Emergent Stories Written by Children while Coding: How do these Emerge and Are they Valid Compositions?

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Writing Research Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI:10.17239/jowr-2019.11.02.02
C. Price, Ruth Price-Mohr
{"title":"Emergent Stories Written by Children while Coding: How do these Emerge and Are they Valid Compositions?","authors":"C. Price, Ruth Price-Mohr","doi":"10.17239/jowr-2019.11.02.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper extends our research into a novel Story-Writing-Coding engine, where Primary School children produce animated stories through writing computer code. We first discuss the theoretical basis of our engine design, drawing on Systemic Functional Grammar, embodied cognition and perceived animacy. This design aims to help children draw on the appearances of characters, props and scenery to evoke linguistic constructs leading to the emergence of stories. The second part of this paper reports on an empirical study where we aim to answer two research questions. First can compositions so produced be seen as valid compositions? To answer this question we conducted a linguistic analysis of coded stories and those written in an English classroom, and also using teacher ratings of these stories. Results indicate that while there are no significant linguistic differences between coded and English stories, coded stories are impoverished and should be seen as a first-draft to be revised in the English classroom. The second question was to probe our observation that while coding, children spontaneously told stories. Here we draw upon theories of embodied cognition and of perceived animacy. Our analysis suggests that these theories, taken together, help to explain the spontaneous emergence of stories.","PeriodicalId":45632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Writing Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Writing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2019.11.02.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper extends our research into a novel Story-Writing-Coding engine, where Primary School children produce animated stories through writing computer code. We first discuss the theoretical basis of our engine design, drawing on Systemic Functional Grammar, embodied cognition and perceived animacy. This design aims to help children draw on the appearances of characters, props and scenery to evoke linguistic constructs leading to the emergence of stories. The second part of this paper reports on an empirical study where we aim to answer two research questions. First can compositions so produced be seen as valid compositions? To answer this question we conducted a linguistic analysis of coded stories and those written in an English classroom, and also using teacher ratings of these stories. Results indicate that while there are no significant linguistic differences between coded and English stories, coded stories are impoverished and should be seen as a first-draft to be revised in the English classroom. The second question was to probe our observation that while coding, children spontaneously told stories. Here we draw upon theories of embodied cognition and of perceived animacy. Our analysis suggests that these theories, taken together, help to explain the spontaneous emergence of stories.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童在编程时写的突发故事:这些故事是如何产生的,它们是有效的作品吗?
本文将我们的研究扩展到一个新颖的故事写作编码引擎,小学生通过编写计算机代码来制作动画故事。我们首先利用系统功能语法、具体认知和感知动物性来讨论我们的引擎设计的理论基础。这个设计旨在帮助孩子们利用人物、道具和风景的外表来唤起导致故事出现的语言结构。本文的第二部分报告了一项实证研究,旨在回答两个研究问题。首先,这样制作的作品可以被视为有效的作品吗?为了回答这个问题,我们对编码故事和在英语课堂上写的故事进行了语言学分析,并使用了教师对这些故事的评分。结果表明,虽然编码故事和英语故事之间没有显著的语言差异,但编码故事是贫乏的,应该被视为在英语课堂上修改的初稿。第二个问题是探究我们的观察结果,即在编码时,孩子们会自发地讲故事。在这里,我们借鉴了具体认知和感知动物性的理论。我们的分析表明,这些理论结合在一起,有助于解释故事的自发出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Writing Research
Journal of Writing Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.90%
发文量
16
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Writing Research is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes high quality theoretical, empirical, and review papers covering the broad spectrum of writing research. The Journal primarily publishes papers that describe scientific studies of the processes by which writing is produced or the means by which writing can be effectively taught. The journal is inherently cross-disciplinary, publishing original research in the different domains of writing research. The Journal of Writing Research is an open access journal (no reader fee - no author fee).
期刊最新文献
Book review | Technology in second language writing: Advances in composing, translation, writing pedagogy and data-driven learning Fleshing out your text: How elaboration and contextualization moves differentially predict writing quality Thinking outside the box: Senior scientists’ metacognitive strategy knowledge and self-regulation of writing for science communication Synthesis Writing in Science Orientation Classes: An Instructional Design Studio Advancing Civics-specific Disciplinary Writing in the Elementary Grades issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1