Ethical and social aspects of neural prosthetics

IF 5 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) Pub Date : 2021-10-26 DOI:10.1088/2516-1091/ac23e6
W. Glannon
{"title":"Ethical and social aspects of neural prosthetics","authors":"W. Glannon","doi":"10.1088/2516-1091/ac23e6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neural prosthetics are devices or systems that bypass, modulate, supplement, or replace regions of the brain and its connections to the body that are damaged and dysfunctional from congenital abnormalities, brain and spinal cord injuries, limb loss, and neuropsychiatric disorders. Some prosthetics are implanted in the brain. Others consist of implants and systems outside the brain to which they are connected. Still others are completely external to the brain. But they all send inputs to and receive outputs from neural networks to modulate or improve connections between the brain and body. As artificial systems, neural prosthetics can improve but not completely restore natural sensory, motor and cognitive functions. This review examines the main ethical and social issues generated by experimental and therapeutic uses of seven types of neural prosthetics: auditory and visual prosthetics for deafness and blindness; deep brain stimulation for prolonged disorders of consciousness; brain-computer and brain-to-brain interfaces to restore movement and communication; memory prosthetics to encode and retrieve information; and optogenetics to modulate or restore neural function. The review analyzes and discusses how recipients of neural prosthetics can benefit from them in restoring autonomous agency, how they can be harmed by trying and failing to use or adapt to them, how these systems affect their identities, how to protect people with prosthetics from external interference, and how to ensure fair access to them. The review concludes by emphasizing the control these systems provide for people and a brief exploration of the future of neural prosthetics.","PeriodicalId":74582,"journal":{"name":"Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2516-1091/ac23e6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Neural prosthetics are devices or systems that bypass, modulate, supplement, or replace regions of the brain and its connections to the body that are damaged and dysfunctional from congenital abnormalities, brain and spinal cord injuries, limb loss, and neuropsychiatric disorders. Some prosthetics are implanted in the brain. Others consist of implants and systems outside the brain to which they are connected. Still others are completely external to the brain. But they all send inputs to and receive outputs from neural networks to modulate or improve connections between the brain and body. As artificial systems, neural prosthetics can improve but not completely restore natural sensory, motor and cognitive functions. This review examines the main ethical and social issues generated by experimental and therapeutic uses of seven types of neural prosthetics: auditory and visual prosthetics for deafness and blindness; deep brain stimulation for prolonged disorders of consciousness; brain-computer and brain-to-brain interfaces to restore movement and communication; memory prosthetics to encode and retrieve information; and optogenetics to modulate or restore neural function. The review analyzes and discusses how recipients of neural prosthetics can benefit from them in restoring autonomous agency, how they can be harmed by trying and failing to use or adapt to them, how these systems affect their identities, how to protect people with prosthetics from external interference, and how to ensure fair access to them. The review concludes by emphasizing the control these systems provide for people and a brief exploration of the future of neural prosthetics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经修复术的伦理和社会方面
神经修复术是一种绕过、调节、补充或替代大脑及其与身体连接的区域的装置或系统,这些区域因先天性异常、脑和脊髓损伤、肢体丧失和神经精神障碍而受损和功能失调。一些假肢被植入大脑。其他包括植入物和大脑外的系统,它们与之相连。还有一些完全在大脑之外。但它们都向神经网络发送输入并从神经网络接收输出,以调节或改善大脑和身体之间的连接。作为人工系统,神经假肢可以改善但不能完全恢复自然的感觉、运动和认知功能。这篇综述审查了七种神经假肢的实验和治疗用途所产生的主要伦理和社会问题:耳聋和失明的听觉和视觉假肢;脑深部刺激治疗长期意识障碍;脑-计算机和脑-脑接口,以恢复运动和通信;记忆修复术,用于编码和检索信息;以及调节或恢复神经功能的光遗传学。该综述分析和讨论了神经假肢的接受者如何在恢复自主能动性方面从中受益,他们如何因尝试和不使用或适应神经假肢而受到伤害,这些系统如何影响他们的身份,如何保护使用假肢的人免受外部干扰,以及如何确保公平使用假肢。综述最后强调了这些系统为人们提供的控制,并对神经修复术的未来进行了简要探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lifetime engineering of bioelectronic implants with mechanically reliable thin film encapsulations The stochastic digital human is now enrolling for in silico imaging trials – Methods and tools for generating digital cohorts Updates on polyurethane and its multifunctional applications in biomedical engineering Wearable facial electromyography: in the face of new opportunities A systematic review of cardiac in-silico clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1