Foreign experience of legal regulation of illegal influence on the results of official sports competitions

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW Justicia Pub Date : 2022-06-30 DOI:10.17081/just.27.41.5362
Yevhen Leheza, I. Yefimova, V. Harkusha, N. Cherniak, N. Holenko
{"title":"Foreign experience of legal regulation of illegal influence on the results of official sports competitions","authors":"Yevhen Leheza, I. Yefimova, V. Harkusha, N. Cherniak, N. Holenko","doi":"10.17081/just.27.41.5362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the research is devoted to the criminological description and explanation of the state of illegal influence on the results of official sports competitions in Ukraine. Main  content. An ultra-high level of latency of crimes according to  Art. 369-3 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine is found, which is at least 99% of their actual level. The structure of match-fixing was revealed and analyzed depending on the type of sport, the method of illegal influence on the results of official sports competitions, as well as the subjects of bribery. The characteristic of the corresponding structural units is given. Methodology:  Materials and methods research based on the analysis of documentary sources. the  basis  is  the  dialectical  method  of  cognition  of  the  facts  of  social  reality,  on  which  the  formal legal and comparative legal approaches are largely based. Conclusions. The most intense criminal match-fixing is practiced in such kinds of sports as football, futsal, basketball and volleyball. Among the ways to encourage athletes to commit illegal acts, bribery predominates (75%). Approximately at the same level in terms of prevalence with small fluctuations in specific weight are structurally located such ways of influencing athletes as incitement (10%), conspiracy (8%) and coercion (7%). In general, illegal influence on the results of official sports competitions on bribery is directed directly at athletes. In total, the share of such influence is 78% with a slight predominance of bribery of several athletes (players) of one team (40%) over bribery of an individual player (38%). In second place in terms of ranking - bribery of members of the coaching staff (10%). Then bribery of judges (5%), owners of sports clubs (5%), support staff of clubs (2%).","PeriodicalId":41718,"journal":{"name":"Justicia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Justicia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17081/just.27.41.5362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the research is devoted to the criminological description and explanation of the state of illegal influence on the results of official sports competitions in Ukraine. Main  content. An ultra-high level of latency of crimes according to  Art. 369-3 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine is found, which is at least 99% of their actual level. The structure of match-fixing was revealed and analyzed depending on the type of sport, the method of illegal influence on the results of official sports competitions, as well as the subjects of bribery. The characteristic of the corresponding structural units is given. Methodology:  Materials and methods research based on the analysis of documentary sources. the  basis  is  the  dialectical  method  of  cognition  of  the  facts  of  social  reality,  on  which  the  formal legal and comparative legal approaches are largely based. Conclusions. The most intense criminal match-fixing is practiced in such kinds of sports as football, futsal, basketball and volleyball. Among the ways to encourage athletes to commit illegal acts, bribery predominates (75%). Approximately at the same level in terms of prevalence with small fluctuations in specific weight are structurally located such ways of influencing athletes as incitement (10%), conspiracy (8%) and coercion (7%). In general, illegal influence on the results of official sports competitions on bribery is directed directly at athletes. In total, the share of such influence is 78% with a slight predominance of bribery of several athletes (players) of one team (40%) over bribery of an individual player (38%). In second place in terms of ranking - bribery of members of the coaching staff (10%). Then bribery of judges (5%), owners of sports clubs (5%), support staff of clubs (2%).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非法影响官方体育比赛成绩的国外法律规制经验
本研究的目的是对乌克兰官方体育比赛结果受到非法影响的情况进行犯罪学描述和解释。主要内容。根据《乌克兰刑法典》第369-3条的规定,发现了超高水平的犯罪潜伏性,这至少是其实际水平的99%。根据体育类型、非法影响官方体育比赛结果的方法以及贿赂主体,揭示并分析了假球的结构。给出了相应结构单元的特征。方法论:在文献资料分析的基础上进行材料与方法研究。其基础是对社会现实事实的辩证认识方法,形式法学和比较法学在很大程度上都是基于这种方法。结论。在足球、五人制足球、篮球和排球等运动中,假球是最激烈的犯罪行为。在鼓励运动员实施违法行为的方式中,贿赂占主导地位(75%)。就患病率而言,在比重波动较小的情况下,影响运动员的方式在结构上大致相同,如煽动(10%)、阴谋(8%)和胁迫(7%)。一般来说,贿赂对官方体育比赛结果的非法影响直接针对运动员。总的来说,这种影响的份额为78%,其中一个团队的几个运动员(球员)的贿赂(40%)略高于单个运动员的贿赂(38%)。排名第二的是教练组成员的贿赂(10%)。然后贿赂法官(5%)、体育俱乐部老板(5%)和俱乐部支持人员(2%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Justicia
Justicia LAW-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dilemas derivados del uso de sistemas autónomos de armas letales en el derecho internacional humanitario Percepciones contemporáneas en Chile a propósito del proceso migratorio reciente Nueva era del Control Fiscal Tributario con los documentos electrónicos en Colombia El Río La Plata como sujeto de derechos en Colombia: caracterización del conflicto ambiental que llevó a su reconocimiento Abogados y política: Análisis de la participación de estudios de abogados en la segunda vuelta de la campaña electoral peruana
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1