Welfare as flourishing social reproduction: Polish and Ukrainian migrant workers in a market-participation society

IF 1.5 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Global Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-06-09 DOI:10.1177/14680181231178895
Ania Plomien, Gregory Schwartz
{"title":"Welfare as flourishing social reproduction: Polish and Ukrainian migrant workers in a market-participation society","authors":"Ania Plomien, Gregory Schwartz","doi":"10.1177/14680181231178895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The historical link between labour and welfare is increasingly considered in the transnational register, largely because labour mobilities demand a rethinking of nation-based social protection systems. Transnational labour mobilities also illuminate other dimensions of boundary-crossing, including formality–informality, citizenship–non-citizenship and production–reproduction. These additional considerations call for going beyond the problem of transnational welfare access. We argue that the prism of social reproduction enables such a rethinking of the labour–welfare relationship. In this article, we conceptualise an expanded notion of welfare as flourishing social reproduction, in contradistinction to the principle of welfare deriving primarily from paid work and labour market participation. We apply this theorisation of welfare to our qualitative case study of the experiences and interests of Polish and Ukrainian migrant workers in Germany, Poland and the United Kingdom employed in care provision, food production and housing construction sectors. In the geopolitical setting of uneven and combined Europe, embodying high levels of differentiation together with advanced transnational social protection, we explore the role of differentiation of migrants in labour markets (along work, migration and citizenship axes) and the extent to which transnational mobility facilitates the improvement of social reproduction. While the low-waged labour of Polish and Ukrainian men and women working in care, food and housing furnishes their own and local workers’ social reproduction needs, we find that migrant workers’ welfare as flourishing social reproduction remains wanting, even for those with already privileged access to the current ‘gold-standard’ transnational social protection offered by the EUs freedoms of movement framework. Welfare remains centred on individualised paid work logic, leaving a vast range of needs unmet and work and workers excluded, bearing implications for prevalent transnational social protection efforts.","PeriodicalId":46041,"journal":{"name":"Global Social Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14680181231178895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The historical link between labour and welfare is increasingly considered in the transnational register, largely because labour mobilities demand a rethinking of nation-based social protection systems. Transnational labour mobilities also illuminate other dimensions of boundary-crossing, including formality–informality, citizenship–non-citizenship and production–reproduction. These additional considerations call for going beyond the problem of transnational welfare access. We argue that the prism of social reproduction enables such a rethinking of the labour–welfare relationship. In this article, we conceptualise an expanded notion of welfare as flourishing social reproduction, in contradistinction to the principle of welfare deriving primarily from paid work and labour market participation. We apply this theorisation of welfare to our qualitative case study of the experiences and interests of Polish and Ukrainian migrant workers in Germany, Poland and the United Kingdom employed in care provision, food production and housing construction sectors. In the geopolitical setting of uneven and combined Europe, embodying high levels of differentiation together with advanced transnational social protection, we explore the role of differentiation of migrants in labour markets (along work, migration and citizenship axes) and the extent to which transnational mobility facilitates the improvement of social reproduction. While the low-waged labour of Polish and Ukrainian men and women working in care, food and housing furnishes their own and local workers’ social reproduction needs, we find that migrant workers’ welfare as flourishing social reproduction remains wanting, even for those with already privileged access to the current ‘gold-standard’ transnational social protection offered by the EUs freedoms of movement framework. Welfare remains centred on individualised paid work logic, leaving a vast range of needs unmet and work and workers excluded, bearing implications for prevalent transnational social protection efforts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
福利作为繁荣的社会再生产:市场参与社会中的波兰和乌克兰农民工
劳动力和福利之间的历史联系越来越多地被跨国登记所考虑,这主要是因为劳动力流动需要重新思考基于国家的社会保护制度。跨国劳动力流动也说明了跨界的其他方面,包括形式——非正规性、公民身份——非公民身份和生产——再生产。这些额外的考虑要求超越跨国福利获取问题。我们认为,社会再生产的棱镜使我们能够重新思考劳动-福利关系。在这篇文章中,我们将福利的概念扩展为繁荣的社会再生产,与主要来自有偿工作和劳动力市场参与的福利原则相反。我们将这种福利理论应用于我们对德国、波兰和英国的波兰和乌克兰移民工人在护理、食品生产和住房建设部门的经验和兴趣的定性案例研究。在欧洲不均衡和一体化的地缘政治背景下,体现了高度分化和先进的跨国社会保护,我们探讨了移民在劳动力市场(沿着工作、移民和公民轴线)中的分化作用,以及跨国流动在多大程度上促进了社会再生产的改善。尽管从事护理、食品和住房工作的波兰和乌克兰男女的低薪劳动力满足了他们自己和当地工人的社会再生产需求,但我们发现,移民工人作为繁荣的社会再生产的福利仍然匮乏,即使是那些已经有特权获得欧盟行动自由框架提供的当前“金标准”跨国社会保护的人。福利仍然以个性化的带薪工作逻辑为中心,导致大量需求得不到满足,工作和工人被排除在外,这对普遍的跨国社会保护工作产生了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Social Policy
Global Social Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Global Social Policy is a fully peer-reviewed journal that advances the understanding of the impact of globalisation processes upon social policy and social development on the one hand, and the impact of social policy upon globalisation processes on the other hand. The journal analyses the contributions of a range of national and international actors, both governmental and non-governmental, to global social policy and social development discourse and practice. Global Social Policy publishes scholarly policy-oriented articles and reports that focus on aspects of social policy and social and human development as broadly defined in the context of globalisation be it in contemporary or historical contexts.
期刊最新文献
Blurring ‘social justice’ with ‘market justice’ in recent experiments with healthcare and social protection in the Global South The commodification of poverty in the Global South: The emergence of a social policy market (São Paulo, Brazil) Global Social Policy Digest 24.2: Recalibrating investment at the global level Contradictions at work: Navigating relational autonomy and caste in Delhi, India Divisions among the poor: A survey experiment of tax preferences in liberalizing Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1