Populist parties shifting the political discourse? A case study of the Economic Freedom Fighters in South Africa

IF 1.3 4区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES Journal of Modern African Studies Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1017/S0022278X21000276
Marine Fölscher, Nicola de Jager, R. Nyenhuis
{"title":"Populist parties shifting the political discourse? A case study of the Economic Freedom Fighters in South Africa","authors":"Marine Fölscher, Nicola de Jager, R. Nyenhuis","doi":"10.1017/S0022278X21000276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines the use of populist discourse in South African politics. We investigate speeches of leaders from the ruling African National Congress (ANC) and opposition parties, the Democratic Alliance (DA) and the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF). We find that the EFF consistently employs populist appeals, while both the incumbent ANC and official opposition DA largely refrain. Our longitudinal analysis allows an examination of fluctuation across party leaders and electoral cycles, and illustrates that neither the ANC nor the DA have modified their political discourses in light of a rising populist challenger. However, there is some evidence that the two most dominant parties have reformed their programmatic offerings and behaviour in an attempt to compete with the EFF's popular appeal. The South African case offers important insights into the study of oppositional populism on the African continent, and a window into how major political parties may respond to emerging populist contenders.","PeriodicalId":47608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern African Studies","volume":"59 1","pages":"535 - 558"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern African Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022278X21000276","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article examines the use of populist discourse in South African politics. We investigate speeches of leaders from the ruling African National Congress (ANC) and opposition parties, the Democratic Alliance (DA) and the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF). We find that the EFF consistently employs populist appeals, while both the incumbent ANC and official opposition DA largely refrain. Our longitudinal analysis allows an examination of fluctuation across party leaders and electoral cycles, and illustrates that neither the ANC nor the DA have modified their political discourses in light of a rising populist challenger. However, there is some evidence that the two most dominant parties have reformed their programmatic offerings and behaviour in an attempt to compete with the EFF's popular appeal. The South African case offers important insights into the study of oppositional populism on the African continent, and a window into how major political parties may respond to emerging populist contenders.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
民粹主义政党改变政治话语?南非经济自由斗士案例研究
本文探讨了民粹主义话语在南非政治中的使用。我们调查了执政党非洲人国民大会(ANC)和反对党、民主联盟(DA)和经济自由战士(EFF)领导人的演讲。我们发现EFF一贯采用民粹主义的呼吁,而现任的非国大和官方反对党民主联盟党在很大程度上都没有这样做。我们的纵向分析允许对政党领导人和选举周期的波动进行检查,并说明非国大和民主联盟党都没有根据民粹主义挑战者的崛起修改他们的政治话语。然而,有一些证据表明,两个最主要的政党已经改革了他们的纲领和行为,试图与EFF的大众吸引力竞争。南非的案例为研究非洲大陆的反对民粹主义提供了重要的见解,并为了解主要政党如何应对新兴的民粹主义竞争者提供了一个窗口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Modern African Studies offers a quarterly survey of developments in modern African politics and society. Its main emphasis is on current issues in African politics, economies, societies and international relations. It is intended not only for students and academic specialists, but also for general readers and practitioners with a concern for modern Africa, living and working both inside and outside the continent. Editorial policy avoids commitment to any political viewpoint or ideology, but aims at a fair examination of controversial issues in order to promote a deeper understanding of what is happening in Africa today. The journal also includes an invaluable book review section.
期刊最新文献
Externalising migration control in Niger: the humanitarian–security nexus and the International Organization for Migration (IOM) Judge, landlord, broker, watchman: assessing variation in chiefly duties and authority in the Ghana–Togo Borderlands Political trust and informal traders in African cities Somalia's evolving political market place: from famine and humanitarian crisis to permanent precarity Political party ideology in Zambia: comparing the PF and the UPND on social welfare policies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1