A Novel Flight Dynamics Modeling Using Robust Support Vector Regression against Adversarial Attacks

IF 0.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE SAE International Journal of Aerospace Pub Date : 2023-03-24 DOI:10.4271/01-16-03-0019
S. Hashemi, R. Botez
{"title":"A Novel Flight Dynamics Modeling Using Robust Support Vector\n Regression against Adversarial Attacks","authors":"S. Hashemi, R. Botez","doi":"10.4271/01-16-03-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An accurate Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Flight Dynamics Model (FDM) allows us to\n design its efficient controller in early development phases and to increase\n safety while reducing costs. Flight tests are normally conducted for a\n pre-established number of flight conditions, and then mathematical methods are\n used to obtain the FDM for the entire flight envelope. For our UAS-S4 Ehecatl,\n 216 local FDMs corresponding to different flight conditions were utilized to\n create its Local Linear Scheduled Flight Dynamics Model (LLS-FDM). The initial\n flight envelope data containing 216 local FDMs was further augmented using\n interpolation and extrapolation methodologies, thus increasing the number of\n trimmed local FDMs of up to 3,642. Relying on this augmented dataset, the\n Support Vector Machine (SVM) methodology was used as a benchmarking regression\n algorithm due to its excellent performance when training samples could not be\n separated linearly. The trained Support Vector Regression (SVR) predicted the\n FDM for the entire flight envelope. Although the SVR-FDM showed excellent\n performance, it remained vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Hence, we modified\n it using an adversarial retraining defense algorithm by transforming it into a\n Robust SVR-FDM. For validation studies, the quality of predicted UAS-S4 FDM was\n evaluated based on the Root Locus diagram. The closeness of predicted\n eigenvalues to the original eigenvalues confirmed the high accuracy of the\n UAS-S4 SVR-FDM. The SVR prediction accuracy was evaluated at 216 flight\n conditions, for different numbers of neighbors, and a variety of kernel\n functions were also considered. In addition, the regression performance was\n analyzed based on the step response of state variables in the closed-loop\n control architecture. The SVR-FDM provided the shortest rise time and settling\n time, but it failed when adversarial attacks were imposed on the SVR. The\n Robust-SVR-FDM step response properties showed that it could provide more\n accurate results than the LLS-FDM approach while protecting the controller from\n adversarial attacks.","PeriodicalId":44558,"journal":{"name":"SAE International Journal of Aerospace","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAE International Journal of Aerospace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/01-16-03-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

An accurate Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Flight Dynamics Model (FDM) allows us to design its efficient controller in early development phases and to increase safety while reducing costs. Flight tests are normally conducted for a pre-established number of flight conditions, and then mathematical methods are used to obtain the FDM for the entire flight envelope. For our UAS-S4 Ehecatl, 216 local FDMs corresponding to different flight conditions were utilized to create its Local Linear Scheduled Flight Dynamics Model (LLS-FDM). The initial flight envelope data containing 216 local FDMs was further augmented using interpolation and extrapolation methodologies, thus increasing the number of trimmed local FDMs of up to 3,642. Relying on this augmented dataset, the Support Vector Machine (SVM) methodology was used as a benchmarking regression algorithm due to its excellent performance when training samples could not be separated linearly. The trained Support Vector Regression (SVR) predicted the FDM for the entire flight envelope. Although the SVR-FDM showed excellent performance, it remained vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Hence, we modified it using an adversarial retraining defense algorithm by transforming it into a Robust SVR-FDM. For validation studies, the quality of predicted UAS-S4 FDM was evaluated based on the Root Locus diagram. The closeness of predicted eigenvalues to the original eigenvalues confirmed the high accuracy of the UAS-S4 SVR-FDM. The SVR prediction accuracy was evaluated at 216 flight conditions, for different numbers of neighbors, and a variety of kernel functions were also considered. In addition, the regression performance was analyzed based on the step response of state variables in the closed-loop control architecture. The SVR-FDM provided the shortest rise time and settling time, but it failed when adversarial attacks were imposed on the SVR. The Robust-SVR-FDM step response properties showed that it could provide more accurate results than the LLS-FDM approach while protecting the controller from adversarial attacks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种新的对抗性攻击的鲁棒支持向量回归飞行动力学建模方法
精确的无人机飞行动力学模型(FDM)使我们能够在早期开发阶段设计其高效的控制器,并在降低成本的同时提高安全性。飞行测试通常针对预先确定的许多飞行条件进行,然后使用数学方法来获得整个飞行包线的FDM。对于我们的UAS-S4 Ehecatl,使用了216个对应于不同飞行条件的本地FDM来创建其本地线性计划飞行动力学模型(LLS-FDM)。使用插值和外插方法进一步增强了包含216个局部FDM的初始飞行包线数据,从而将修剪后的局部FDM数量增加到3642个。基于这个增强的数据集,支持向量机(SVM)方法被用作基准回归算法,因为它在训练样本不能线性分离时具有优异的性能。经过训练的支持向量回归(SVR)预测了整个飞行包线的FDM。尽管SVR-FDM表现出了出色的性能,但它仍然容易受到对抗性攻击。因此,我们使用对抗性再训练防御算法对其进行了修改,将其转换为鲁棒SVR-FDM。对于验证研究,基于根轨迹图评估预测的UAS-S4 FDM的质量。预测的特征值与原始特征值的接近性证实了UAS-S4 SVR-FDM的高精度。在216种飞行条件下,针对不同数量的邻居,评估了SVR预测精度,并考虑了各种核函数。此外,基于闭环控制结构中状态变量的阶跃响应,分析了回归性能。SVR-FDM提供了最短的上升时间和稳定时间,但当对SVR施加对抗性攻击时,它失败了。鲁棒SVR-FDM阶跃响应特性表明,它可以提供比LLS-FDM方法更准确的结果,同时保护控制器免受对抗性攻击。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SAE International Journal of Aerospace
SAE International Journal of Aerospace ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Computational Investigation of a Flexible Airframe Taxiing Over an Uneven Runway for Aircraft Vibration Testing Material Recognition Technology of Internal Loose Particles in Sealed Electronic Components Based on Random Forest External Synchronization of Distributed Redundant Flight Control Computers Reviewers Determination of the Heat-Controlled Accumulator Volume for the Two-Phase Thermal Control Systems of Spacecraft
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1