Evaluation of Safety from the Perspective of Patients Hospitalized in Medical and Surgical Wards

M. Ehsani, Mansoureh Ashghali Farahani, S. Haghani, F. Marandi
{"title":"Evaluation of Safety from the Perspective of Patients Hospitalized in Medical and Surgical Wards","authors":"M. Ehsani, Mansoureh Ashghali Farahani, S. Haghani, F. Marandi","doi":"10.32598/jhnm.33.3.2484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Patient feedback on safety-related factors provides valuable preventative information to manage safety and improve hospital care quality. Objective: This study aims to determine the perspective of hospitalized patients toward safety. These patients were admitted to the medical and surgical wards in two hospitals in Tehran, Iran. Materials and Methods: This research is a descriptive-analytical study. A total of 290 patients hospitalized in the medical and surgical wards of two hospitals in Tehran were recruited between April and November 2020. They were selected using a stratified sampling method with proportional allocation. Participants were requested to evaluate and report the safety factors using the patient measure of safety questionnaire. The obtained data were analyzed using the independent t-test, variance analysis, and Pearson correlation coefficient. Results: Fifty-three percent of the participants in this study were male, with a mean age of 50.75±17.36 years. Approximately one-fourth of the patients had cancer, with 35.1% suffering for 1 to 6 months. The patients’ most and least favorite perspectives mean scores were toward dignity and respect (3.80±1.07) and access to resources (3.31±0.66), respectively. Moreover, patients’ views on safety were related to their disease type (P=0.021).","PeriodicalId":36020,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/jhnm.33.3.2484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patient feedback on safety-related factors provides valuable preventative information to manage safety and improve hospital care quality. Objective: This study aims to determine the perspective of hospitalized patients toward safety. These patients were admitted to the medical and surgical wards in two hospitals in Tehran, Iran. Materials and Methods: This research is a descriptive-analytical study. A total of 290 patients hospitalized in the medical and surgical wards of two hospitals in Tehran were recruited between April and November 2020. They were selected using a stratified sampling method with proportional allocation. Participants were requested to evaluate and report the safety factors using the patient measure of safety questionnaire. The obtained data were analyzed using the independent t-test, variance analysis, and Pearson correlation coefficient. Results: Fifty-three percent of the participants in this study were male, with a mean age of 50.75±17.36 years. Approximately one-fourth of the patients had cancer, with 35.1% suffering for 1 to 6 months. The patients’ most and least favorite perspectives mean scores were toward dignity and respect (3.80±1.07) and access to resources (3.31±0.66), respectively. Moreover, patients’ views on safety were related to their disease type (P=0.021).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内科和外科病房住院患者的安全性评价
患者对安全相关因素的反馈提供了有价值的预防信息,以管理安全并提高医院护理质量。目的:本研究旨在了解住院病人对安全的看法。这些病人住进伊朗德黑兰两家医院的内科和外科病房。材料与方法:本研究为描述性分析研究。2020年4月至11月期间,在德黑兰两家医院的内科和外科病房共招募了290名住院患者。采用分层抽样的方法,按比例分配。参与者被要求评估和报告安全因素,使用患者安全量表。所得资料采用独立t检验、方差分析和Pearson相关系数进行分析。结果:53%的受试者为男性,平均年龄50.75±17.36岁。大约四分之一的患者患有癌症,35.1%的患者患有1至6个月的癌症。患者最喜欢和最不喜欢的观点平均得分分别为尊严和尊重(3.80±1.07)和资源获取(3.31±0.66)。此外,患者对安全性的看法与疾病类型相关(P=0.021)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery
Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and Risk Factors of Third-and Fourth-degree Perineal Tears During Vaginal Delivery Among Women in Qom, Iran The Effect of Modulating Environmental Stimuli on Pain Experience in Premature Infants During Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter-port Implantation Effect of Existential Group Therapy on Infertility Stress in Infertile Men’s Spouses Factors Affecting the Intention of Healthcare Providers in Responding to Disasters: A Systematic Literature Review Relationship Between Personality Traits and Health Anxiety Among Nurses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1