ISLAMIC REVIVAL IN KAZAKHSTAN: STATE POLICY

Q3 Social Sciences Central Asia and the Caucasus Pub Date : 2021-09-27 DOI:10.37178/ca-c.21.3.014
Ruslan M. Sarsembayev, N. Aitymbetov, S. Tleubayev, Zh.E. Aldiyarova
{"title":"ISLAMIC REVIVAL IN KAZAKHSTAN: STATE POLICY","authors":"Ruslan M. Sarsembayev, N. Aitymbetov, S. Tleubayev, Zh.E. Aldiyarova","doi":"10.37178/ca-c.21.3.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is widely known that Islamic revival is behind numerous national security threats, religious tension and political challenges. This is confirmed by the fact that practically all terrorist acts are committed by extremist and terrorist groups, which reproduce and execute specific projects of Islamic revival, the Islamic Caliphate being one of the pertinent examples. Fully aware of the threats rooted in the radical and extremist ideas of Islamic revival, the state has no choice but an active and determined opposition. In the 2005-2020, Kazakhstan adopted several normative legal program documents and took certain organizational measures to improve the regulation of the religious situation in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Many of these laws and organizational measures, however, stirred up heated discussions: the opposition insisted that the state should secularize the society, securitize Islam, etc. Much has been said about the efficiency of opposition to radical and extremist models of Islamic revival. Together, this creates a varied and even contradictory background for the state policy related to Islamic revival and calls for closer attention to the situation unfolding among the Muslims of Kazakhstan. We are already in the third decade of the 21st century, an important stage at which the religious and political environment created by Islamic revival and the relations between the state and confessions should be assessed. In this article, we analyze the state policy in the context of Islamic revival and offer its conceptual analysis as a multifaceted phenomenon. A modernist trend, which often prevails, is developing along with the fundamentalist trend within the framework of the Islamic revival. Accordingly, the authors argue that state policy is not directed against the Islamic revival as such and does not aim for the securitization of Islam or the secularization of society; on the contrary, it seeks to preserve the historically formed recontextualized Islam, which is rooted in the fundamentals of Islam and is simultaneously consistent with modernization and national heritage. In the concluding part of the article the authors touch upon a scholarly discussion of whether state policy of opposing the extremist Islamic revival models is efficient and to which extent. Our discussion and conclusions are supported by sociological data on the religious situation in the Muslim community, obtained through comparison of the religiosity level and the extent of people’s respect for the country’s authorities.","PeriodicalId":53489,"journal":{"name":"Central Asia and the Caucasus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central Asia and the Caucasus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37178/ca-c.21.3.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is widely known that Islamic revival is behind numerous national security threats, religious tension and political challenges. This is confirmed by the fact that practically all terrorist acts are committed by extremist and terrorist groups, which reproduce and execute specific projects of Islamic revival, the Islamic Caliphate being one of the pertinent examples. Fully aware of the threats rooted in the radical and extremist ideas of Islamic revival, the state has no choice but an active and determined opposition. In the 2005-2020, Kazakhstan adopted several normative legal program documents and took certain organizational measures to improve the regulation of the religious situation in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Many of these laws and organizational measures, however, stirred up heated discussions: the opposition insisted that the state should secularize the society, securitize Islam, etc. Much has been said about the efficiency of opposition to radical and extremist models of Islamic revival. Together, this creates a varied and even contradictory background for the state policy related to Islamic revival and calls for closer attention to the situation unfolding among the Muslims of Kazakhstan. We are already in the third decade of the 21st century, an important stage at which the religious and political environment created by Islamic revival and the relations between the state and confessions should be assessed. In this article, we analyze the state policy in the context of Islamic revival and offer its conceptual analysis as a multifaceted phenomenon. A modernist trend, which often prevails, is developing along with the fundamentalist trend within the framework of the Islamic revival. Accordingly, the authors argue that state policy is not directed against the Islamic revival as such and does not aim for the securitization of Islam or the secularization of society; on the contrary, it seeks to preserve the historically formed recontextualized Islam, which is rooted in the fundamentals of Islam and is simultaneously consistent with modernization and national heritage. In the concluding part of the article the authors touch upon a scholarly discussion of whether state policy of opposing the extremist Islamic revival models is efficient and to which extent. Our discussion and conclusions are supported by sociological data on the religious situation in the Muslim community, obtained through comparison of the religiosity level and the extent of people’s respect for the country’s authorities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哈萨克斯坦的伊斯兰复兴:国家政策
众所周知,伊斯兰复兴是许多国家安全威胁、宗教紧张和政治挑战的背后原因。事实证明,几乎所有恐怖主义行为都是极端主义和恐怖主义集团所为,他们复制和执行伊斯兰复兴的具体项目,伊斯兰哈里发就是一个有关的例子。充分意识到伊斯兰复兴的激进和极端思想所带来的威胁,国家别无选择,只能积极坚决地反对。2005-2020年,哈萨克斯坦通过了若干规范性的法律规划文件,并采取了一定的组织措施,完善了对哈萨克斯坦共和国宗教状况的管理。然而,这些法律和组织措施中的许多都激起了激烈的讨论:反对派坚持认为国家应该将社会世俗化,将伊斯兰教证券化等等。关于反对伊斯兰复兴的激进和极端主义模式的有效性,人们已经说了很多。总之,这为有关伊斯兰复兴的国家政策创造了一个不同的、甚至是相互矛盾的背景,并要求更密切地关注哈萨克斯坦穆斯林中正在发生的局势。我们已经进入21世纪的第三个十年,这是一个重要的阶段,应该评估伊斯兰复兴所创造的宗教和政治环境以及国家与教派之间的关系。在本文中,我们分析了伊斯兰复兴背景下的国家政策,并将其作为一个多方面的现象进行了概念分析。在伊斯兰复兴的框架内,经常盛行的现代主义趋势与原教旨主义趋势一起发展。因此,作者认为,国家政策并不针对伊斯兰复兴本身,也不以伊斯兰教的证券化或社会的世俗化为目的;相反,它寻求保存历史上形成的重新背景化的伊斯兰教,这种伊斯兰教植根于伊斯兰教的基本原则,同时符合现代化和民族传统。在文章的最后部分,作者对反对伊斯兰极端主义复兴模式的国家政策是否有效以及在何种程度上有效进行了学术讨论。我们的讨论和结论得到了关于穆斯林社区宗教状况的社会学数据的支持,这些数据是通过比较宗教虔诚程度和人们对国家当局的尊重程度获得的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Central Asia and the Caucasus
Central Asia and the Caucasus Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Pakistan's Trade Opportunities and Challenges with CARs: Metaphor Used by the US as a Lethal Weapon of Mass Destruction against the Other for Pursuing Ulterior Motives Prohibition on Opium Poppy Cultivation in Afghanistan: Geo-Politics of Afghanistan under Taliban Regime: Pakistan and Central Asian Republics: Cooperation and Opportunities -Trade and Energy corridors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1