Pandangan Hukum Islam Terhadap Intoleransi Salafi Wahabi

Endang Madali
{"title":"Pandangan Hukum Islam Terhadap Intoleransi Salafi Wahabi","authors":"Endang Madali","doi":"10.51825/NHK.V3I2.9107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Salafism-Wahhabism is intolerance in the problem of khilāfīyah . In ideological issues they are completely intolerant, and in some cases of of worship are tolerant.  This research supports some of the statements from the work of Natana J. Delong-Bas through his book titled “Wahhabi Islam: From Revival and Reform to Global Jihad” (2004), Abdullahi Ahmed an-Naʻim in “Islam and Secular State: Negotiating the Future of Sharia” (2008), and Mazen Hashem through his writings titled “Contemporary Islamic Activism: The Shades of Praxis”, Sociology of Religion (2006). These scholars generally stated that Wahhabism was a radical Madhhab or doctrine or movement because it always persuades the followers to maintain the ‘pure teachings of Islam’, which believed by the proponents applicable to all Muslims. In addition, the Wahhabis have a view of puritanical Islam, which is to be intolerant in a variety of differences, so as to impose uniformity of religious understanding in Indonesia. Therefore, there is no one among them who said that the Salafi Wahabi is a moderate school of though.","PeriodicalId":52601,"journal":{"name":"Nurani Hukum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurani Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51825/NHK.V3I2.9107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Salafism-Wahhabism is intolerance in the problem of khilāfīyah . In ideological issues they are completely intolerant, and in some cases of of worship are tolerant.  This research supports some of the statements from the work of Natana J. Delong-Bas through his book titled “Wahhabi Islam: From Revival and Reform to Global Jihad” (2004), Abdullahi Ahmed an-Naʻim in “Islam and Secular State: Negotiating the Future of Sharia” (2008), and Mazen Hashem through his writings titled “Contemporary Islamic Activism: The Shades of Praxis”, Sociology of Religion (2006). These scholars generally stated that Wahhabism was a radical Madhhab or doctrine or movement because it always persuades the followers to maintain the ‘pure teachings of Islam’, which believed by the proponents applicable to all Muslims. In addition, the Wahhabis have a view of puritanical Islam, which is to be intolerant in a variety of differences, so as to impose uniformity of religious understanding in Indonesia. Therefore, there is no one among them who said that the Salafi Wahabi is a moderate school of though.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反对Wahabi Salafi不容忍的伊斯兰法律观
萨拉菲主义-瓦哈比主义在khilāfīyah问题上是不宽容的。在意识形态问题上,他们是完全不宽容的,在崇拜的某些情况下,他们是宽容的。这项研究支持了Natana J. Delong-Bas的著作《瓦哈比伊斯兰:从复兴和改革到全球圣战》(2004年)、Abdullahi Ahmed an-Na haim的著作《伊斯兰与世俗国家:伊斯兰教法的未来谈判》(2008年)和Mazen Hashem的著作《当代伊斯兰激进主义:实践的阴影》(2006年)中的一些观点。这些学者普遍认为瓦哈比主义是一种激进的Madhhab或教义或运动,因为它总是说服追随者维护“伊斯兰教的纯粹教义”,支持者认为这适用于所有穆斯林。此外,瓦哈比人对清教徒式的伊斯兰教有一种看法,即不能容忍各种差异,从而在印度尼西亚强加统一的宗教理解。因此,他们当中没有人说萨拉菲派瓦哈比是一个温和的思想流派。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Bridges, Not Walls: The Role of Migration and International Human Rights Law in Harnessing the Impending Demographic Tsunami Navigating Legal Boundaries: Academic Freedom and Content Restrictions in Turkish Publication Religious Anthropology: Catalyst for Unravelling Discourses and Fostering Profound Understanding in Arab Society through Islamic Law Digital Financial Strategy: New Direction or the Usual Old? Different Gender Priorities Amid EU Labor Laws and Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1