Educational Technology Research Patterns in the Realm of the Digital Knowledge Age

IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Interactive Media in Education Pub Date : 2020-09-17 DOI:10.5334/JIME.570
Aras Bozkurt
{"title":"Educational Technology Research Patterns in the Realm of the Digital Knowledge Age","authors":"Aras Bozkurt","doi":"10.5334/JIME.570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Educational technology (EdTech) is a dynamic, evolving field and as such, in identifying and mapping research patterns in this field, a systematic approach is required. Starting from when the World Wide Web became publicly available, this study conducts a systematic review of educational technology research patterns. The review showed that after 1993, there was a sudden increase in the number of educational technology publications, and that in terms of subject areas, social sciences dominate the field, which suggests that there is a need for more interdisciplinary research. Regarding the geographical distribution of the research, the review found that most of the contributions come from the same developed countries. The following themes from over the course of almost three decades were identified: 1993–1999 multimedia learning and instructional design; 2000–2004 convergence of educational technology, distance education and online learning environments, and educational technology integration in traditional learning settings; 2005–2009 revising curriculum for educational technology, educational technology in higher education and distance education, and the bottleneck of the significant differences in educational technology research; 2010–2014 online learning and higher education, integration of ICT and full potential of educational technology; and 2015–2019 data-driven, smart educational technology, big data, and learning analytics. While critical views are increasing, this study also observed that some discourse, such as arguments that EdTech will change education and replace teachers, are constantly articulated throughout the literature.","PeriodicalId":45406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interactive Media in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interactive Media in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/JIME.570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

Educational technology (EdTech) is a dynamic, evolving field and as such, in identifying and mapping research patterns in this field, a systematic approach is required. Starting from when the World Wide Web became publicly available, this study conducts a systematic review of educational technology research patterns. The review showed that after 1993, there was a sudden increase in the number of educational technology publications, and that in terms of subject areas, social sciences dominate the field, which suggests that there is a need for more interdisciplinary research. Regarding the geographical distribution of the research, the review found that most of the contributions come from the same developed countries. The following themes from over the course of almost three decades were identified: 1993–1999 multimedia learning and instructional design; 2000–2004 convergence of educational technology, distance education and online learning environments, and educational technology integration in traditional learning settings; 2005–2009 revising curriculum for educational technology, educational technology in higher education and distance education, and the bottleneck of the significant differences in educational technology research; 2010–2014 online learning and higher education, integration of ICT and full potential of educational technology; and 2015–2019 data-driven, smart educational technology, big data, and learning analytics. While critical views are increasing, this study also observed that some discourse, such as arguments that EdTech will change education and replace teachers, are constantly articulated throughout the literature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字知识时代教育技术研究模式
教育技术是一个动态的、不断发展的领域,因此,在识别和绘制该领域的研究模式时,需要一种系统的方法。从万维网公开开始,本研究对教育技术研究模式进行了系统的回顾。审查显示,1993年之后,教育技术出版物的数量突然增加,就学科领域而言,社会科学在该领域占主导地位,这表明需要更多的跨学科研究。关于研究的地理分布,审查发现,大多数贡献来自同一发达国家。确定了近三十年来的以下主题:1993-1999年多媒体学习和教学设计;2000-2004年教育技术、远程教育和在线学习环境的融合,以及传统学习环境中的教育技术整合;2005-2009年修订教育技术、高等教育教育技术和远程教育课程,教育技术研究存在显著差异的瓶颈;2010-2014年在线学习和高等教育、信息和通信技术的整合以及教育技术的全部潜力;以及2015-2019年数据驱动、智能教育技术、大数据和学习分析。在批评观点不断增加的同时,本研究还观察到,一些话语,例如EdTech将改变教育和取代教师的论点,在整个文献中不断得到阐述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Interactive Media in Education
Journal of Interactive Media in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Interacting through Blogs in Theatre/Drama Education: A Greek Case Study Factual vs. Fake News: Teachers’ Lens on Critical Media Literacy Education in EFL Classes An Overview of Student Perceptions of Hybrid Flexible Learning at a London HEI Investigating the Views and Use of Stackable Microcredentials within a Postgraduate Certificate in Academic Practice Using Skills Profiling to Enable Badges and Micro-Credentials to be Incorporated into Higher Education Courses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1