Pore Formation by Amphipathic Peptides in Closed Membranes

O. V. Kondrashov, P. I. Kuzmin, S. A. Akimov
{"title":"Pore Formation by Amphipathic Peptides in Closed Membranes","authors":"O. V. Kondrashov,&nbsp;P. I. Kuzmin,&nbsp;S. A. Akimov","doi":"10.1134/S1990747822050075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Various amphipathic antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) kill bacteria by forming through pores in plasma membranes. Previously, at least two alternative types of hypotheses about the mechanisms of AMP membrane poration were put forward. The so-called “non-local” models suggest that AMPs, when interacting with a membrane, modify its integral elastic characteristics, in particular, lateral tension, which leads to a decrease in the deformation energy during pore formation. In this case, AMP molecules can be located far from the formed pore. In “local” models, it is assumed that pores are formed in the immediate vicinity of single AMP molecules or their aggregates, while the peptides partially or completely line the edge of the pore. In both types of models, it is assumed that the process of pore formation passes via an intermediate structure, the so-called hydrophobic defect. In this work, we calculated the energy of formation of the hydrophobic defect in the membrane with adsorbed AMP molecules under the assumption of the non-local poration mechanism. It was found that AMPs actually lower the energy of the hydrophobic defect. However, this decrease in energy is insufficient to explain the experimentally observed average waiting time for membrane poration. Thus, it can be concluded that amphipathic peptides form pores in membranes predominantly by the local mechanism, directly participating in the formation of the pore edge, although nonlocal effects of AMP–membrane interaction somewhat facilitate poration of the membrane as a whole.</p>","PeriodicalId":484,"journal":{"name":"Biochemistry (Moscow), Supplement Series A: Membrane and Cell Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemistry (Moscow), Supplement Series A: Membrane and Cell Biology","FirstCategoryId":"2","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1990747822050075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Various amphipathic antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) kill bacteria by forming through pores in plasma membranes. Previously, at least two alternative types of hypotheses about the mechanisms of AMP membrane poration were put forward. The so-called “non-local” models suggest that AMPs, when interacting with a membrane, modify its integral elastic characteristics, in particular, lateral tension, which leads to a decrease in the deformation energy during pore formation. In this case, AMP molecules can be located far from the formed pore. In “local” models, it is assumed that pores are formed in the immediate vicinity of single AMP molecules or their aggregates, while the peptides partially or completely line the edge of the pore. In both types of models, it is assumed that the process of pore formation passes via an intermediate structure, the so-called hydrophobic defect. In this work, we calculated the energy of formation of the hydrophobic defect in the membrane with adsorbed AMP molecules under the assumption of the non-local poration mechanism. It was found that AMPs actually lower the energy of the hydrophobic defect. However, this decrease in energy is insufficient to explain the experimentally observed average waiting time for membrane poration. Thus, it can be concluded that amphipathic peptides form pores in membranes predominantly by the local mechanism, directly participating in the formation of the pore edge, although nonlocal effects of AMP–membrane interaction somewhat facilitate poration of the membrane as a whole.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
封闭膜中两性肽的孔隙形成
各种两性抗菌肽(AMPs)通过在质膜上形成的孔杀死细菌。在此之前,至少有两种关于AMP膜穿孔机制的假设被提出。所谓的“非局部”模型表明,当amp与膜相互作用时,会改变其整体弹性特性,特别是侧向张力,从而导致孔隙形成过程中的变形能降低。在这种情况下,AMP分子可以位于远离形成孔的地方。在“局部”模型中,假设孔隙是在单个AMP分子或其聚集体的附近形成的,而多肽部分或完全排列在孔隙边缘。在这两种类型的模型中,假设孔隙形成过程通过一个中间结构,即所谓的疏水缺陷。在这项工作中,我们计算了在非局部穿孔机制的假设下,吸附AMP分子在膜上形成疏水缺陷的能量。发现amp实际上降低了疏水缺陷的能量。然而,这种能量的减少不足以解释实验观察到的膜穿孔的平均等待时间。因此,可以得出结论,两性肽在膜上形成孔主要是通过局部机制,直接参与孔边缘的形成,尽管amp -膜相互作用的非局部效应在一定程度上促进了整个膜的穿孔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Biochemistry (Moscow), Supplement Series A: Membrane and Cell Biology   is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes original articles on physical, chemical, and molecular mechanisms that underlie basic properties of biological membranes and mediate membrane-related cellular functions. The primary topics of the journal are membrane structure, mechanisms of membrane transport, bioenergetics and photobiology, intracellular signaling as well as membrane aspects of cell biology, immunology, and medicine. The journal is multidisciplinary and gives preference to those articles that employ a variety of experimental approaches, basically in biophysics but also in biochemistry, cytology, and molecular biology. The journal publishes articles that strive for unveiling membrane and cellular functions through innovative theoretical models and computer simulations.
期刊最新文献
The Rhodopsin Project To the 90th Anniversary of the Birth of Academician Yuri Anatolievich Ovchinnikov Alterations of Store-Operated Calcium Entry in Neurodegenerative Pathologies: History, Facts, and Prospects Structural Studies of Ion Channels: Achievements, Problems, and Perspectives Structure and Functions of the OTOP1 Proton Channel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1