{"title":"The Sin of the Angels in 2 Peter 2:4 and Jude 6","authors":"Kim Papaioannou","doi":"10.1353/jbl.2021.0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The angelic sin of 2 Pet 2:4 and Jude 6 is thought to reflect the Watcher myth of the Book of the Watchers on the grounds of the popularity of the myth in early Judaism and the literary relationship between 1 En. 1:9 and Jude 14–15. A critical reexamination of the evidence, however, suggests contrasting approaches to the myth and a variety of traditions in the Enoch literature undermining both of the above assumptions. The nature of the angelic sin of 2 Pet 2:4 and Jude 6 can best be confirmed on contextual grounds. In this respect, the intentional parallel between examples of punishment and the sins of the false teachers in both 2 Peter and Jude identifies the angelic sin in question as blasphemy—an aspiration to the position of God—in agreement with a long tradition of angelic blasphemy in Jewish and early Christian exposition.","PeriodicalId":15251,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biblical Literature","volume":"140 1","pages":"391 - 408"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/jbl.2021.0019","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biblical Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jbl.2021.0019","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract:The angelic sin of 2 Pet 2:4 and Jude 6 is thought to reflect the Watcher myth of the Book of the Watchers on the grounds of the popularity of the myth in early Judaism and the literary relationship between 1 En. 1:9 and Jude 14–15. A critical reexamination of the evidence, however, suggests contrasting approaches to the myth and a variety of traditions in the Enoch literature undermining both of the above assumptions. The nature of the angelic sin of 2 Pet 2:4 and Jude 6 can best be confirmed on contextual grounds. In this respect, the intentional parallel between examples of punishment and the sins of the false teachers in both 2 Peter and Jude identifies the angelic sin in question as blasphemy—an aspiration to the position of God—in agreement with a long tradition of angelic blasphemy in Jewish and early Christian exposition.