Who Governs the Promotion of Social Objectives in EU’s Trade Policies?

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 Q3 ECONOMICS Journal of World Trade Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.54648/trad2022012
Rodrigo Fagundes Cezar
{"title":"Who Governs the Promotion of Social Objectives in EU’s Trade Policies?","authors":"Rodrigo Fagundes Cezar","doi":"10.54648/trad2022012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Who decides about the promotion of social objectives in EU’s trade policies? The existing literature oscillates between giving emphasis to the EU Commission or to interest group lobbying. Both approaches have limitations. To overcome those limitations, I here revisit the EU history of promoting labour provisions at the bi – and multilateral trade levels between 1993 and 2016. I argue that the EU Commission acts in line with the political positions and preferences of EU constituents on trade-labour linkage and that its autonomy depends on how polarized and salient those positions are. After finding evidence in line with that argument, I conclude that EU principals are ultimately in control of the link between trade and social objectives in EU trade policy and that the autonomy of the Commission, although existent, is limited. This article applies nuance to arguments centred on the power of the Commission to promote its own preferences at the expense of its constituents’. In doing so, it also contributes to understanding the politics of the design of social and sustainable development provisions in EU trade agreements.\nTrade Agreements. Labour. Social Issues. Principal-Agent Relations. Historical Narratives. European Union. EU Commission. Autonomy. Decision-making. Sanctions","PeriodicalId":46019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Trade","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World Trade","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2022012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Who decides about the promotion of social objectives in EU’s trade policies? The existing literature oscillates between giving emphasis to the EU Commission or to interest group lobbying. Both approaches have limitations. To overcome those limitations, I here revisit the EU history of promoting labour provisions at the bi – and multilateral trade levels between 1993 and 2016. I argue that the EU Commission acts in line with the political positions and preferences of EU constituents on trade-labour linkage and that its autonomy depends on how polarized and salient those positions are. After finding evidence in line with that argument, I conclude that EU principals are ultimately in control of the link between trade and social objectives in EU trade policy and that the autonomy of the Commission, although existent, is limited. This article applies nuance to arguments centred on the power of the Commission to promote its own preferences at the expense of its constituents’. In doing so, it also contributes to understanding the politics of the design of social and sustainable development provisions in EU trade agreements. Trade Agreements. Labour. Social Issues. Principal-Agent Relations. Historical Narratives. European Union. EU Commission. Autonomy. Decision-making. Sanctions
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁在欧盟贸易政策中管理促进社会目标?
谁决定在欧盟贸易政策中促进社会目标?现有文献在强调欧盟委员会或利益集团游说之间摇摆不定。这两种方法都有局限性。为了克服这些限制,我在这里回顾了1993年至2016年间欧盟在双边和多边贸易层面促进劳工条款的历史。我认为,欧盟委员会的行动符合欧盟成员国在贸易与劳工联系方面的政治立场和偏好,其自主权取决于这些立场的两极分化程度和突出程度。在找到与这一论点一致的证据后,我得出结论,欧盟负责人最终控制着欧盟贸易政策中贸易与社会目标之间的联系,委员会的自主权虽然存在,但有限。本条对以委员会以牺牲其选民利益为代价促进其自身偏好的权力为中心的论点适用了细微差别。这样做也有助于理解欧盟贸易协定中社会和可持续发展条款设计的政治性。贸易协定。劳动社会问题。委托代理关系。历史叙述。欧盟。欧盟委员会。自治决策。制裁
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Far and away the most thought-provoking and informative journal in its field, the Journal of World Trade sets the agenda for both scholarship and policy initiatives in this most critical area of international relations. It is the only journal which deals authoritatively with the most crucial issues affecting world trade today.
期刊最新文献
Rethinking Test Data Protection in China-US Trade War: Integrating Empirical and Normative Analysis The WTO and Using Digital Economy Technologies: Surviving the Race With Preferential Trade Agreements A Tale of Too Little: Anti-dumping Tariff Between SAFTA Contracting Parties Game Analysis of Different Source Disclosure Model for Genetic Resources and Implications for China Improving Export Credit Agency Impact Through Full Faith and Credit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1