Self-reported Vital Sign Assessment Practices of Neurologic Physical Therapists

J. O'Brien, H. Wallmann, Jaclynne Karaffa, Marissa Kleilein, Katherine R. Prewitt, H. Schreiber, Hannah Zimmerman
{"title":"Self-reported Vital Sign Assessment Practices of Neurologic Physical Therapists","authors":"J. O'Brien, H. Wallmann, Jaclynne Karaffa, Marissa Kleilein, Katherine R. Prewitt, H. Schreiber, Hannah Zimmerman","doi":"10.1097/CPT.0000000000000206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study's purpose was to describe the vital sign assessment (VSA) practices of physical therapists (PTs) during evaluation and treatment of patients with neurologic conditions. Methods: A survey was distributed to clinicians from a clinical site database and the Academy of Neurologic Physical Therapy's list serve. Respondents included US licensed PTs who treat patients with neurologic conditions. Results: Usable surveys included 133 US PTs with 69.2% doctorally prepared and 79.7% American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) members. Although 58.6% of survey respondents indicated that VSA is an essential part of the PT evaluation, at evaluation, only 37.6% and 39.1% of respondents always take heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP), and only 8.3% of respondents always take respiratory rate (RR). During treatment, only 14.3% of respondents report taking HR or BP at each session, while only 5.3% always take RR. Board certification was correlated with an increased frequency of HR assessment (P = .0027) and BP (P = 0.038) at evaluation, while importance of VSA strongly correlated with increased assessment of HR (P = 0.000), BP (P = 0.000), and RR (P = 0.003) at evaluation and with HR (P = 0.000) and BP (0.000) during treatment. Conclusions: Although VSA by neurologic PTs is higher than other identified PT groups, it is still below-recommended assessment guidelines.","PeriodicalId":72526,"journal":{"name":"Cardiopulmonary physical therapy journal","volume":"34 1","pages":"30 - 38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiopulmonary physical therapy journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CPT.0000000000000206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: This study's purpose was to describe the vital sign assessment (VSA) practices of physical therapists (PTs) during evaluation and treatment of patients with neurologic conditions. Methods: A survey was distributed to clinicians from a clinical site database and the Academy of Neurologic Physical Therapy's list serve. Respondents included US licensed PTs who treat patients with neurologic conditions. Results: Usable surveys included 133 US PTs with 69.2% doctorally prepared and 79.7% American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) members. Although 58.6% of survey respondents indicated that VSA is an essential part of the PT evaluation, at evaluation, only 37.6% and 39.1% of respondents always take heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP), and only 8.3% of respondents always take respiratory rate (RR). During treatment, only 14.3% of respondents report taking HR or BP at each session, while only 5.3% always take RR. Board certification was correlated with an increased frequency of HR assessment (P = .0027) and BP (P = 0.038) at evaluation, while importance of VSA strongly correlated with increased assessment of HR (P = 0.000), BP (P = 0.000), and RR (P = 0.003) at evaluation and with HR (P = 0.000) and BP (0.000) during treatment. Conclusions: Although VSA by neurologic PTs is higher than other identified PT groups, it is still below-recommended assessment guidelines.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经物理治疗师自我报告生命体征评估实践
目的:本研究旨在描述物理治疗师(PT)在评估和治疗神经系统疾病患者期间的生命体征评估(VSA)实践。方法:从临床站点数据库和神经物理治疗学会的列表服务中向临床医生分发一份调查。受访者包括治疗神经系统疾病患者的美国许可PT。结果:可用的调查包括133名美国PT,其中69.2%是医生准备的,79.7%是美国物理治疗协会(APTA)成员。尽管58.6%的受访者表示VSA是PT评估的重要组成部分,但在评估时,只有37.6%和39.1%的受访者总是测量心率(HR)和血压(BP),只有8.3%的受访者总是测呼吸频率(RR)。在治疗期间,只有14.3%的受访者报告每次服用HR或BP,而只有5.3%的人总是服用RR。董事会认证与评估时HR评估(P=0.0027)和BP(P=0.038)频率的增加相关,而VSA的重要性与评估时的HR(P=0.000)、BP(P=0.0000)和RR(P=0.003)评估增加以及治疗期间的HR(P=0.000)和血压(0.000)强相关。结论:尽管神经PT的VSA高于其他已确定的PT组,但仍低于推荐的评估指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Associations between Physical Activity, Systemic Inflammation, and Hospital Admissions in Adults with Heart Failure. From the Swimming Pool to Precision Cardiovascular Physical Therapy: What a Journey! Commentary on “Diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis in Outpatients With Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Survey of Orthopedic and Sports Academies” Professional Community Simulation-Based Cardiopulmonary Examination Skills Checklist: Assessment of Inter-rater Reliability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1