The transnational historiography of a dynastic transition: Writing the Ming-Qing transition in seventeenth-century China, Korea, and Japan

IF 1 2区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES Modern Asian Studies Pub Date : 2023-01-25 DOI:10.1017/S0026749X22000245
Chui–Joe Tham
{"title":"The transnational historiography of a dynastic transition: Writing the Ming-Qing transition in seventeenth-century China, Korea, and Japan","authors":"Chui–Joe Tham","doi":"10.1017/S0026749X22000245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Ming-Qing transition (1618–1683), a dynastic upheaval that not only consumed much of China, but also saw the Qing invasion of Joseon Korea and an influx of refugees into Tokugawa Japan, was a source of inspiration for writers across East Asia. Unofficial, contemporary histories written by Ming and early Qing subjects made their way by land and sea to Korea and Japan, where they were either adapted for domestic audiences or used as the basis for new unofficial histories of the dynastic transition. This article makes the argument that unofficial, contemporary history-writing about the Ming-Qing transition in China, Korea, and Japan was part of a regional trend towards an intellectual culture of contemporaneity. While scholars have focused on the transition and its impact upon notions of cultural centrality, it should be emphasized that these notions emerged alongside developments encouraging the production and circulation of contemporary, cross-cultural knowledge and information. In other words, the flourishing of print, diversification of reading audiences, and evolution of new modes of knowledge-production and transmission formed a background against which demand increased for updated information about a shared world. Participation as producers (writers and editors) and consumers (readers) in this seventeenth-century culture of contemporaneity was restricted by language, schooling, and economic standing. Nonetheless, a transnational history perspective will show that the unofficial, multi-vocal, and multilingual historiography of the Ming-Qing transition encourages a re-evaluation of not only the intellectual history of East Asia, but also the history of the transition.","PeriodicalId":51574,"journal":{"name":"Modern Asian Studies","volume":"57 1","pages":"776 - 807"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Asian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X22000245","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The Ming-Qing transition (1618–1683), a dynastic upheaval that not only consumed much of China, but also saw the Qing invasion of Joseon Korea and an influx of refugees into Tokugawa Japan, was a source of inspiration for writers across East Asia. Unofficial, contemporary histories written by Ming and early Qing subjects made their way by land and sea to Korea and Japan, where they were either adapted for domestic audiences or used as the basis for new unofficial histories of the dynastic transition. This article makes the argument that unofficial, contemporary history-writing about the Ming-Qing transition in China, Korea, and Japan was part of a regional trend towards an intellectual culture of contemporaneity. While scholars have focused on the transition and its impact upon notions of cultural centrality, it should be emphasized that these notions emerged alongside developments encouraging the production and circulation of contemporary, cross-cultural knowledge and information. In other words, the flourishing of print, diversification of reading audiences, and evolution of new modes of knowledge-production and transmission formed a background against which demand increased for updated information about a shared world. Participation as producers (writers and editors) and consumers (readers) in this seventeenth-century culture of contemporaneity was restricted by language, schooling, and economic standing. Nonetheless, a transnational history perspective will show that the unofficial, multi-vocal, and multilingual historiography of the Ming-Qing transition encourages a re-evaluation of not only the intellectual history of East Asia, but also the history of the transition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
王朝变迁的跨国史学:书写17世纪中国、朝鲜和日本的明清变迁
摘要明清之交(1618-1683)是东亚作家的灵感来源,这场王朝剧变不仅吞噬了中国的大部分地区,还见证了清朝入侵朝鲜和难民涌入德川日本。明代和清初的非官方当代史通过陆路和海路传播到朝鲜和日本,在那里它们要么被改编为国内观众,要么被用作王朝过渡时期新的非官方历史的基础。本文认为,关于中国、韩国和日本明清转型的非官方当代史写作是走向当代知识文化的区域趋势的一部分。虽然学者们关注这一转变及其对文化中心观念的影响,但应该强调的是,这些观念是在鼓励当代跨文化知识和信息的生产和传播的同时产生的。换言之,印刷品的繁荣、阅读受众的多样化以及知识生产和传播新模式的演变,形成了对共享世界最新信息需求增加的背景。作为生产者(作家和编辑)和消费者(读者)参与17世纪的当代文化受到语言、学校教育和经济地位的限制。尽管如此,从跨国历史的角度来看,明清过渡时期的非官方、多语言和多语言史学不仅鼓励重新评估东亚的知识史,也鼓励重新评估过渡时期的历史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Modern Asian Studies
Modern Asian Studies AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Modern Asian Studies promotes original, innovative and rigorous research on the history, sociology, economics and culture of modern Asia. Covering South Asia, South-East Asia, China, Japan and Korea, the journal is published in six parts each year. It welcomes articles which deploy inter-disciplinary and comparative research methods. Modern Asian Studies specialises in the publication of longer monographic essays based on path-breaking new research; it also carries substantial synoptic essays which illuminate the state of the broad field in fresh ways. It contains a book review section which offers detailed analysis of important new publications in the field.
期刊最新文献
A Song of Fallen Flowers: Miyazaki Tōten and the making of naniwabushi as a mode of popular dissent in transwar Japan, 1902–1909 Effect of Rhinoplasty on Various Angles of Nose on Ideal Position and Alignment in Indian Population. Justifying the use of excessive force: A critical discourse analysis of Chinese police individual WeChat Subscription Accounts ASS volume 57 issue 6 Cover and Back matter ASS volume 57 issue 6 Cover and Front matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1