. The results indicate the participants’ positive attitude towards the course; they highlighted that their knowledge, skills, and principles had improved, as well as the constructivist instructional design and the organization, teaching modes, and materials of the course, which motivated them and involved them in active interaction and collaboration. The participants also perceived the assessment practices performed during the course in a positive way, which favored their learning and teaching practice within the classroom. The results also include some recommendations for course improvement. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语言评估与测试的教师教育:学生视角下的研究生课程评估
对语言评估教师教育(TE)研究的回顾显示,缺乏针对参与者观点的研究。这项工作集中于对连续四年提供的在线计算机辅助语言评估和测试(CALAT)TE项目的评估。这项研究基于一个概念性的、多层面的电子学习评估模型。数据来自19名参加计算机辅助语言学习硕士课程的实习语言教师,他们通过一项在线匿名调查获得,重点是1)参与者的参与度;2) 课程组织、教学模式、教材;3) 课程优势;4) 对学习最有帮助的课程方面;以及5)构成学习障碍的课程方面。结果表明,参与者对课程持积极态度;他们强调,他们的知识、技能和原则都有所改善,建构主义的教学设计以及课程的组织、教学模式和材料也有所改善,这激励了他们并使他们参与到积极的互动和协作中。参与者还以积极的方式看待课程中的评估实践,这有利于他们在课堂上的学习和教学实践。研究结果还包括一些课程改进建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Listening to CLIL Practitioners Authentic Materials And Task Design: A Teaching Amalgam English teachers’ perceptions of Task-Based Instruction in Risaralda, Colombia. Teacher-Made Materials Based on Meaningful Learning to Foster Writing Skills. Functional Analysis of Linking Adverbials in Chemistry and English Language Teaching
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1